Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 483, 2024
The 3rd International Seminar of Science and Technology (ISST 2023)
Article Number 03011
Number of page(s) 21
Section Trends in Mathematics and Computer Science for Sustainable Living
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448303011
Published online 31 January 2024
  1. B. K. dan I. Publik, National Movement to Return to Public Transport, Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia, 2022, [Online], Available: https://dephub.go.id/post/read/gerakan-nasional-kembali-ke-angkutan-umum [Accessed: Jan. 20, 2023] [Google Scholar]
  2. Y. Astuti, Minister of Transportation Releases Bus Friend Application for Transportation, What is it?, CNBC Indonesia, 2020, [Online], Available: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20200602171348-37-162521/menhub-rilis-aplikasi-teman-bus-buat-transportasi-apa-itu [Accessed: Apr. 11, 2023] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. H. Manumoyoso, Trans Semanggi Suroboyo occupancy is the highest in Indonesia, Kompas.id, 2023, [Online], Available: https://www.kompas.id/baca/nusantara/2023/02/14/keterisian-trans-semanggi-suroboyo-tertinggi-di-indonesia, [Accessed: Apr. 11, 2023] [Google Scholar]
  4. G. P. Store, Teman Bus [Bus Mates], Google Play Store, 2023, [Online], Available: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dhs.bts&hl=en_US, [Accessed: Feb. 01, 2023] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. S. Mahfudz, F. Agusti, S. Az Zahra, and B. R. Dhini, Heuristic Evaluation Analysis Using the 10 Nielsen Rule Usability Method on the Kai Access Application, Proceeding Int. Conf. Sci. Heal. Technol., 325–337 (2022). doi: 10.47701/icohetech.v3i1.2154 [Google Scholar]
  6. L. A. T. Arakian, I. G. M. Darmawiguna, I. G. A. A. D. Indradewi, Evaluation of User Satisfaction Using Pieces Framework in the Bus Friends Application, J. of Compt. (Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 2022) [Google Scholar]
  7. D. A. Norman, Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, (New York: Basic Books, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  8. S. (Fone) Pengnate and R. Sarathy, An experimental investigation of the influence of website emotional design features on trust in unfamiliar online vendors, Comput. Human Behav., 67, 49–60 (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.018 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Jin, Emotional Design in Web Icons, 2018, [Online], Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sph&AN=119374333&site=ehostlive&scope=site https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.010 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.006 [Accessed: Apr. 11, 2023] [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Gumulya and P. Nastasia, Study of Emotional Design Theory, 12, 2, 121–146 (2015), [Online], Available: http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/1534/5/Bab2.pdf [Accessed: Apr. 11, 2023] [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Xu, S. Andres, A. Pruttianan, D. France, N. Lau, J. A. Adams, M. B. Weinger, Human performance measures for the evaluation of process control human-system interfaces in high-fidelity simulations, Appl. Ergon., 73, June, 151–165 (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.06.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Rummel, Predicting Post-Task User Satisfaction With Weibull Analysis of Task Completion Times, J. Usability Stud., 13, 1, 5–16 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Demissie and A. Rorissa, The effect of information quality and satisfaction on a parent’s behavioral intention to use a learning community management system, Libri, 65, 2, 143–150 (2015), doi: 10.1515/libri-2015-0019 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. P. de Vries, C. Midden, and D. Bouwhuis, The effects of errors on system trust, selfconfidence, and the allocation of control in route planning, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 58, 6, 719–735 (2003), doi: 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00039-9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Wong and M. S. Haque, Understanding the brand and website effects of online loyalty: a mediation perspective, J. Mark. Manag., 1–36 (2021), doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2021.1949378 [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Kusumawati, and K. S. Rahayu, The effect of experience quality on customer perceived value and customer satisfaction and its impact on customer loyalty, Adv. Econ. Business, Manag. Res., 661, 260–268 (2023), doi: 10.1108/TQM-05-2019-0150 [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Kumar, S. Dhingra, V. Batra, and H. Purohit, A Framework of Mobile Banking Adoption in India, J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 6, 2 (2020), doi: 10.3390/JOITMC6020040 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, and C. M. Ringle, A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), (2017) [Google Scholar]
  19. I. Syarifuddin; Al Saudi, Metode Riset Praktis Regresi Berganda Menggunakan SPSS [Practical Research Methods of Multiple Regression Using SPSS], (Palangkaraya: Bobby Digital Center, 2022) [Google Scholar]
  20. C. J. Lin, Y. T. Prasetyo, and R. Widyaningrum, Eye movement measures for predicting eye gaze accuracy and symptoms in 2D and 3D displays, Displays, 60, 1–8 (2019), doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2019.08.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. D. S. Dewi, A. Sudiarno, H. Saputra, and R. S. Dewi, The effect of emotional design and online customer review on customer repeat purchase intention in online stores, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 337, 1 (2018), doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/337/1/012052 [Google Scholar]
  22. S. F. Pengnate and P. P. Antonenko, A Multimethod Evaluation of Online Trust and Its Interaction with Metacognitive Awareness: An Emotional Design Perspective, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., 29, 9, 582–593 (2013), doi: 10.1080/10447318.2012.735185. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Lal, Digital Design Essentials: 100 Ways to Design Better Desktop, Web, and Mobile Interfaces, (Beverly: Rockport Publishers, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  24. W. Zhang, X. Leng, and S. Liu, Research on mobile impulse purchase intention in the perspective of system users during COVID-19, Pers. Ubiquitous Comput., 1–9 (2020), doi: 10.1007/s00779-020-01460-w. [Google Scholar]
  25. Y. Yassierli, V. Vinsensius, and M. S. S. Mohamed, The Importance of Usability Aspect in M-Commerce Application for Satisfaction and Continuance Intention, Makara J. Technol., 22, 3, 149 (2019), doi: 10.7454/mst.v22i3.3655 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. A. A. Bachtiar and D. Mulia, Analysis of the Effect of Usability, Trust, and Risk Perception on Buying Interest in the Purchase Category of Mobile and Tablet Products through the ABC Application, Eur. J. Bus. Manag. Res., 8, 1, 40–46 (2023), doi: 10.24018/ejbmr.2023.8.1.1763 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. M. A. Faudzi, Z. C. Cob, R. Omar, and S. A. Sharudin, Evaluating Learning Management System based on PACMAD Usability Model: Brighten Mobile Application, Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., 13, 5, 614–621 (2022), doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130573 [Google Scholar]
  28. D.A, A. Pramiswari, and P. Y. Setiawan, The Effect of Information Quality and Perceived Ease of Use on Trust Towards Repurchase Behavior, Int. J. Econ. Commer. Manag. United Kingdom, VII, 11, 100–112, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://ijecm.co.uk/. [Google Scholar]
  29. C. Qing and S. Jin, What Drives Consumer Purchasing Intention in Live Streaming ECommerce?, Front. Psychol., 13, 1–11 (2022), doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938726 [Google Scholar]
  30. M. A. Albaom, F. Sidi, M. A. Jabar, R. Abdullah, The Moderating Role of Personal Innovativeness in Tourists’ Intention to Use Web 3.0 Based on Updated Information Systems Success Model, Sustain., 14, 21 (2022), doi: 10.3390/su142113935 [Google Scholar]
  31. K. Madhani, M. T. Khasawneh, S. Kaewkuekool, A. K. Gramopadhye, and B. J. Melloy, Measurement of Human Trust in a Hybrid Inspection for Varying Error Patterns, in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 46, 418–422 (2022), doi: 10.1177/154193120204600343 [Google Scholar]
  32. D. Salanitri, C. Hare, S. Borsci, G. Lawson, S. Sharples, and B. Waterfield, Relationship between trust and usability in virtual environments: An ongoing study, Inte. Conf. on Human-Comp. Interaction, 9169, 49–59 (2015), doi: 10.1007/978-3319-20901-2_5 [Google Scholar]
  33. N. Adisty, Exploring the Development of Smartphone Use in Indonesia, GoodStats, 2022, [Online], Available: https://goodstats.id/article/mengulik-perkembanganpenggunaan-smartphone-di-indonesia-sT2LA [Accessed May 18, 2023] [Google Scholar]
  34. V. D. Ginting, I. K. K. Putra, N. P. A. Maharani, R. A. F. Kusuma, and A. D. Dwipayana, Integration of Bus Friends Services in National Tourism Strategic Areas in Bali, J. Rekayasa Sipil dan Lingkungg., 6, 2, 176–189 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis, vol. 7 edition, (New Jersey, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  36. L. Lischke, V. Schwind, R. Schweigert, P. W. Wozniak, and N. Henze, Understanding pointing for workspace tasks on large high-resolution displays, ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser. (2019), doi: 10.1145/3365610.3365636 [Google Scholar]
  37. G. Haglund and C. M. Roman, A quantitative analysis of the importance of visual appeal and usability in e-commerce, Jönköping University (2020) [Google Scholar]
  38. N. Parsazadeh, R. Ali, M. Rezaei, and S. Z. Tehrani, The construction and validation of a usability evaluation survey for mobile learning environments, Stud. Educ. Eval., 58, 97–111 (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.06.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. S. An, T. Eck, and H. Yim, Understanding Consumers’ Acceptance Intention to Use Mobile Food Delivery Applications through an Extended Technology Acceptance Model, Sustainability, 15, 1, 1–14 (2023), doi: 10.3390/su15010832 [Google Scholar]
  40. R. Setiawan, A. Eliyana, T. Suryani, E. G. Aristo, and A. Anwar, A Study Of Behavioral Intention: The Practices For Mobile Payment Technology Users In Indonesia, Webology, 19, 2, 2364–2381, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://www.webology.org [Google Scholar]
  41. C. J. Lin and R. Widyaningrum, Eye Pointing in Stereoscopic Tasks, J. Eye Mov. Res., 9, 5, 1–14 (2016), doi: 10.16910/jemr.9.5.4 [Google Scholar]
  42. Nuryadi, T. D. Astuti, E. S. Utami, and M. Budiantara, Textbook of Basics of Research Statistics (2017) [Google Scholar]
  43. K. S. Taber, The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education, Res. Sci. Educ., 48, 1273–1296 (2018), doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, N. P. Danks, and S. Ray, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Switzerland (2021) [Google Scholar]
  45. W. Ali, O. Riaz, S. Mumtaz, A. R. Khan, T. Saba, and S. A. Bahaj, Mobile Application Usability Evaluation: A Study Based on Demography, IEEE Access, 10, 41512–41524 (2022), doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3166893 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. H. M. Az-Zahra, N. Fauzi, and A. P. Kharisma, Evaluating E-marketplace Mobile Application Based on People at the Center of Mobile Application Development (PACMAD) Usability Model, in Proceedings of 2019 4th International Conf. on Sustainable Information Engineering and Tech., SIET, 72–77 (2022), doi: 10.1109/SIET48054.2019.8986067. [Google Scholar]
  47. D. T. Amijaya Sulhaini, and L. E. Herman, Influence of Trust, Subjective Norm, and Perceived Usefulness on the Intention of Using Contraceptives with Education Level as Moderation Variables, Int. J. Multicult. Multireligious Underst., 8, 8, 125–137 (2021), doi: 10.18415/ijmmu.v8i8.2848 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.