Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 504, 2024
Journées Scientifiques AGAP Qualité 2024
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 20
Section Géotechnique
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450404001
Published online 26 March 2024
  1. Jomard, H., Cushing, E. M., Palumbo, L., Baize, S., David, C., and Chartier, T.: Transposing an active fault database into a seismic hazard fault model for nuclear facilities - Part 1: Building a database of potentially active faults (BDFA) for metropolitan France, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1573–1584, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1573-2017, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  2. Lankston R.W., Lankston M.M., 1986, Obtaining multilayer reciprocal times through phantoming, Geophysics, 51, 45–49. [Google Scholar]
  3. Palmer D., 1981, An Introduction to the generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation: Geophysics, 46, no. 11, 1508–1518, DOI: 10.1190/1.1441157. [Google Scholar]
  4. Palmer D., 2001, Digital processing of shallow seismic refraction data with the refraction, A Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Geology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. [Google Scholar]
  5. Park C. B., Miller R.D. and J. Xia, 1999, Multichannel analysis of surface waves: Geophysics, 64, no. 3, 800–808, DOI: 10.1190/1.1444590. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rawlinson N., Pozgay S., Fishwick S., 2010, Seismic tomography: A window into deep Earth. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 178(3), 101–135. [Google Scholar]
  7. Radogna, P. V., Vergniault, C., & Dupuy, D. (2022a). Case: high-definition bedrock depth and conditions for urban construction project site evaluation in Switzerland using seismic refraction with combined GRM and tomographic approach. In Engineering Geophysics (pp. 201–203). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003184676-30 [Google Scholar]
  8. Radogna, P. V., & Vergniault, C. (2022b). Case: geometrical complex ground model for large industrial construction sites: ultra-high-resolution with shear waves - qualification flow and application. In Engineering Geophysics (pp. 249–254). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003184676-40. [Google Scholar]
  9. Vergniault C., Dubié F., Girard B., Rénalier F., 2018, Retour d’expérience sur l’utilisation des méthodes géophysiques par ondes de surface (MASW et bruit de fond) pour les études de stabilité dynamique des digues du canal de la Durance, Colloque CFBR 2018. [Google Scholar]
  10. Vergniault C., Strobbia C., Deida G.P., Dupuy D., 2019, Comparaison des méthodes sismiques de surface, afin d’imager les premiers décamètres du sous-sol, Journées scientifiques de l’AGAP 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. Vergniault C., Buchoud E., Boisson-Gaboriau J., Hallier A., 2022, Application des méthodes géophysiques pour le diagnostic de l’aléa cavités sur des ouvrages de grands linéaires, en contexte ferroviaire et hydraulique, Revue Française de Géotechnique (en révision). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.