Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 483, 2024
The 3rd International Seminar of Science and Technology (ISST 2023)
Article Number 03013
Number of page(s) 14
Section Trends in Mathematics and Computer Science for Sustainable Living
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448303013
Published online 31 January 2024
  1. S. Wanpen, K. Sonkoontod, and K. Nonkukhetkhong, “Technical Vocabulary Proficiencies and Vocabulary Learning Strategies of Engineering Students,” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 88, pp. 312–320, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.511. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Richards and W. Renandya, Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice (Cambridge Professional Learning). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511667190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Altiner, “Integrating a computer-based flashcard program into academic vocabulary learning,” ProQuest Diss. Theses, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 82, 2011, [Online]. Available: http://search.proquest.com/docview/894742332?accountid=13042%5Cn http://oxfordsf x.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/oxford?url_ver=Z39.882004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genre=dissertations+&+theses& sid=ProQ:ProQuest+Dissertations+&+Theses:+The+H [Google Scholar]
  4. W. D. Dwiyogo, “Developing a Blended Learning-Based Method for Problem-Solving in Capability Learning,” Tojet Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 51–61, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  5. I. Salsabila, R. Apriliaswati, and L. Suhartono, “the Use of Categories Game To Teach Students’ Vocabularies on Writing Descriptive Text,” p. 1, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  6. X. Shi, “Application of multimedia technology in vocabulary learning for engineering students,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 21–31, 2017, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v12i01.6153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. L. S. L. Purba, “The effectiveness of the quizizz interactive quiz media as an online learning evaluation of physics chemistry 1 to improve student learning outcomes,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1567, no. 2, pp. 16–20, 2020, doi: 10.1088/17426596/1567/2/022039. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Derakhshan and E. Davoodi Khatir, “The Effects of Using Games on English Vocabulary Learning,” J. Appl. Linguist. Lang. Res., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 39–47, 2015, [Online]. Available: www.jallr.ir [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Vargas, “Modern Learning: Quizlet in The Social Studies Classroom,” Wichita State University, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  10. İ. Çinar and A. Ari, “The Effects of Quizlet on Secondary School Students’ Vocabulary Learning and Attitudes Towards English,” Asian J. Instr., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 60–73, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Okkan and S. Aydin, “The effects of the use of quizlet on vocabulary learning motivation,” Lang. Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 16–25, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  12. S. A. Licorish, H. E. Owen, B. Daniel, and J. L. George, “Students’ perception of Kahoot!’s influence on teaching and learning,” Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn., vol. 13, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s41039-018-0078-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. K. L. Smart and J. J. Cappel, “Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparative Study,” J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. December, pp. 201–219, 2006, doi: 10.28945/243. [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Lee and R. L. W. Harris, “The effects of online glossary quizzes and student autonomy on domain vocabulary learning in business law,” J. Comput. High. Educ., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 326–343, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s12528-018-9183-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. O. Learning, “Online Learning – Student perception survey,” vol. 2009, no. November, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Idowu, M. Nat, and P. S. Kissi, “Student perception of usefulness and ease using kahoot, a free web-based tool in a tertiary education setting,” Acta Sci. Technol., vol. 43, pp. 1–12, 2020, doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v43i1.47347. [Google Scholar]
  17. S. J. Franciosi, “The effect of computer game-based learning on FL vocabulary transferability,” Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 123–133, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Toy and K. Buyukkarci, “The Effects of Quizlet on Foreign Language Learners,” imanager’s J. Educ. Technol., vol. 16, no. 3, p. 2019, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  19. H. Prasetia et al., “Studi Pola Konsumsi Teh di Indonesia untuk Mendukung Diversifikasi Produk yang Berkelanjutan (A Study of Tea Consumption Pattern in Indonesia Toward Sustainable Product Diversification),” Biopropal Ind., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 107, 2020, doi: 10.36974/jbi.v11i2.6249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. E. Suwandi, F. H. Imansyah, and H. Dasril, “Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Menggunakan Skala Likert pada Layanan Speedy yang Bermigrasi ke Indihome,” J. Tek. Elektro, p. 11, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. D. E. Sari, “Quizlet: Aplikasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Smartphone Era Generasi Milenial,” J. Pendidik. Ilmu Sos., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2019, doi: 10.23917/jpis.v29i1.8150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Hikmah, S. Tinggi, T. Nurul, J. Paiton, and I. Terms, “Penggunaan Quizlet sebagai Media Pengenalan Informatics Terms,” no. 2013, pp. 1–6, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  23. S. C. Baptist, “Effects of Quizlet on vocabulary mastery.” Theses and dissertations, Jakarta, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Assanosi, “The Efect of Quizlet on Vocabulary Acquisition,” Asian J. Educ. ELearning, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 71–77, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  25. D. F. Amalia, “Quizizz Website as an Online Assessment for English Teaching and Learning: Students’ Perspectives,” Jo-ELT (Journal English Lang. Teaching) Fak. Pendidik. Bhs. Seni Prodi Pendidik. Bhs. Ingg. IKIP, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 1, 2020, doi: 10.33394/jo-elt.v7i1.2638. [Google Scholar]
  26. E. J. Sullivan and G. Gray, “Efficacy of Computer Games on Language Learning Blanka,” J. Prof. Nurs., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 245–246, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. P. A. K. Juniarta, K. S. Dewi, G. Mahendrayana, and I. W. Swandana, “The Analysis on the Implementation of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Strategy Through Quizizz Application to Improve Student’s Reading Comprehension at Undiksha Singaraja,” vol. 394, no. Icirad 2019, pp. 323–327, 2020, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.200115.053. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.