EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 600 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 600 (2024) 03001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 600, 2024
The 6th International Geography Seminar (IGEOS 2023)
Article Number 03001
Number of page(s) 7
Section GIS and Remote Sensing Application
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202460003001
Published online 29 November 2024
  1. S. Ghosh, S. Patra, and A. Ghosh, An unsupervised context-sensitive change detection technique based on modified self-organizing feature map neural network. Int. J. Approx. Reason., vol. 50, pp. 37–50, (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Lu, P. Mausel, E. Brondizio, and E. Moran, Change detection techniques. Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 25, pp. 2365–2401. (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Singh, Review article digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 10, pp. 989–1003, 1989. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. H. Chughtai, H. Abbasi, and R. K. Ismail, A review on change detection method and accuracy assessment for land use land cover. Remote Sens. Appl.: Soc. Environ., vol. 100482, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Liu, D. Marinelli, L. Bruzzone, and F. Bovolo, A review of change detection in multitemporal hyperspectral images: Current techniques, applications, and challenges”, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag., vol. 7, pp. 140–158. (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. S. T. Seydi and M. Hasanlou, A new land-cover match-based change detection for hyperspectral imagery. Eur. J. Remote Sens., vol. 50, pp. 517–533, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Guo, W. Shi, M. Hao, and X. Zhu, FSDAF 2.0: Improving the performance of retrieving land cover changes and preserving spatial details. Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 248, pp. 111973, (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Wu, B. Du, and L. Zhang, Hyperspectral anomalous change detection based on joint sparse representation. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 146, pp. 137–150, (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Dalponte, L. Bruzzone, L. Vescovo, and D. Gianelle, The role of spectral resolution and classifier complexity in the analysis of hyperspectral images of forest areas. Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 113, pp. 2345–2355. (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Pignatti, A. Palombo, S. Pascucci, F. Romano, F. Santini, T. Simoniello, A. Umberto, C. Vincenzo, N. Acito, and M. Diani, The PRISMA hyperspectral mission: Science activities and opportunities for agriculture and land monitoring, in Proc. IEEE Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. (IGARSS), pp. 4558–4561. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Lopinto and C. Ananasso, The Prisma hyperspectral mission. in Proc. 33rd EARSeL Symp. Towards Horizon. (2020). [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Kamal and S. Arjasakusuma, “Ekstraksi Informasi Penutup Lahan Menggunakan Spektrometer Lapangan Sebagai Masukan Endmember pada Data Hiperspektral Resolusi Sedang”, Jurnal Ilmiah Geomatika, vol. 16. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Hasanlou and S. T. Seydi, “Hyperspectral change detection: An experimental comparative study”, Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 39, pp. 7029–7083. (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Celik, “Unsupervised change detection in satellite images using principal component analysis and kmeans clustering”, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., vol. 6, pp. 772–776. (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Arjasakusuma, P. Danoedoro, S. Herumurti, Y. A. Nugroho, and P. A. Aryaguna, “Land-Soil Characteristics For Mapping Paddy Cropping Intensity Using Decision Tree Analysis from Single Date ALI Imagery in Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia”, Geoplanning: J. Geomatics Plan., vol. 4, pp. 187–200. (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Arjasakusuma, S. Kusuma, W. Mahendra, and N. Astriviany, “Mapping Paddy Field Extent and Temporal Pattern Variation in a Complex Terrain Area using Sentinel 1-Time Series Data: Case Study of Magelang District, Indonesia”, Int. J. Geoinformatics, vol. 17, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  17. B. Leutner, N. Horning, and M. B. Leutner, “Package ‘RStoolbox’”, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Version 0.1, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Hantson and E. Chuvieco, “Evaluation of different topographic correction methods for Landsat imagery”, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation, vol. 13, pp. 691–700, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. U. Ligges, T. Short, P. Kienzle, S. Schnackenberg, D. Billinghurst, H.-W. Borchers, A. Carezia, P. Dupuis, J. W. Eaton, and E. Farhi, “Package ‘signal’”, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  20. L. W. Lehnert, H. Meyer, W. A. Obermeier, B. Silva, B. Regeling, and J. Bendix, “Hyperspectral data analysis in R: The hsdar package”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.05090, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Arjasakusuma, S. Swahyu Kusuma, and S. Phinn, “Evaluating variable selection and machine learning algorithms for estimating forest heights by combining lidar and hyperspectral data”, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., vol. 9, pp. 507, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.