EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 483 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 483 (2024) 03018 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 483, 2024
The 3rd International Seminar of Science and Technology (ISST 2023)
Article Number 03018
Number of page(s) 12
Section Trends in Mathematics and Computer Science for Sustainable Living
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448303018
Published online 31 January 2024
  1. E. Zavvar, K. Hectors, W. De Waele, Stress concentration factors of multi-planar tubular KT-joints subjected to in-plane bending moments. Mar. Struct. 78, 103000 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2021.103000 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. H. S. Mohamed, X.S. Yang, Y.B. Shao, M.A. Shaheen, M.F. Suleiman, L. Zhang, A. Hossian, Stress concentration factors (SCF) of CFRP-reinforced T/Y-joints via ZPSS approach. Ocean Eng. 261, 112092 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112092 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Z. Pan, G. Wu, F. Si, J. Shang H. Zhou, Q. Li, T. Zhou, Parametric Study on SCF Distribution Along The Weld Toe of Internally Ring-Stiffened Two-Planar Tubular KK Joints Under Axial Loading. Ocean Eng. 248, 110826 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110826 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Haghpanahi, H. Pirali, Hot Spot Stress Determination for a Tubular T-Joint under Combined Axial and Bending Loading. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 17, 21 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Atteya, O. Mikkelsen, J. Wintle, G. Ersdal, Experimental and Numerical Study of the Elastic SCF of Tubular Joints. Materials 14, 4220 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14154220 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Santacruz, O. Mikkelsen, Numerical stress analysis of tubular joints. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1201, 012032 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1201/1/012032. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. API, API Recommended Practice 2A-WSD: Planning, Designing, and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Working Stress Design (America Petroleum Institute, Washington D.C., 2014) [Google Scholar]
  8. R. A. Primastuti, R. W. Prastianto, D. Alfian, I. Susanto, P. Fadlianto, F. Syalsabila, “Comparative Study of Tubular Joint Design Formulas According to API RP 2A WSD 21st Edition and 22nd Edition. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1198, 012018 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1198/1/012018 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Efthyimou, Recent Developments in Tubular Joint Technology. (Surreym, 1988) [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Ahmadi, M. A. Lotfollahi-Yaghin, M. H. Aminfar, “Stress concentration factors at saddle and crown positions on the central brace of two-planar welded CHS DKTconnections,” J. Mar. Sci. Appl. 11, 83 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-012-1109-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Ahmadi, E. Zavvar, The effect of multi-planarity on the SCFs in offshore tubular KTjoints subjected to in-plane and out-of-plane bending loads. Thin-Walled Struct. 106, 148 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2016.04.020 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. I. Noviyanti, R. W. Prastianto, M. Murdjito, Stress Distribution Analysis of DKDT Tubular Joint in a Minimum Offshore Structure. Rekayasa, 14, 191 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21107/rekayasa.v14i2.10511 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Prastianto, F. Admiral, Y. Hadiwidodo, D. Rosyid, Y. Mulyadi, K. Sambodho, Stress Concentration Factor Estimation of a Multi-planar DKT Tubular Joint through Finite Element and Machine Learning Approaches in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Sustainable Engineering Development and Technological Innovation, ICSEDTI 2022, Tanjungpinang, Indonesia, October 11-13 (2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.11-10-2022.2326418 [Google Scholar]
  14. R. W. Prastianto, I. A. Adha, Y. S. Hadiwidodo, D. M. Rosyid, Y. Mulyadi, “Hot Spot Stress Analysis of a Two-Planar DTY Tubular Joint Subjected to Axial Loading,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 1166, 012036 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1166/1/012036 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Zavvar, K. Hectors, W. De Waele, Stress concentration factors of multi-planar tubular KT-joints subjected to in-plane bending moments. Mar. Struct. 78, 103000 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2021.103000 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Ahmadi, E. Zavvar, Stress concentration factors induced by out-of-plane bending loads in ring-stiffened tubular KT-joints of jacket structures. Thin-Walled Struct. 91, 82 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2015.02.011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. AWS, Structural Welding Code Steel (American Welding Society, Miami, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Efthymiou, Development of SCF formulae and generalized influence functions for use in fatigue analysis, in Offshore Tubular Joints Conference, OTJ’88, (Surrey, 1988). [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Chang, W. D. Dover, Stress concentration factor parametric equations for tubular X and DT joints,” Int. J. Fatigue, 18, 363 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(96)00017-5 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. F. Hobbacher. Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components (Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23757-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Nassiraei, P. Rezadoost, Probabilistic analysis of the SCFs in tubular T/Y-joints reinforced with FRP under axial, in-plane bending, and out-of-plane bending loads. Structures, 35, 1078 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.029 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. I. Noviyanti, R. W. Prastianto, Numerical Study on the Stress Distribution Analysis of Two-Planar DKDT Tubular Joint Under Variation of Axial Loading Conditions BT Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering, in 5th International Conference on Mechanical Engineering, ICOME 2021, Virtual, Online, August, 25 26 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0867-5_3 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.