EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 483 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 483 (2024) 01003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 483, 2024
The 3rd International Seminar of Science and Technology (ISST 2023)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 9
Section Collaborative Contribution to Sustainable Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448301003
Published online 31 January 2024
  1. B. Santoso, T. W. Widayati, B. T. Hariadi, and M. N. Lekitoo, “Addition of cellulolytic bacteria in complete feed block based on agro-industrial byproducts for Kacang goats,” S Afr J Anim Sci, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 378–386, 2021, doi: 10.4314/sajas.v51i3.12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Zhang and Y. Dong, “Design and application of an efficient cellulose-degrading microbial consortium and carboxymethyl cellulase production optimization,” Front Microbiol, vol. 13, July 2022, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.957444. [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Bouzaiene et al., “Cellulolytic Bacillus Strain: Production Optimization Using Wheat Bran under Solid-State Fermentation and Investigation of Its Probiotic Potential,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 10, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15108394. [Google Scholar]
  4. Isnawati, F. I. Muhaimin, D. A. Rahayu, H. Fitrihidajati, and E. Ratnasari, “Probiotics formulated from indigenous bacteria from goat digestive tract and fed with fermented mixed feed Eichhornia crassipes and Zea mays cobs,” Biodiversitas, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 2906–2911, 2023, doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d240545. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. G. L. Cao, L. Zhao, A. J. Wang, Z. Y. Wang, and N. Q. Ren, “Single-step bioconversion of lignocellulose to hydrogen using novel moderately thermophilic bacteria,” Biotechnol Biofuels, vol. 7, no. 1, June 2014, doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-7-82. [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Korsa, R. Konwarh, C. Masi, A. Ayele, and S. Haile, “Microbial cellulase production and its potential application for textile industries,” Annals of Microbiology, vol. 73, no. 1. BioMed Central Ltd, Dec 2023. doi: 10.1186/s13213023-01715-w. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. K. Promon, W. Kamal, S. S. Rahman, M. M. Hossain, and N. Choudhury, “Ethanol production using vegetable peels medium and the effective role of cellulolytic bacterial (Bacillus subtilis) pre-treatment,” F1000Res, vol. 7, p. 271, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.13952.1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. W. A. Hamood Altowayti, H. Almoalemi, S. Shahir, and N. Othman, “Comparison of culture-independent and dependent approaches for identification of native arsenicresistant bacteria and their potential use for arsenic bioremediation,” Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, vol. 205, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111267. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Surkatti, Z. A. Al Disi, M. H. El-Naas, N. Zouari, M. C. M. Van Loosdrecht, and U. Onwusogh, “Isolation and Identification of Organics-Degrading Bacteria From Gas-to-Liquid Process Water,” Front Bioeng Biotechnol, vol. 8, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.603305. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. B. A. Adanikin, G. A. Ogunwande, and O. O. Adesanwo. “Evaluation and kinetics of biogas yield from morning glory (Ipomoea aquatica) co-digested with waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes).” Ecological Engineering vol. 98, pp 98–104. 2017. DOI : 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.067. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. E. Hossain, H. Sikder, M. H. Kabir, and S. M. Sarma. “Nutritive value of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes).” Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research, 5, 40–44, 2015. http://www.science-line.com/index/; http://www.ojafr.ir. [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Sivaramakrishnan, B. Ramprakash, G. Ramadoss, S. Suresh, A. Pugazhendhi, and A. Incharoensakdi. ”High potential of Rhizopus treated rice bran waste for the nutrient-free anaerobic fermentative biohydrogen production.” Bioresource Technology, vol. 319, 124–193, 2021. Doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124193. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Y. C. Liu, X. Zhou, Q. Dong, and H. Shi. “Study of the succession of microbial communities for sulfur cycle response to ecological factors change in sediment of sewage system.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22:9250–9259. 2015. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3934-0. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Shariff, M. N. S. Aziz, N. I. Ismail, and N. Abdullah. “Corn cob as a potential feedstock for slow pyrolysis of biomass.” Journal of Physical Science, 27, 123–137, 2016. Doi: 10.21315/jps2016.27.2.9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. K. A. Paynor, E. S. David, and M. J. G. Valentino. “Endophytic fungi associated with bamboo as possible sources of single cell protein using corn cob as a substrate.” Mycosphere 7, 139–147, 2016. Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/7/2/5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Hasil et al., “The Quality of Fermented Ruminant Feed Made from Common Water Hya-cinth (Eichornia crassipes),” Biosaintifika Journal of Biology & Biology Education, vol. 7, no. 1, 2015, doi: 10.15294/biosaintifika.v7i1.3535. [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Ratnasari and H. Fitrihidajati, “Efektivitas Pakan ‘Fermege’ Hasil Fermentasi Berbahan campuran Eceng Gondok, Ampas Tahu dan Kangkung,” 2018. [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. Farida, H. Sasongko, and Sugiyarto. “Utilization of local plant as fermented feed and supplements for livestock in Sendang Village, Wonogiri District.” Agrokreatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 4, 61–67, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/agrokreatif.4.1.61-67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Leite, D. Sousa, H. Fernandes, M. Ferreira, A.R. Costa, D. Filipe, M. Gonçalves, H. Peres, I. Belo, and J. M. Salgado. “Recent advances in production of lignocellulolytic enzymes by solid-state fermentation of agro-industrial wastes.”“Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 100407. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.100407. [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Z. David and M. Z. Larry. “Principles and Applications of Soil Microbiology,” 3rd ed. Elsevier, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Srichandana, P. K. Singh, R. Pattnaik, and S. Mishra. “Biogas Technology.” New India Publishing Agency (NIPA), 2021. [Google Scholar]
  22. F. Canon, T. Nidelet, E. Guédon, A. Thierry, and V. Gagnaire, “Understanding the Mechanisms of Positive Microbial Interactions That Benefit Lactic Acid Bacteria Cocultures,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 11. Frontiers Media S.A., Sep. 04, 2020. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.02088. [Google Scholar]
  23. G. A. W. Sudiartha, T. Imai, C. Mamimin, and A. Reungsang, “Effects of Temperature Shifts on Microbial Communities and Biogas Production: An In-Depth Comparison,” Fermentation, vol. 9, no. 7, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.3390/fermentation9070642. [Google Scholar]
  24. J. M. Gonzalez and B. Aranda, “Microbial Growth under Limiting Conditions-Future Perspectives,” Microorganisms, vol. 11, no. 7. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), Jul. 01, 2023. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11071641. [Google Scholar]
  25. N. Sharma, M. Lavania, V. Kukreti, and B. Lal, “Instigation of indigenous thermophilic bacterial consortia for enhanced oil recovery from high temperature oil reservoirs,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 5, May 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229889. [Google Scholar]
  26. B. L. Kumar and D. V. R. S. Gopal, “Effective role of indigenous microorganisms for sustainable environment,” 3 Biotech, vol. 5, no. 6. Springer Verlag, pp. 867–876, Dec. 01, 2015. doi: 10.1007/s13205-015-0293-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. L. Jiang et al., “Exploring the Influence of Environmental Factors on Bacterial Communities within the Rhizosphere of the Cu-tolerant plant, Elsholtzia splendens,”Sci Rep, vol. 6, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1038/srep36302. [Google Scholar]
  28. Y. Du et al., “The growth of plants and indigenous bacterial community were significantly affected by cadmium contamination in soil–plant system,” AMB Express, vol. 11, no. 1, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s13568-021-01264-y. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.