EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 483 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 483 (2024) 03003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 483, 2024
The 3rd International Seminar of Science and Technology (ISST 2023)
Article Number 03003
Number of page(s) 12
Section Trends in Mathematics and Computer Science for Sustainable Living
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448303003
Published online 31 January 2024
  1. S. Tilaar, “Analisis pencemaran logam berat di muara sungai Tondano dan muara sungai Sario Manado Sulawesi Utara [Analysis of heavy metal polution In river mouths and estuaries Tondano and Sario in Manado City North Sulawes],” J. Ilm. Platax, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 32–39, (2014), doi: 10.35800/jip.2.1.2014.4406. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. J. R. Wahyu Widowati, Astiana Sastiono, Efek toksik logam : pencegahan dan penanggulangan pencemaran [Toxic effects of metals: prevention and control of pollution], (Yogyakarta, Andi, 2008). [Google Scholar]
  3. Meirikayanti, B. S. R. Halimatus, and A. M. Sahidu, “Analisis Kandungan Logam Berat Tembaga (Cu) pada Kepiting Bakau (Scylla sp.) di Sungai Wonorejo, Surabaya [Analysis of Heavy Metal Copper (Cu) Content on Mud Crab (Scylla sp.) at Wonorejo River, Surabaya],” J. Ilm. Perikan. DAN Kelaut. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 106–111, (2018), doi: 10.20473/jipk.v10i2.10499. [Google Scholar]
  4. L. L. E. Vay, “Ecology and Management of Mud Crab Scylla spp., ” in Proceedings of the International Forum on the Culture of Portunid Crabs, vol. 14, pp. 101–111, 2001, doi: 10.33997/j.afs.2001.14.2.001. [Google Scholar]
  5. I. Nagelkerken, S.J.M. Blaber, S. Bouillon, P. Green, M. Haywood, L.G. Kirton, J.-O. Meynecke, J. Pawlik, H.M. Penrose, A. Sasekumar, P.J. Somerfield, “The habitat function of mangroves for terrestrial and marine fauna : A review,” www.sciencedirect.com Aquat., vol. 89, pp. 155–185, (2008), doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.007. [Google Scholar]
  6. R. O. S. E. M. Otinus Lokbere, F.B. Boneka, C.A. Sinjal, Billy Th. Wagey, Medy Ompi and Fakultas, “Ikan yang beruaya di daerah mangrove Pantai Tasik Ria [Fish that migrate in the mangrove area of the Tasik Ria Coast],” J. Pesisir dan Laut Trop., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 242–246, (2019), doi: 10.35800/jplt.7.3.2019.24515. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. I. Majid, M. Henie, I. Al, F. Rohman, and I. Syamsuri, “Konservasi hutan mangrove di pesisir pantai kota Ternate terintegrasi dengan kurikulum sekolah [Mangrove forest conservation on the coast of Ternate city is integrated with the school curriculum],” J. BIOeduKASI, vol. 4, No (2), pp. 488–496, (2016), doi: https://doi.org/10.33387/bioedu.v4i2.162. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Toaha, Pemodelan matematika dalam dinamika populasi [Mathematical modeling in population dynamics], 1st ed. (Makassar, Dua Satu Press, 2013). [Google Scholar]
  9. N. S. S. Barhoom and S. Al-nassir, “Dynamical Behaviors of a Fractional-Order Three Dimensional Prey-Predator Model,” Hindawi Abstr. Appl. Anal., vol. 2021, pp. 1–10, (2021), doi: 10.1155/2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Banerjee, P. Das, and D. Mukherjee, “Global dynamics of a Holling Type-III two prey–one predator discrete model with optimal harvest strategy,” Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 3285–3300, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11071-020-05490-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Ibrahim, “Optimal harvesting of a predator-prey system with marine reserve,” Sci. African, vol. 14, p. e01048, (2021), doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e01048. [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Didiharyono, S. Toaha, J. Kusuma, and Kasbawati, “Stability analysis of two predators and one prey population model with harvesting in fisheries management,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, pp. 1–8, (2021), doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/921/1/012005. [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Jana, M. Chakraborty, K. Chakraborty, and T. K. Kar, “Global stability and bifurcation of time delayed prey – predator system incorporating prey refuge,” Math. Comput. Simul., vol. 85, pp. 57–77, (2012), doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2012.10.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. N. A. M. Subchan, “Stability and bifurcation analysis of time delayed preypredator system with Holling type-III response function,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Appl. Math., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 528–541, (2020), doi: 10.12962/j24775401.v6i2.5456. [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Chakraborty, M. Chakraborty, and T. K. Kar, “Nonlinear Analysis : Hybrid Systems Bifurcation and control of a bioeconomic model of a prey – predator system with a time delay,” Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 613–625, (2011), doi: 10.1016/j.nahs.2011.05.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Pradhan, A. Johri, and S. Jain, “A Model for Fishery Resource with Reserve Area and Facing Prey-Predator Interactions,” Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 255–264, (2017), doi: 10.12988/ijcms.2017.7623A. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Toaha and Rustam, “Optimal harvesting policy of predator-prey model with free fishing and reserve zones,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, (2017), no. January 2017, doi: 10.1063/1.4978992. [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Huo, H. Jiang, and X. Meng, “A dynamic model for fishery resource with reserve area and taxation,” J. Appl. Math., vol. 2012, pp. 1–15, (2012), doi: 10.1155/2012/794719. [Google Scholar]
  19. Y. Lv, R. Yuan, and Y. Pei, “A prey-predator model with harvesting for fishery resource with reserve area q,” Appl. Math. Model., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 3048–3062, (2013), doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2012.07.030. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Sharma and B. Gupta, “Harvesting Model for Fishery Resource with Reserve Area and Bird Predator,” J. Mar. Biol., vol. 2014, (2014), doi: 10.1155/2014/218451. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. K. Agnihotri and S. Nayyer, “Stability analysis of a predator (bird) – prey (fish) harvesting model in the reserved and unreserved area,” vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 678–684, (2018), doi: 10.26637/MJM0603/0032. [Google Scholar]
  22. H. Yang and J. Jia, “Harvesting of a predator – prey model with reserve area for prey and in the presence of toxicity,” J. Appl. Math. Comput., (2016), doi: 10.1007/s12190016-0989-8. [Google Scholar]
  23. M. R. Lemnaouar, M. Khalfaoui, Y. Louartassi, and I. Tolaimate, “Fractional order prey-predator model with infected predators in the presence of competition and toxcity,” vol. 15, pp. 1–16, (2020), doi: 10.1051/mmnp/2020002. [Google Scholar]
  24. M. R. Lemnaouar, H. Benazza, M. Khalfaoui, and Y. Louartassi, “Dynamical behaviours of prey-predator fishery model with two reserved area for prey in the presence of toxicity and response function holling type iv,” vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 2893–2913, (2021), doi: 10.28919/jmcs/5268. [Google Scholar]
  25. S. Toaha and Kasbawati, “Optimal harvesting of prey-predator fishery modeling in a two patch environment and harvesting in unprotected area,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science PAPER, pp. 0–8, (2019), doi: 10.1088/17551315/279/1/012014. [Google Scholar]
  26. B. Roy and S. K. Roy, “Prey-predator model in drainage system with migration and harvesting,” Nonauton. Dyn. Sys, pp. 152–167, (2021), doi: 10.1515/msds-2021-0131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. C. Raymond, A. Hugo, and M. Kung’Aro, “Modeling dynamics of prey-predator fishery model with harvesting: A bioeconomic model,” J. Appl. Math., vol. 2019, (2019), doi: 10.1155/2019/2601648. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. B. Dubey, S. Agarwal, and A. Kumar, “Optimal harvesting policy of a prey–predator model with Crowley–Martin-type functional response and stage structure in the predator,” Nonlinear Anal. Model. Control, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 493–514, (2018), doi: 10.15388/NA.2018.4.3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Toaha, J. Kusuma, Khaeruddin, and M. Bahri, “Stability Analysis and Optimal Harvesting Policy of Prey-Predator Model with Stage Structure for Predator,” Appl. Math. Sci., vol. 8, no. 159, pp. 7923–7934, (2014), doi: 10.12988/ams.2014.410792. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.