EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 483 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 483 (2024) 02007 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 483, 2024
The 3rd International Seminar of Science and Technology (ISST 2023)
Article Number 02007
Number of page(s) 9
Section Sustainable Living through Functional and Eco-friendly Agricultural Trends
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448302007
Published online 31 January 2024
  1. A. P. Dewi, “Pengaruh Nasi Putih Baru Matang dan Nasi Putih Kemarin (Teretrogradasi) terhadap Kadar Glukosa Darah Postprandial Pada Subjek Wanita Pra Diabetes [The Effect of Freshly Cooked White Rice and Yesterday’s White Rice (Retrograded) on Postprandial Blood Gluco,” Universitas Diponegoro, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. W. Trisnasari, T. Perdana, Y. Deliana, and Marimin, “Situational analysis of shallot supply chain innovation system: A case study of Majalengka, West Java, Indonesia,” Int. J. Supply Chain Manag., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 191–206, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. WHO, “Quick facts What are the causes/risk factors for diabetes? What are the symptoms of diabetes?,” 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Chelliah et al., “Effect of Rice Processing towards Lower Rapidly Available Glucose (RAG) Favors Idli, a South Indian Fermented Food Suitable for Diabetic Patients,” Nutrients, vol. 11, pp. 1–16, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11071497. [Google Scholar]
  5. A. S. Hadi, A. Khairi, C. P. Asri, B. Artha, and U. T. Sari, “Peningkatan Pemahaman Siklus Hidup Produk Dan Pemasaran Digital Pada Kelompok Tani Ikan Di Desa Donoharjo [Increasing Understanding of the Product Life Cycle and Digital Marketing in Fish Farming Groups in Donoharjo Village],” ABDIMAS ALTRUIS J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 88–93, 2021, doi: 10.24071/aa.v4i2.3495. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Margono et al., “Menurunkan Indeks Glikemik Beras Putih Melalui Proses Pratanak,” Equilib. J. Chem. Eng., vol. 4, no. 2, p. 37, 2021, doi: 10.20961/equilibrium.v4i2.45464. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. N. Susilo, R. Hasbullah, and S. Sugiyono, “Proses Pengolahan Beras Pratanak Memperbaiki Kualitas dan Menurunkan Indeks Glikemik Gabah Varietas Ciherang [Parboiled Rice Processing Improve Quality and Reduce Glycemic Index of Paddy cv. Ciherang],” J. Pangan, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 209–220, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Osterwalder and Y. Pigneur, Business Model Generation, no. 59. Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2010. doi: 10.4324/9780203731178-14. [Google Scholar]
  9. S. H. & S. Muhammad, Studi Kelayakan Proyek [Project Feasibility Study], 4th ed. UPP AMP YKPN, Yogyakarta, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  10. R. A. Sartono, Manajemen Keuangan Internasional [International Finance Management]. BPFE, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  11. D. R. H.-M. M. Mowen, Managerial Accounting. Rajawali Pers, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Maruta, “Analisis Break Even Point (BEP) sebagai Dasar Perencanaan Laba bagi Manajemen [Break Even Point (BEP) Analysis as a Basis for Profit Planning for Management],” J. Akuntasi Syariah, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 9–28, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Kasmir, Studi Kelayakan Bisnis. Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Naseem, S. Mhlanga, and A. Diagne, “Economic Analysis of Consumer Choices based on Rice Attributes in The Food Markets of West Africa — The Case of Benin,” pp. 575–589, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s12571-013-0276-6. [Google Scholar]
  15. I. T. Keith Tomlins, John Manful, Joseph Gayin, Bernice Kudjawu, “Study of Sensory Evaluation, Consumer Acceptability, Affordability and Market Price of Rice,” J. Sci. Food Agric., vol. 87, pp. 1564–1575, 2007, doi: 10.1002/jsfa. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Islamiah, H. Nuryani, and A. Apriyantono, “Studi Preferensi Varietas Unggul Beras pada Konsumen dari Beberapa Wilayah yang Mewakili Konsumen Beras Indonesia [Study of Preferences for Superior Rice Varieties among Consumers from Several Regions Representing Indonesian Rice Consumers],” 2011. [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Demont, E. Zossou, P. Rutsaert, M. Ndour, P. Van Mele, and W. Verbeke, “Consumer Valuation of Improved Rice Parboiling Technologies in Benin,” Food Qual. Prefer., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 63–70, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.07.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hammad Akram and N. Tinaprilla, “Analisis Kelayakan Pengembangan Usaha Pengolahan Kerupuk Ikan Lele Clipss Catfish Chips Di Kota Bogor [Feasibility Analysis of Developing a Clipss Catfish Chips Catfish Crackers Processing Business in Bogor City],” Forum Agribisnis, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 95–105, 2020, doi: 10.29244/fagb.10.2.95-105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. P. T. W. Kusuma, “Analisis Kelayakan Finansial Pengembangan Usaha Kecil Menengah (UKM) Nata De Coco Di Sumedang, Jawa Barat,” J. Inov. dan Kewirausahaan, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 113–120, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  20. N. Lutfiani, U. Rahardja, and I. S. P. Manik, “Peran Inkubator Bisnis dalam Membangun Startup pada Perguruan Tinggi [The Role of Business Incubators in Building Startups in Higher Education],” J. Penelitan Ekon. dan Bisnis, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 77–89, 2020, doi: 10.33633/jpeb.v5i1.2727. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Melgar Pozos, “Pre-Feasibility Study Small and Medium Enterprise Development Authority,” Food Agric. Organ. United Nations, no. 15, 2005, [Online]. Available: http://sanat-o-tijarat.org/Feasibilities/219LiveStockFeasibility.pdf [Google Scholar]
  22. Nasir, M. H. Bintoro, and W. H. Limbong, “Kelayakan dan Strategi Pengembangan Usaha Beras Cimanuk melalui Peningkatan Mutu Oleh PD Jaya Saputra Kecamatan Cimanuk Kabupaten Pandeglang Provinsi Banten [Feasibility and Strategy for Cimanuk Rice Business Development through Quality Improvement by PD,” Manaj. IKM J. Manaj. Pengemb. Ind. Kecil Menengah, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 102–110, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jurnalmpi/article/view/5795 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.