EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 495 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 495 (2024) 01007 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 495, 2024
2nd International Colloquium on Youth, Environment and Sustainability (ICYES 2023)
Article Number 01007
Number of page(s) 10
Section Economy, Energy, and Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202449501007
Published online 23 February 2024
  1. Badan Pusat Statistik, “Perekonomian Global dan Mitra Dagang Utama,” (2023), [Online]. Available: https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2023/02/06/1997/ekonomi-indonesia-tahun-2022-tumbuh-5-31-persen.htmlhtml [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Q. Al-amin and B. Doberstein, “COP Adoption, Implications and Projections of Climate Change Mitigation Policy for ASEAN Region,” Clim. Change, pp. 1–18, (2021), [Online]. Available: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-549288/v1 [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Holden, K. Linnerud, and D. Banister, “The Imperatives of Sustainable Development,” Sustain. Dev., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 213–226, (2017), doi: 10.1002/sd.1647. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. D. S. Hutajulu, T. Revina, and M. D. Dermawan, “Decarbonization Program through an Implementation of 411 kWp OFFGRID PV Rooftop in reducing GHG in Muara Karang Combined Cycle Power Plant,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1199, no. 1, p. 012018, (2023), doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1199/1/012018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Indonesia, “Enhanced NDC Indonesia,” p. 282, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  6. R. S. Noralene Uy, “Chapter 16 Climate change adaptation in ASEAN: Actions and challenges” In Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction: Issues and Challenges,” Clim. Chang. Adapt. Disaster Risk Reduct., pp. 349–368, (2015), doi: 10.1787/3edc8d09-en. [Google Scholar]
  7. IPCC, “Managing Climate Extremes and Disasters for Ecosystems : Lessons from the IPCC SREX report Contents,” p. 36, (2012), [Online]. Available: https://www.cdkn.org/srex [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Lowitzsch, K. Kreutzer, J. George, C. Croonenbroeck, and B. Breitschopf, “Development prospects for energy communities in the EU identifying best practice and future opportunities using a morphological approach,” Energy Policy, vol. 174, p. 113414, Mar. (2023), doi: 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2022.113414. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. PT. PLN (PERSERO), “Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (RUPTL) PT PLN (Persero) 2021-2030.,” Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga List. 2021-2030, pp. 2019–2028, (2021). [Google Scholar]
  10. K. E. D. S. D. M. R. INDONESIA, “Kapasitas Terpasang EBT Capai 12,7 GW, Ini Gerak Cepat Pemerintah Serap Potensi EBT,” SIARAN PERS NOMOR: 310.Pers/04/SJI/2023. Accessed: Nov. 11, (2023). [Online]. Available: https://ebtke.esdm.go.id/post/2023/07/24/3536/kapasitas.terpasang.ebt.capai.127.gw.ini.gerak.cepat.p emerintah.serap.potensi.ebt [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Moriarty and D. Honnery, “Ecosystem maintenance energy and the need for a green EROI,” Energy Policy, vol. 131, no. March, pp. 229–234, (2019), doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. I. Capellan-Perez, C. de Castro, and L. J. Miguel Gonzalez, “Dynamic Energy Return on Energy Investment (EROI) and material requirements in scenarios of global transition to renewable energies,” Energy Strateg. Rev., vol. 26, no. September 2018, p. 100399, (2019), doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2019.100399. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. R. Wardhana and W. H. Marifatullah, “Transisi Indonesia Menuju Energi Terbarukan,” J. Tashwirul Afkar, vol. 38, no. 02, pp. 274–275, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Christodoulou and K. Cullinane, “Identifying the main opportunities and challenges from the implementation of a port energy management system: A SWOT/PESTLE analysis,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 21, (2019), doi: 10.3390/su11216046. [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Song, Y. Sun, and L. Jin, “PESTEL analysis of the development of the waste-to-energy incineration industry in China,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 80, no. May, pp. 276–289, (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.066. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Sugiyono, I. Febijanto, E. Hilmawan, and Adiarso, “Potential of biomass and coal co-firing power plants in Indonesia: a PESTEL analysis,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 963, no. 1, (2022), doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/963/1/012007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. W. Yudha, B. Tjahjono, and A. Kolios, “A PESTLE policy mapping and stakeholder analysis of Indonesia’s fossil fuel energy industry,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1–22, (2018), doi: 10.3390/en11051272. [Google Scholar]
  18. V. Mytilinou, A. J. Kolios, and G. Di Lorenzo, “A comparative multi-disciplinary policy review in wind energy developments in Europe,” Int. J. Sustain. Energy, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 754–774, (2017), doi: 10.1080/14786451.2015.1100194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. I. ICSU, Review of Targets for the Sustainable Development Goals: The Science Perspective, no. 2015. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  20. K. H. dan H. A. M. R. Indonesia, “Rencana Umum Energi Nasional Lampiran I Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia,” Peraturan.Bpk.Go.Id, (2017), [Online]. Available: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/68772 [Google Scholar]
  21. R. B. Swain and A. Karimu, “Renewable electricity and sustainable development goals in the EU,” World Dev., vol. 125, p. 104693, (2020), doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104693. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Chen, A. Sinha, K. Hu, and M. I. Shah, “Impact of technological innovation on energy efficiency in industry 4.0 era: Moderation of shadow economy in sustainable development,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 164, no. October 2020, p. 120521, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.(2020).120521. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Afful-Dadzie, A. Mallett, and E. Afful-Dadzie, “The challenge of energy transition in the Global South: The case of electricity generation planning in Ghana,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 126, no. September 2019, p. 109830, (2020), doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109830. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Afful-Dadzie, S. K. Mensah, and E. Afful- Dadzie, “Ghana renewable energy master plan: The benefits of private sector participation,” Sci. African, vol. 17, p. e01353, (2022), doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01353. [Google Scholar]
  25. PT. Perusahaan Listrik Negara, “Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik 2019-2028,” PT. Perusah. List. Negara, pp. 2019–2028, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  26. Y. A. Iskandar, “Skenario pembiayaan transisi energi indonesia,” Bul. Pertamina Energy Inst., vol. 9 Nomor 2, no. October, (2023). [Google Scholar]
  27. IESR (2022). Indonesia, (2022). Available: http://www.irena.org28. A. H. Mulia, S. Wukirasih, and W. H. Suryadinata, “Whither Just Transition ? A Case Study of Energy Transition Mechanism ( ETM ) Country Platform in Indonesia,” pp. 31–46, (2022), doi: https://doi.org/10.22146/globalsouth.81111. [Google Scholar]
  28. I. R. I. for D. (IRID), “Just Energy Transition Partnership ( JETP ) Indonesia,” (2022), [Online]. Available: https://irid.or.id/publication [Google Scholar]
  29. D. Komisioner and O. Jasa, “Perdagangan Karbon Melalui Bursa Karbon,” (2023). [Google Scholar]
  30. G. T. Tucho and D. M. Kumsa, “Challenges of Achieving Sustainable Development Goal 7 From the Perspectives of Access to Modern Cooking Energy in Developing Countries,” Front. Energy Res., vol. 8, no. November, pp. 1–11, (2020), doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2020.564104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. F. N. Haryadi, D. F. Hakam, S. R. Ajija, A. A. Simaremare, and I. A. Aditya, “The analysis of residential rooftop PV in Indonesia’s electricity market,” Economies, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1–10, (2021), doi: 10.3390/economies9040192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. A. Raihan, “An overview of the energy segment of Indonesia: present situation, prospects, and forthcoming advancements in renewable energy technology,” J. Technol. Innov. Energy, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 37–63, (2023), doi: 10.56556/jtie.v2i3.599. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. A. P. Sukarso and K. N. Kim, “Cooling effect on the floating solar PV: Performance and economic analysis on the case of west Java province in Indonesia,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 9, (2020), doi: 10.3390/en13092126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. B. P. S. R. Indonesia, “Luas Penutupan Lahan Indonesia Di Dalam Dan Di Luar Kawasan Hutan Tahun 2014-2021 Menurut Kelas (Ribu Ha),” Badan Pusat Statistik. Accessed: Nov. 11, (2023). [Online]. Available: https://www.bps.go.id/statictable/2020/02/17/2084/luas-penutupan-lahan-indonesia-di-dalam-dan-diluar-kawasan-hutan-tahun-2014-2021-menurutkelas-ribu-ha-.html [Google Scholar]
  35. E. Solomin, E. Sirotkin, E. Cuce, S. P. Selvanathan, and S. Kumarasamy, “Hybrid floating solar plant designs: A review,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1–25, (2021), doi: 10.3390/en14102751. [Google Scholar]
  36. V. L. Trinh and C. K. Chung, “Renewable energy for SDG-7 and sustainable electrical production, integration, industrial application, and globalization: Review,” Cleaner Engineering and Technology, vol. 15. Elsevier Ltd, Aug. 01, (2023). doi: 10.1016/j.clet.2023.100657. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. N. Manoj Kumar, S. S. Chopra, A. A. Chand, R. M. Elavarasan, and G. M. Shafiullah, “Hybrid renewable energy microgrid for a residential community: A techno-economic and environmental perspective in the context of the SDG7,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1–30, (2020), doi: 10.3390/SU12103944. [Google Scholar]
  38. Z. Wu, A. Hou, C. Chang, and X. Huang, “Environmental Science Environmental impacts of large-scale CSP plants in,” Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts, vol. 16, pp. 2432–2441, (2014), doi: 10.1039/C4EM00235K. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. L. Abou, E. L. Kouroum, L. Bahi, and A. Bahi, “ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS OF CONCENTRATED SOLAR POWER PLANTS IN,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Enginerring Technol., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 461–468, (2020), doi: 10.34218/IJARET.11.5.2020.047. [Google Scholar]
  40. G. Diogo, P. Da, D. Alves, and C. Branco, “Is floating photovoltaic better than conventional photovoltaic ? Assessing environmental impacts environmental impacts,” Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 390–400, (2018), doi: 10.1080/14615517.2018.1477498 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.