EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 483 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 483 (2024) 01004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 483, 2024
The 3rd International Seminar of Science and Technology (ISST 2023)
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 7
Section Collaborative Contribution to Sustainable Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448301004
Published online 31 January 2024
  1. M. Faizah and T. Ardyati, “Isolation and Identification of Indigenous Cellulolytic Bacteria from Sago Pith Waste at Palopo, South Sulawesi, Indonesia,” Life Sci, vol. 10, no. 2, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Yeasmin, C. H. Kim, S. M. A. Islam, and J. Y. Lee, “Population dynamics of cellulolytic bacteria depend on the richness of cellulosic materials in the habitat,” Microbiology (Russian Federation), vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 278–289, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1134/S0026261715020186. [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Srichandana, P. K. Singh, R. Pattnaik, and S. Mishra, Biogas Technology. New India Publishing Agency (NIPA), 2021. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Froidurot and V. Julliand, “Cellulolytic bacteria in the large intestine of mammals,” Gut Microbes, vol. 14, no. 1. Taylor and Francis Ltd., 2022. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2031694. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Giuliano C, Khan AW. Cellulase and Sugar Formation by Bacteroides cellulosolvens, a Newly Isolated Cellulolytic Anaerobe. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Aug;48(2):446–8. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.2.446-448.1984. PMID: 16346612; PMCID: PMC241537. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. N. Akhtar, “Biodiversity Of Cellulase Producing Bacteria And Their Applications.” [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312936132 [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Li et al., “Diversity and activity of cellulolytic bacteria, isolated from the gut contents of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) (Valenciennes) fed on Sudan grass (Sorghum sudanense) or artificial feedstuffs,” Aquac Res, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 153–164, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1111/are.12478. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Huang S, Sheng P, Zhang H. Isolation and identification of cellulolytic bacteria from the gut of Holotrichia parallela larvae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(3):2563–2577. doi: 10.3390/ijms13032563. Epub 2012 Feb 23. PMID: 22489111; PMCID: PMC3317674. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kersters, K., De Vos, P., Gillis, M., Swings, J., Vandamme, P., Stackebrandt, E. (2006). Introduction to the Proteobacteria. In: Dworkin, M., Falkow, S., Rosenberg, E., Schleifer, KH., Stackebrandt, E. (eds) The Prokaryotes. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30745-1_1. [Google Scholar]
  10. Satoshi Nakagawa, Ken Takai, Fumio Inagaki, Hisako Hirayama, Takuro Nunoura, Koki Horikoshi, Yoshihiko Sako. Distribution, phylogenetic diversity and physiological characteristics of epsilon-Proteobacteria in a deep-sea hydrothermal field. Environmental Microbiology, Volume7, Issue10, October 2005, Pages 1619–1632, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00856.x [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Trujillo-Cabrera, Y., Ponce-Mendoza, A., Vásquez-Murrieta, M.S. et al. Diverse cellulolytic bacteria isolated from the high humus, alkaline-saline chinampa soils. Ann Microbiol 63, 779–792, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-012-0533-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Marta P. Alves, Fred A. Rainey, M. Fernanda Nobre, Milton S. da Costa, Thermomonas hydrothermalis sp. Nov., A New Slightly Thermophilic γProteobacterium Isolated from a Hot Spring in Central Portugal, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Volume 26, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 70–75, ISSN 0723-2020, https://doi.org/10.1078/072320203322337335. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0723202004701617) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Swift SM, Reid KP, Donovan DM, Ramsay TG. Thermophile Lytic Enzyme Fusion Proteins that Target Clostridium perfringens. Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 Nov 8;8(4):214. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8040214. PMID: 31717357; PMCID: PMC6963370. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Artzi L, Dassa B, Borovok I, Shamshoum M, Lamed R, Bayer EA. Cellulosomics of the cellulolytic thermophile Clostridium clariflavum. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014 Jul 1;7:100. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-7-100. PMID: 26413154; PMCID: PMC4582956. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Dumitrache, G.M. Wolfaardt, D. G. Allen, et al. “Tracking the cellulolytic activity of Clostridium thermocellum biofilms.” Biotechnol Biofuels 6, 175, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-175 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Y. Lü, N. Li, X. Yuan. et al. “Enhancing the Cellulose-Degrading Activity of Cellulolytic Bacteria CTL-6 (Clostridium thermocellum) by Co-Culture with Noncellulolytic Bacteria W2-10 (Geobacillus sp.).” Appl Biochem Biotechnol 171, 1578–1588, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-013-0431-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. N. Nurliana, B. H. Siregar, W. E. Sari, T. Z. Helmi, S. Sugito. “Identification of cellulolytic lactic acid bacteria from the intestines of laying hens given AKBISprob based on 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene analysis.” Vet World. Jul 2022. 15(7):1650–1656. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.1650-1656. Epub, July 14 2022. PMID: 36185519; PMCID: PMC9394149. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. A.T. de Paula, A. B. Jeronymo-Ceneviva, L. F. Silva, et al. “Leuconostoc mesenteroides SJRP55: a potential probiotic strain isolated from Brazilian water buffalo mozzarella cheese.” Ann Microbiol 65, 899–910, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-014-0933-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Dobrzyński, P.S. Wierzchowski, W. Stępień, E. B. Górska. “The Reaction of Cellulolytic and Potentially Cellulolytic Spore-Forming Bacteria to Various Types of Crop Management and Farmyard Manure Fertilization in Bulk Soil.” Agronomy. 2021. 11(4):772. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040772 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.