Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 495, 2024
2nd International Colloquium on Youth, Environment and Sustainability (ICYES 2023)
Article Number 02004
Number of page(s) 9
Section Ecology and Microbiology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202449502004
Published online 23 February 2024
  1. D. Mitten, J. R. Overholt, F. I. Haynes, C. C. D’Amore, and J. C. Ady, “Hiking: A Low-Cost, Accessible Intervention to Promote Health Benefits,” American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, vol. 12, no. 4. SAGE Publications Inc., pp. 302–310, Jul. 01, 2018. doi: 10.1177/1559827616658229. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Goldenberg and K. E. Soule, “Outcomes of hiking the pacific crest trail,” Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 44–54, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.7768/1948-5123.1177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. T. G. Coble, S. W. Selin, and B. B. Erickson, “Hiking alone: Understanding fear, negotiation strategies and leisure experience,” J Leis Res, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2003, doi: 10.18666/jlr-2003-v35-i1-608. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. C. C. Geisler, B. O. Martinson, and E. A. Wilkening, “Outdoor Recreation and Environmental Concern: A Restudy,” Rural Sociological Society, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 241–249, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  5. K. P. Tam, “Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences,” J Environ Psychol, vol. 34, pp. 64–78, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. E. K. Nisbet, J. M. Zelenski, and S. A. Murphy, “Happiness is in our Nature: Exploring Nature Relatedness as a Contributor to Subjective Well-Being,” J Happiness Stud, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 303–322, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Singarimbun, E. Z. Gaffar, and P. Tofani, “Modeling of reservoir structure by using magnetotelluric method in the area of Mt. Argopuro, East Java, Indonesia,” Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 833–847, 2017, doi: 10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2017.49.6.9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. N. Ayu Aryanti et al., “STATUS KONSERVASI JENIS BURUNG DI KAWASAN LERENG GUNUNG ARGOPURO, PROBOLINGGO Conservation Status of Birds around Argopura Mountain, Probolinggo,” 2017. [Online]. Available: http://research-report.umm.ac.id/index.php/ [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Hansen, “Communication, media and environment: Towards reconnecting research on the production, content and social implications of environmental communication,” Int Commun Gaz, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 7–25, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1177/1748048510386739. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. V. Nazarenko and A. I. Kolesnik, “Raising environmental awareness of future teachers,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 63–76, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.12973/iji.2018.1135a. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. I. E. Palmberg and J. Kuru, “Outdoor activities as a basis for environmental responsibility,” Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 32–36, 2000, doi: 10.1080/00958960009598649. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Cox, “Nature’s ‘Crisis Disciplines’: Does Environmental Communication Have an Ethical Duty?,” Environ Commun, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–20, May 2007, doi: 10.1080/17524030701333948. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. R. R. Jurin, D. Roush, and J. Danter, Environmental communication: Skills and principles for natural resource managers, scientists, and engineers. Springer Netherlands, 2010. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-3987-3. [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Seitz, T. P. Wagner, and L. Lindenfeld, “Environmental Communication as a Nexus,” Proceedings of the 10th Biennial Conference on Communication., no. University of Maine, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Cox and P. C. Pezzullo, Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere. California: SAGE Publications India Pvt, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Steele, The sense of place. Boston: CBI, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  17. F. van Staden, “Implementing Socially Responsive Forestry Extension Programmes: Towards A Model,” Southern Africa Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 16, pp. 3–9, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Ferreira, “Environmental education through hiking: A qualitative investigation,” Environ Educ Res, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 177–185, 1998, doi: 10.1080/1350462980040205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Cole, “Fostering Ecological Awareness : Art and Learning ,” Child Educ, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 285–289, Aug. 1992, doi: 10.1080/00094056.1992.10521767. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. J. A. Corraliza and S. Collado, “Ecological awareness and children’s environmental experience,” Papeles del Psicologo, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 190–196, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.23923/pap.psicol2019.2896. [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Sarco-Thomas, “Improvising in Ruyang: Community Art as Ecological Practice,” Journal of Arts and Communities, vol. 1, no. 1, 2009, doi: 10.1386/jaac.1.1.45/1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. St and T. P. Maxwell, “Considering Spirituality INTEGRAL SPIRITUALITY, DEEP SCIENCE, AND ECOLOGICAL AWARENESS,” Zygon, vol. 38, no. 2, 2003, [Online]. Available: http://www.worldwatch.org [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Berkes, “Environmental governance for the anthropocene? Social-ecological systems, resilience, and collaborative learning,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 9, no. 7, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.3390/su9071232. [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Gifford and A. Nilsson, “Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review,” International Journal of Psychology, vol. 49, no. 3. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 141–157, 2014. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12034. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed. California: Sage Publications, Inc, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  26. R. K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Method, 5th ed. California: SAGE, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  27. J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publication, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  28. J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. London: SAGE Publications, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  29. H. Sun, Q. Zhang, W. Guo, and K. Lin, “Hikers’ pro-environmental behavior in national park: Integrating theory of planned behavior and norm activation theory,” Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, vol. 5, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2022.1068960. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. E. Hill, M. Goldenberg, and B. Freidt, “Benefits of Hiking: A Means-End Approach on the Appalachian Trail,” Journal of Unconventional Parks, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 19–27, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/hms_fac_pubs/89 [Google Scholar]
  31. L. Filipova, Ecocriticism and the Sense of Place. New York: Routledge, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www. [Google Scholar]
  32. L. Steg and C. Vlek, “Encouraging proenvironmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda.,” J Environ Psychol, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 309–317, 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. W. Abrahamse, L. Steg, C. Vlek, and T. Rothengatter, “A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation,” J Environ Psychol, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 273–291, 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. K. Fretwell and A. Greig, “Towards a better understanding of the relationship between individual’s self-reported connection to nature, personal well-being and environmental awareness,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 5, p. 1386, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11051386. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. A. G. Flor, Environmental communication: Principles, approaches and strategies of communication applied to environmental management. Quezon: University of Philippines Open University., 2004. [Google Scholar]
  36. U. Sundar Harris, “Engaging communities in environmental communication,” PACIFIC JOURNALISM REVIEW, vol. 23, no. 1, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  37. P. Chhetri, C. Arrowsmith, and M. Jackson, “Determining hiking experiences in naturebased tourist destinations,” Tour Manag, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 31–43, 2004, doi: 10.1016/S0261-5177(03)00057-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.