Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 491, 2024
International Conference on Environmental Development Using Computer Science (ICECS’24)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 04014 | |
| Number of page(s) | 11 | |
| Section | Engineering for Environment Development Applications | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202449104014 | |
| Published online | 21 February 2024 | |
- S.F.Azar, (2000) “Multiattribute Decision-Making: Use of Three Scoring Methods to Compare the Performance of Imaging Techniques for Breast Cancer Detection”, Technical Report, 1-24. [Google Scholar]
- T.O. Boucher, and E.L.McStravic, (1991) “Multi-attribute Evaluation Within a Present Value Framework and its Relation to the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, The Engineering Economist, 37:55-71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S.J. Chen, and C.L. Hwang, (1992) “Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems”, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
- J.Y. Dong, and S.P. Wan, (2015) “Max-min and Min-max Gray Association Degree-based Method for Multiattribute Decision Making”, Journal of Intelligent Systems, 24(4):525-531. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. Kahraman, B. Semra, and V. Yenen Zeki, (2008) “Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making”, Springer Optimization and its Applications, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
- S.Kumar, R.P. Badoni, and P.J. Mohan, (2017) “Application of MADM Methods for Selecting the Best Private Institution for Professional Courses in Uttarakhand State, India”, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Research in Intelligent and Computing in Engineering, 10:229-233. [Google Scholar]
- G. Nirmala, and N. Vanitha, (2014) “Multi-Attribute Decision Making Model with Fuzzy Graph and Its Characteristics”, IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM), 76-80. [Google Scholar]
- E. Triantaphyllou, B. Shu, S. Sanchez, and T. Ray, (1998) “Multi-Criteria Decision Making: An Operations Research Approach”, Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 15:175-186. [Google Scholar]
- Z.Xu, (2015), “Uncertain Multi-Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications”, Springer. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C.L.Hwang, and K. Yoon, (1981) “Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications”, Springer, Berlin. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B.N.Kore, K. Ravi, and S.B. Patil, (2017) “A Simplified Description of Fuzzy TOPSIS Method For Multi Criteria Decision Making”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 4(5):1-4. [Google Scholar]
- P.K. Parida, and S.K. Sahoo, (2013) “Multiple Attributes Decision Making Approach by TOPSIS Technique”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 2(11):907-912. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Z.Pei, and L. Zheng, (2010) “A note to TOPSIS method in MADM problems under fuzzy environment”, Proceedings of the IEEE, 10:3-31. [Google Scholar]
- I.M. Sharaf, (2017) “TOPSIS with similarity measure for MADM applied to network selection”, Computational and Applied Mathematics, 37(4):4104-4121. [Google Scholar]
- H. Garg, A. Keikha, and H. MishmastNehi, (2020). Multiple-attribute decision-making problem using TOPSIS and choquetintegralwithhesitant fuzzy number information. Mathematical problems in engineering, 2020. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.