Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 500, 2024
The 1st International Conference on Environment, Green Technology, and Digital Society (INTERCONNECTS 2023)
Article Number 05004
Number of page(s) 7
Section Social Sciences, Humanities, and Economics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450005004
Published online 11 March 2024
  1. H. S. Disemadi, “Urgensi Regulasi Khusus dan Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligencedalam Mewujudkan Perlindungan Data Pribadi di Indonesia,” Wawasan Yuridika, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 177-199, 2021, doi: 10.25072/jwy.v5i2.460. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Montoya and P. Rivas, “Government AI readiness meta-analysis for Latin America and the Caribbean,” 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS). IEEE, pp. 1-8, 2019. doi: 10.1109/istas48451.2019.8937869. [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 57, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Nuryanto, “Tantangan Administrasi Publik di Dunia Artificial Intelligence dan Bot,” Jejaring Adm. Publik, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 139-147, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.20473/jap.v12i2.30882. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. P. W. Yudoprakoso, “Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) Sebagai Alat Bantu Proses Penyusunan Undang-Undang dalam Upaya Menghadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0 di Indonesia,” Simp. Huk. Indones., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 450-461, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Mowbray, P. Chung, and G. Greenleaf, “Utilising AI in the legal assistance sector— Testing a role for legal information institutes,” Comput. Law Secur. Rev., vol. 38, p. 105407, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105407. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Juriloo, “Free legal aid - a human right,” Nord. J. Hum. Rights, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 203-219, 2015, doi: 10.1080/18918131.2015.1066143. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Angga and R. Arifin, “Penerapan Bantuan Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Kurang Mampu di Indonesia,” Divers. J. Huk., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 218-236, 2018, doi: 10.32503/diversi.v4i2.374. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zulkarnaini, “Implementasi Standar Layanan Bantuan Hukum oleh Advokat dalam Memberikan Bantuan Hukum Cuma-Cuma Bagi Klien Kurang Mampu (Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2011 Tentang Bantuan Hukum),” Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  10. Nurhidayati, Maharani, and F. Lubis, “Implementasi Bantuan Hukum Pro Bono Dan Pro Deo Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia,” AS- SYAR ’ I J. Bimbing. Konseling Kel., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 569-581, 2023, doi: 10.47476/assyari.v5i3.2791. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Many and A. Sofian, “Bantuan Hukum Cuma-Cuma (Pro Bono) Sebagai Perwujudan Akses Keadilan Bagi Masyarakat Miskin Di Indonesia,” Media Inf. Penelit. Kesejaht. Sos., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 289-278, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  12. H. A. Hakim, Y. Kurniaty, J. Krisnan, and C. B. E. Praja, “Artificial intellegence and medicine: Proposed model of Indonesian criminal liability,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2023, vol. 2706, no. 2023. doi: 10.1063/5.0120265. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Naiborhu, F. A.-Z. Jambak, and F. Lubis, “Peran Pemerintah dalam Proses Pemberian Bantuan Hukum secara Prodeo,” AS- SYAR ’ I J. Bimbing. Konseling Kel., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 387-398, 2023, doi: 10.47476/assyari.v5i2.2672. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. R. H. Soemitro, Hukum dan perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi di dalam masyarakat: pidato pengukuhan diucapkan pada guru besar tetap pada. Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  15. D. E. Prasetio and H. Widodo, “Ius Constituendum Pengujian Formil Dalam Perubahan Konstitusi,” AL-MANHAJ J. Huk. dan Pranata Sos. Islam, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2022, doi: 10.37680/almanhaj.v4i1.1478. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. F. K. Fachri, “Pertama di Dunia, ‘Robot Lawyer’ Penasihat Hukum Terdakwa di Persidangan AS,” HukumOnline, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  17. R. P. Wardani, “Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) Sebagai Alat Bantu Proses Penyusunan Undang-Undang Dalam Upaya Menghadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0 Di Indonesia,” Universitas Bina Darma, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  18. J. C. Gellers, Rights for Robots Artificial Intelligence, Animal and Environmental Law, 1st Editio. London: Routledge, 2020. doi: 10.4324/9780429288159. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Putranti and K. D. Anggraeny, “Inventor ’ s Legal Liability upon the Invention of Artificial Intelligence in Indonesia,” Varia Justicia, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 71-83, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. F. Y. P. Amboro and K. Komarhana, “Prospek Kecerdasan Buatan Sebagai Subjek Hukum Perdata di Indonesia,” Law Rev., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 145-172, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Y. Prianto, V. K. Sumantri, and P. Y. Sasmita, “Pros and Cons of AI Robot as a Legal Subject,” Educ. Humanit., vol. 439, no. Ticash 2019, pp. 380-387, 2020, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.200515.067. [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Kusumawati, “Kecerdasan Buatan Manusia (Artificial Intelligence); Teknologi Impian Masa Depan,” ULUL ALBAB J. Stud. Islam, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 257-274, 2018, doi: 10.18860/ua.v9i2.6218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Jaya and W. Goh, “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Kedudukan Kecerdasan Buatan Atau Artificial Intelligence Sebagai Subjek Hukum Pada Hukum Positif Indonesia,” Supremasi Huk., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1-11, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  24. P. M. Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  25. D. D. Machmudin and H. R. O. S. Soemadiningrat, Pengantar ilmu hukum: sebuah sketsa. Bandung: Rafika Aditama, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  26. H. A. Hakim et al., “The Urgency on Designing the Legislation for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Indonesian Medical Practice,” J. Penelit. Huk. Jure, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 541-550, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.