EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 488 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 488 (2024) 03002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 488, 2024
1st International Conference on Advanced Materials & Sustainable Energy Technologies (AMSET2023)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 22
Section Green Buildings; Carbon Capture & Recycling of Energy Materials
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448803002
Published online 06 February 2024
  1. Housing News Desk, Multi Storey Buildings: Know Classifications and Benefits, https://housing.com/news/multi-storey-buildings/ (2023) [Google Scholar]
  2. Republic of the Philippines, An Act Providing for a Comprehensive Water Quality Management and for Other Purposes, in Republic Act (2004) [Google Scholar]
  3. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Water Quality Guidelines and General Effluent Standards of 2016: DENR Administrative Order No. 2016-08, Retrieved from https://emb.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/DAO-2016-08_WATER-QUALITY-GUIDELINES-AND-GENERAL-EFFLUENT-STANDARDS.pdf (2016) [Google Scholar]
  4. W. Uyaco, Updates on Industrial Wastewater Management in the PHILIPPINES, in The 18th WEPA Annual Meeting (2023) [Google Scholar]
  5. Laguna Lake Development Authority, Memorandum Circular No. 2017-05 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Ganesan, V. Namasivayam, Performance Evaluation of Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs) in Multistoried Buildings, in Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, Vol. 14, No. 4, 891-896 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  7. A. W. Alattabi, C. Harris, R. Alkhaddar, A. Alzeyadi, K. Hashim, Treatment of Residential Complexes’ Wastewater using Environmentally Friendly Technology, in Creative Construction Conference 201, CCC 2017, 19-22 June 2017, Prismoten, Croatia, Prismoten: Procedia Engineering 196, 792-799 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Demirbas, G. Edris, W. M. Alalayah, Sludge production from municipal wastewater treatment in sewage treatment plant, in Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. J. W. Hodgson, Closing in on the confusion about permit-required confined spaces, in Compliance Magazine 13, 6, 16-18 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  10. Sockeye, Five Indicators of Ineffective Planned Maintenance (And How to Detect Them), https://www.getsockeye.com/blog/five-indicators-ineffective-planned-maintenance (2018) [Google Scholar]
  11. A. J. Smalley, D. A. Mauney, Qualitative and quantitative approaches to analyse reliability of a mechatronic system: a case, in J Ind Eng Int 11(2), 253-268 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Mili, S. Bassetto, A. Siadat, M. Tollenaere, Dynamic risk management productivity improvements, in Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 22, 25-34 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Jamshidi, S. A. Rahimi, D. Ait-kadi, A. R. Bartolome, Medical devices Inspection and Maintenance; A Literature Review, in Proceedings of the 2014 Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference (2014) [Google Scholar]
  14. D. E. Dickerson, P. J. Ackerman, Risk-based Maintenance Management of U.S. Public School Facilities, in Procedia Engineering 145, 685-692 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Mancuso, M. Compare, A. Salo, T. Laakso, E. Zio, Risk-based optimization on pipe inspections in large underground networks with imprecise information, in Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Volume 152, 228-238 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. R. M. Chandima Ratnayake, K. Antosz, Risk-based Maintenance Assessment in the Manufacturing Industry: Minimisation of Suboptimal Prioritisation, in Management and Production Engineering Review, Volume 8, No. 1, 38-45 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. O. R. Olakunle, O. A. Koya, C. O. Ogunnigbo, Risk-Based Assessment on Failure Rates of Mechanical Equipment of Public Water Treatment Plants, in International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 9, Issue 8, 1498-1508 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Jaderi, Z. Z. Ibrahim, M. R. Zahiri, Criticality analysis of petrochemical assets using risk based maintenance and the fuzzy inference system, in Process Safety and Environmental Protection 121, 312-325 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. H. Soltanali, A. Rohani, M. H. Abbaspour-Fard, A. Parida, J. T. Farinha, Development of a risk-based maintenance decision making approach for automotive production line, in Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. (2019) [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Rahimian, Risk Management with Maintenance and Repair Strategy in Industries, in Advanced Journal of Chemistry, Section B, 2(4), 239-246 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  21. F. I. Khan, M. M. Haddara, Risk-based maintenance (RBM): a quantitative approach for maintenance/inspection scheduling and planning, in Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 16, 561-573 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. T. C. Nwaoha, Z. Yang, J. Wang, S. Bonsall, Application of genetic algorithm to risk-based maintenance operations of liquefied natural gas carrier systems, in Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering 225(1), 40-52 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. S. J. Pollard, J. Strutt, B. H. MacGillivray, P. D. Hamilton, S. E. Hrudey, Risk Analysis and management in the water utility sector: a review of drivers, tools and techniques, in Process of Saf Environ Prot 82(6), 453-462 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Bertolini, M. Bevilacqua, R. Massini, FMECA approach to product traceability in the food industry, in Food Control 17(2), 137-145 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Hekmatpanah, A. Shanin, N. Ravichandran, The application of FMEA in the oil industry in Iran: the case of four litre oil canning process of Sepahan Oil Company, in Afr J Bus Manag 5(7), 3019 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  26. A. C. Cagliano, S. Grimaldi, C. Rafele, A systematic methodology for risk management in healthcare sector, Saf Sci 49(5), 695-708 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. H. R. Feili, N. Akar, H. Loftizadeh, M. Bairampour, S. Nasiri, Risk analysis of geothermal plants using failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) technique, in Energy Conver Manag 72, 69-76 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. H. C. Liu, P. Li, J. X. You, Y. Z. Chen, A novel approach for FMEA: combination of interval 2-tuple linguistic variables and gray relational analysis, in Qual. Relia. Eng. Int. 31 (5), 761-772 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. N. Chanamool, T. Naenna, Fuzzy FMEA application to improve decision-making process in an emergency department, in Appl Soft Comput 43, 441-452 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. M. S. Kirkire, S. B. Rane, J. R. Jadhav, Risk management in medical product development process using traditional FMEA and fuzzy linguistic approach: a case study, in J. Ind. Eng. Int. 11 (4), 595-611 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. S. K. Oluwatoyin, F. M. Hashim, H. B. Hussin, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis of Subsea Multiphase Pump Equipment, in MATEC Web of Conferences 13, (EDP Sciences, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  32. ANLET Co., Ltd., ANLET 3 Lobes Blower & Vacuum Pump: Manual (n.d.) [Google Scholar]
  33. Philippine Statistics Authority, Retrieved from https://psa.gov.ph/content/quezon-city-philippines-largest-city (2022) [Google Scholar]
  34. EMPORIS, Retrieved from https://www.emporis.com/city/100390/quezon-city-philippines/type/high-rise-buildings (2022) [Google Scholar]
  35. F. Clegg, Simple Statistics, in Cambridge University Press (1998) [Google Scholar]
  36. N. Blaikie, Analyzing Quantitative Data, in SAGE Publication Ltd. (2003) [Google Scholar]
  37. G. M. Sullivan, A. R. Artino, Analyzing and Interpreting Data From Likert-Type Scales, in Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 541-542, Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3886444 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  38. S. Jamieson, Likert scales: how to (ab)use them, in Med Educ. 38(12), 1217-1218 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  39. A. Alshamrani, A. Bahattab, A Comparison Between Three SLDC Models Waterfall Model, Spiral Model, and Incremental/Iterative Model, IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Volume 12, Issue 1, No 1, 106-111 (2015) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.