Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 485, 2024
The 7th Environmental Technology and Management Conference (ETMC 2023)
Article Number 04010
Number of page(s) 8
Section Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448504010
Published online 02 February 2024
  1. A. Easa and A. M. Abou-Rayan, ‘DOMESTIC WASTEWATER EFFECT ON THE POLLUTION OF THE GROUNDWATER IN RURAL AREAS IN EGYPT’, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:13092290. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Odagiri et al., ‘Safely managed on-site sanitation: A national assessment of sanitation services and potential fecal exposure in Indonesia’, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 18, no. 15, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Anil and A. Lali, ‘Modified Septic Tank Treatment System’, Procedia Technol., vol. 24, pp. 240–247, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.05.032. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. V. Va, A. S. Setiyawan, P. Soewondo, and D. W. Putri, ‘Effect of recirculation ratio on the E3S Web Conf., vol. 148, pp. 1–6, 2019, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202014801001. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. F. A. Nasr and B. Mikhaeil, ‘Treatment of domestic wastewater using modified septic tank’, Desalin. Water Treat., no. November, pp. 37–41, 2014, doi: 10.1080/19443994.2014.961174. [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Azuma and T. Hayashi, ‘On-site chlorination responsible for effective disinfection of wastewater from hospital’, Sci. Total Environ., vol. 776, p. 145951, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145951. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. USEPA, ‘Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Manual’, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-06/documents/2004_07_07_septics_septic_2002_osdm_all.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  8. APHA, Standard methods: For the examination of water and waste water, 23RD EDITION. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  9. Metcalf & Eddy and AECOM, Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Resource Recovery, Fifth Edit. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. R. Cizek et al., ‘Comparing the partitioning behavior of Giardia and Cryptosporidium with that of indicator organisms in stormwater runoff’, Water Res., vol. 42, no. 17, pp. 4421–4438, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.06.020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. D. J. Quiñónez-dìaz, M. M. Karpiscak, E. D. Ellman, and C. P. Gerba, ‘Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A : Toxic / Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering REMOVAL OF PATHOGENIC AND INDICATOR MICROORGANISMS BY A CONSTRUCTED WETLAND RECEIVING UNTREATED DOMESTIC WASTEWATER’, J. Environ. Sci. Heal., vol. 7, no. May 2013, pp. 1311–1320, 2001. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. von Sperling, Basic Principles of Wastewater Treatment Volume 2, vol. 2. London: IWA Publishing, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. C. André, L. Debande, and B. S. Marteyn, ‘The selective advantage of facultative anaerobes relies on their unique ability to cope with changing oxygen levels during infection’, Cell. Microbiol., no. December 2020, pp. 1–8, 2021, doi: 10.1111/cmi.13338. [Google Scholar]
  14. [14] R. de Jonge, K. Takumi, W. S. Ritmeester, and F. M. van Leusden, ‘The adaptive response of Escherichia coli O157 in an environment with changing pH’, J. Appl. Microbiol., vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 555–560, Apr. 2003, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01865.x. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. W. G. Quinn, ‘Nematodes learn: now what?’, Nat. Neurosci., vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1639–1640, 2005, doi: 10.1038/nn1205-1639. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Sathasivan, B. S. Herath, S. T. M. L. D. Senevirathna, and G. Kastl, ‘Dechlorination in Wastewater Treatment Processes’, in Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Elsevier B.V., 2017, pp. 359–380. [Google Scholar]
  17. USEPA, ‘Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet Chlorine Disinfection’, Chlorine Disinfection. p. 7, 1999. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.