SpongeScapes: Understanding the role of nature-based solutions in improving sponge functioning of landscapes – the case of regenerative agriculture

Open Access

Issue		E3S Web Conf. Volume 599, 2024 6^th International Conference on Science and Technology Applications in Climate Change (STACLIM 2024)


Article Number		05004
Number of page(s)		10
Section		Community Climate Resilience and Adaptation
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202459905004
Published online		10 January 2025

R. Lal, “Restoring Soil Quality to Mitigate Soil Degradation,” Sustainability, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 5875–5895, May (2015). doi: 10.3390/su7055875. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
R. Khangura, D. Ferris, C. Wagg, and J. Bowyer, “Regenerative Agriculture—A Literature Review on the Practices and Mechanisms Used to Improve Soil Health,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 2338, Jan. (2023). doi: 10.3390/su15032338. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
L. Schreefel, R. P. O. Schulte, I. J. M. de Boer, A. P. Schrijver, and H. H. E. van Zanten, “Regenerative agriculture – the soil is the base,” Glob Food Sec, vol. 26, p. 100404, Sep. (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100404. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
E. K. Bünemann et al., “Soil quality – A critical review,” Soil Biol Biochem, vol. 120, pp. 105–125, May (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
P. C. Baveye, J. Baveye, and J. Gowdy, “Soil ‘Ecosystem’ Services and Natural Capital: Critical Appraisal of Research on Uncertain Ground,” Front Environ Sci, vol. 4, no. JUN, Jun. (2016). doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2016.00041. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
H. M. Cooper et al., “COSMOS-UK: National soil moisture and hydrometeorology data for environmental science research,” Earth Syst Sci Data, vol. 13, no. 4, (2021). doi: 10.5194/essd-13-1737-2021. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
UK Greenhouse Gases Flux Network, “Soil moisture data,” (2024). Wallingford. [Google Scholar]
Md. Hussain and I. Mahmud, “pyMannKendall: a python package for non parametric Mann Kendall family of trend tests.,” J Open Source Softw, vol. 4, no. 39, (2019). doi: 10.21105/joss.01556. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
G. L. Harvey and A. J. Henshaw, “Rewilding and the water cycle,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, vol. 10, no. 6, (2023). doi: 10.1002/wat2.1686. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
J. Six, H. Bossuyt, S. Degryze, and K. Denef, “A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics,” (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.still.2004.03.008. [Google Scholar]
L. Wang, P. B. M. Pedersen, and J.-C. Svenning, “Rewilding abandoned farmland has greater sustainability benefits than afforestation,” npj Biodiversity, vol. 2, no. 1, (2023). doi: 10.1038/s44185-022-00009-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
R. Lal, “Forest soils and carbon sequestration,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 220, no. 1–3, (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.015. [Google Scholar]
T. G. Huntington, “Soil: Organic Matter and Available Water Capacity,” in Landscape and Land Capacity, vol. 49, no. 2, Second edition. | Boca Raton: CRC Press, [2020] | Revised edition of: Encyclopedia of natural resources. [2014].: CRC Press, (2020), pp. 273–281. doi: 10.1201/9780429445552-36.-36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
S. G. Baer, D. J. Kitchen, J. M. Blair, and C. W. Rice, “Changes in ecosystem structure and function along a chronosequence of restored grasslands,” Ecological Applications, vol. 12, no. 6, (2002). doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1688:CIESAF]2.0.CO;2. [Google Scholar]
C. M. Pittelkow et al., “Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture,” Nature, vol. 517, no. 7534, (2015). doi: 10.1038/nature13809. [Google Scholar]
H. Blanco-Canqui et al., “Cover crops and ecosystem services: Insights from studies in temperate soils,” Agron J, vol. 107, no. 6, (2015). doi: 10.2134/agronj15.0086. [Google Scholar]
A. D. Basche et al., “Soil water improvements with the long-term use of a winter rye cover crop,” Agric Water Manag, vol. 172, (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.04.006. [Google Scholar]
R. Lal, “Regenerative agriculture for food and climate,” (2020). doi: 10.2489/jswc.2020.0620A. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.