EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 600 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 600 (2024) 02021 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 600, 2024
The 6th International Geography Seminar (IGEOS 2023)
Article Number 02021
Number of page(s) 12
Section Geography and Disaster Mitigation Education
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202460002021
Published online 29 November 2024
  1. Caldis, Geography and STEM, GEOGRAPHICAL EDUCATION, vol. 32, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  2. “Framework for 21st Century Learning,” Battelle for Kids. [Google Scholar]
  3. Muh. Sholeh, Geography Lesson Development based Ecoliteracy, in Proceedings of the lst International Cohference on Geography and Education (ICGE 2016), Malang, Indonesia: Atlantis Press, (2017). doi: 10.2991/icge-16.2017.70. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Budi Santoso, P. Adi Wijayanto, S. Setiawan, N. Sa, N. Masruroh, and N. Azida Rahmah, The Utilization of Technology-Based Webgis as an Effort to Establish the Spatial Thinking Ability of Geographic Students In High School, (2021). [Google Scholar]
  5. R. W. Bybee, “What Is STEM Education?,” Science (1979), vol. 329, no. 5995, p. 996, (Aug. 2010), doi: 10.1126/science.1194998. [Google Scholar]
  6. N. Nofrion, B. Wijayanto, R. Wilis, and R. Novio, “Analisis Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) Guru Geografi di Kabupaten Solok, Sumatera Barat,” JURNAL GEOGRAFI, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 105, (Aug. 2018), doi: 10.24114/jg.v10i2.9070. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. N. Nofrion, “Effectiveness of EXO OLO TASK Learning Model Based on Lesson Study in Geography Learning,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 145, no. 1, (2018), doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/145/1/012038. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. N. Aboobaker and Z. KA, “Digital learning orientation and innovative behavior in the higher education sector: effects of organizational learning culture and readiness for change,” International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1030–1047, (Jan. 2021), doi: 10.1108/IJEM-09-2019-0345. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. H. Lin, H. C. Chen, and K. S. Liu, “A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 3553–3564, (2017), doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00744a. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nofrion and B. Wijayanto, Learning Activities In Higher Order Thinking Skill ( HOTS) Oriented Learning Context, Geosfera Indonesia, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 122–130, (2018), doi: DOI : 10.19184/geosi.v3i2.8126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Thomas-Brown and A. Richards, Critical Intersections of Knowledge and Pedagogy: Why the Geographic Literacy of Preservice Elementary Teachers Matter?, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Catling, High quality in primary humanities: insights from the UK’s school inspectorates, Educ 3 13, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 354–364, (May 2017), doi: 10.1080/03004279.2017.1296923. [Google Scholar]
  13. S. P. Sanina, The problems of learning geography: overview of foreign studies, Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 17–27, (2019), doi: 10.17759/jmfp.2019080102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Jan, “Teacher of 21st Century: Characteristics and Development, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  15. S. A. Nofrion and A. Ananda, EXO OLO-Task Learning Model: An Introduction To Hots-Oriented Learning Model Based On Lesson Study, Core.Ac.Uk, vol. 8, no. 28, pp. 162–170, (2017), [Online]. Available: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234641071.pdf [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Pri Utomo, Analisis Keterampilan Belajar (Learning Skills) dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Daring Berbasis Padlet Pada Mata Pelajaran Geografi, Jurnal PIPSI (Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Indonesia), vol. 7, no. 2, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  17. “2016 International Charter on Geographical Education IGU UGI CGE,” in 2016 International Charter on Geographical Education IGU UGI CGE, (2016). [Online]. Available: www.igu-cge.org [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Getis, M. D. Bjelland, and V. Getis, Introduction to geography. (2011). [Google Scholar]
  19. Nofrion et al., “EXO OLO TASK: The Development of Higher Order Thinking Skills through Learning Activities Management in Geography Learning,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 286, no. 1, (2019), doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/286/1/012006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Z. A. Farkhani, G. Badiei, and F. Rostami, Investigating the teacher’s perceptions of classroom management and teaching self-efficacy during Covid-19 pandemic in the online EFL courses Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, vol. 7, no. 1, (Dec. 2022), doi: 10.1186/s40862-022-00152-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. E. J. Theobald et al., “Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 12, pp. 6476–6483, (Mar. 2020), doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916903117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Fargher, “WebGIS for Geography Education: Towards a GeoCapabilities Approach,” ISPRS Int J Geoinf, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 111, (Mar. 2018), doi: 10.3390/ijgi7030111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Grand-Clement, A. Devaux, J. Belanger, and C. Manville, Digital Learning: Education and skills in the digital age. RAND Corporation, (2017). doi: 10.7249/CF369. [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Rivera-Vargas and C. Cobo, Digital learning: distraction or default for the future, (Jan. 2023). doi: 10.31235/osf.io/cnrf6. [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Graham, G. Stols, and R. Kapp, Teacher Practice and Integration of ICT: Why Are or Aren’t South African Teachers Using ICTs in Their Classrooms, International Journal of Instruction, vol. 13, pp. 749–766, (Oct. 2020), doi: 10.29333/iji.2020.13251a. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Taghizadeh and S. Amirkhani, “Pre-service EFL teachers’ conceptions and strategy use in managing online classes,” System, vol. 104, p. 102671, (Feb. 2022), doi: 10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2021.102671. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Malik and B. Akkaya, Comparing the Academic Motivation of Conventional and Distance Education Students: A Study about a Turkish University, sjesr, vol. 4, pp. 341–351, (Oct. 2021), doi: 10.36902/sjesr-vol4-iss2-2021(341-351). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Warner, M. Malik, and J. Mohammed, ICT Professional Development Workshops and Classroom Implementation Challenges: Perceptions of Secondary School Teachers in Trinidad and Tobago, vol. 7, pp. 1–19, Oct. (2021). [Google Scholar]
  29. Barry Maund, Perception, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2014. Accessed: Dec. 05, (2023). [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=omLfBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=perception&ots=lEwDe8talD&sig=y9NGl9JWRWmeCUT4SdR9iCL3c4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=perception&f=false [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. R. Efron, What is Perception?, in Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1966/1968, R. S. Cohen and M. W. Wartofsky, Eds., Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, (1969), pp. 137–173. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-3378-7_4. [Google Scholar]
  31. Fish W, Filsafat persepsi: Pengantar kontemporer., 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, (2021). [Google Scholar]
  32. Crane T, Apa masalah persepsi? Filsafat Sintesis, (2005). [Google Scholar]
  33. E. A. Krupinski, The importance of perception research in medical imaging, Radiat Med, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 329–334, (2000). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. I. Ghozali, Pendekatan Scientific Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Siswa, Jurnal Pedagogik, vol. 04, no. 01, pp. 1–13, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Tsaniyah Putri, PENERAPAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK (SCIENTIFIC APPROACH) DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI SMA, Amrizal / Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 215–223, (2020), [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/pelita/index [Google Scholar]
  36. A. H. M. Tawil, D. Ismaimuza, and S. Rochaminah, Penerapan Pendekatan Scientific Pada Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe think Pair Share Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Siswa di kelas VII SMPN 6 PALU, Jurnal Elektronik Pendidikan Matematika Tadulako, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 87–97, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  37. Siska, W. Triani, Yunita, Y. Maryuningsih, and M. Ubaidillah, Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis Socio Scientific Issues Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah, Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 22–33, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  38. K. Brookfield, ‘Nature-enhanced learning’ and geography education, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 327–342, (2022), doi: 10.1080/03098265.2021.1926938. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. R. J. Marzano and J. S. Kendall, The New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. California: Corwin Press, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  40. Popham and W. James, Classroom Assessment: What Teachers Need To Know. Second Edition. (1999). [Google Scholar]
  41. L. Suskie, Assessing Student Learning: A Common Sense Guide. Sanfrancisco: JosseyBass, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  42. D. A. Nafiati, Revisi taksonomi Bloom: Kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik, Humanika, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 151–172, 2021, doi: 10.21831/hum.v21i2.29252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Porter E. Coggins, L. K. Colburn, P. E. C. III, and L. K. Colburn, Guiding Preservice Teachers to Making a Shift in Thinking: Developing Skill and Confidence in Assessment through Thematic Integrated Units, Creat Educ, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1485–1503, (Aug. 2018), doi: 10.4236/CE.2018.910110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. A. Susilo and H. SU, Pengembangan E-Modul Akuntansi Kontekstual Berbasis Proyek Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Aplikatif Siswa Generasi Z, Jurnal VARIDIKA, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 99–107, (Jul. 2021), doi: 10.23917/VARIDIKA.V33I1.15308. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Richard I. Arends, Learning to Teach, 9th ed. McGraw-Hill, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  46. C. E. Hmelo-Silver, “Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?,” Educ Psychol Rev, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 235–266, (Sep. 2004), doi: 10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.F3/METRICS. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. D. Jonassen, J. Strobel, and C. B. Lee, Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 139–151, (Apr. 2006), doi: 10.1002/J.2168-9830.2006.TB00885.X. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. J. Piaget, Intellectual Evolution from Adolescence to Adulthood,” Hum Dev, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–12, (Jan. 1972), doi: 10.1159/000271225. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. J. W. Santrock, Life-span development, 15th ed. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, (2014). Accessed: Dec. 06, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books/about/Life_Span_Development.html?hl=id&id=62tqngEACAAJ [Google Scholar]
  50. Agus Wibowo, Ketrampilan Penalaran Deduktif (Deductive reasoning skills), 1st ed. Semarang: Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  51. Robbie Case, The mind’s staircase: Exploring the conceptual underpinnings of children’s thought and knowledge, 1st ed. New Jersey: Psychology Press, (2013). Accessed: Dec. 06, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=EHJBMbrFxIQC&oi=fnd&pg=PR2&dq=Case,+R.+(1992).+The+Mind%27s+Staircase:+Exploring+the+Conceptual+Underpinnings+of+Children%27s+Thought+and+Knowledge.+Hillsdale,+NJ:+Lawrence+Erlbaum+Associates.&ots=tWIE05lMJ7&sig=hmjsCMsVaW2QtAnHNIuQgN_MgrI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. LS Vygotsky and Michael Cole, Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press, (1978). [Google Scholar]
  53. P. Mishra and M. J. Koehler, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge, Teach Coll Rec, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1017–1054, (Jun. 2006), doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Q. K. L. Ong and N. Annamalai, Technological pedagogical content knowledge for twenty-first century learning skills: the game changer for teachers of industrial revolution 5.0, Educ Inf Technol (Dordr), pp. 1–42, (May 2023), doi: 10.1007/S10639023-11852-Z/METRICS. [Google Scholar]
  55. A. W. Bates and Albert Sangra, Managing Technology in Higher Education: Strategies for Transforming Teaching and Learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  56. C. A. Cottrell and S. L. Neuberg, Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to ‘prejudice, ’ J Pers Soc Psychol, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 770–789, (May 2005), doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. I. Made, D. Mertha Adnyana, N. Luh, and G. Sudaryati, The potency of green education-based blended learning in biology students at the Hindu University of Indonesia, BIO-INOVED : Jurnal Biologi-Inovasi Pendidikan, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–9, (Jan. 2022), doi: 10.20527/BINO.V4I1.11047. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. N. W. Yunita, H. Hobri, E. Oktavianingtyas, S. Sunardi, and E. Yudianto, ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL ARITMETIKA SOSIAL DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS LESSON STUDY FOR LEARNING COMMUNITY DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS, Kadikma, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1–10, (Dec. 2018), doi: 10.19184/KDMA.V9I3.10616. [Google Scholar]
  59. D. R. Dewi, S. Bektiarso, and S. Subiki, Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Disertasi Peta Berpikir 3D Pada Pembelajaran 3D Pada Pembelajaran Fisika, FKIP ePROCEEDING, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 195–202, (Dec. 2019), Accessed: Dec. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/fkip-epro/article/view/15166 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.