Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 505, 2024
3rd International Conference on Applied Research and Engineering (ICARAE2023)
Article Number 01023
Number of page(s) 9
Section Materials Science
Published online 25 March 2024
  1. Sultan, M. Hydroxyapatite/polyurethane composites as promising biomaterials. 2018; [Google Scholar]
  2. Balguri P.K., Samuel D.G.H., Thumu, U. A review on mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Mater today Proc. 2020;44:346–355. [Google Scholar]
  3. Krishnaja, D., Cheepu, M., & Venkateswarlu, D. (2018, March). A review of research progress on dissimilar laser weld-brazing of automotive applications. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 330, p. 012073). IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang X., Xu S., Zhou S., et al. Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: A review. Biomaterials. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kodli B.K., Karre R., Saxena K.K., et al. Flow behaviour of tiHy 600 alloy under hot deformation using gleeble 3800. Adv Mater Process technol. 2017; [Google Scholar]
  6. McBeath R., Pirone D.M., Nelson C.M., et al. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitmenT. Dev Cell. 2004;6:483–495. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Saxena K.K., Awasthi A.. Novel Additive Manufacturing Processes and techniques in Industry 4.0. 2020;439–455. Available from: [Google Scholar]
  8. Xie H., Zhang L., Xu E., et al. SiAlON-Al2O3 ceramics as potential biomaterials. Ceram InT. 2019;45:16809–16813. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gupta, T.K., Budarapu, P.R., Chappidi, S.R., Yb, S.S., Paggi, M., & Bordas, S.P. (2019). Advances in carbon based nanomaterials for bio-medical applications. Current Medicinal Chemistry, 26(38), 6851–6877. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Yue L., Jayapal M., Cheng X., et al. Highly dispersed ultra-small nano Sn-SnSb nanoparticles anchored on N-doped graphene sheets as high performance anode for sodium ion batteries. Appl Surf Sci. 2020;512:145686. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vila-Parrondo C., García-Astrain, C., Liz-Marzán, L.M. Colloidal systems toward 3D cell culture scaffolds. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;283. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bose S., Ke D., Sahasrabudhe H., et al. Additive manufacturing of biomaterials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yadav S., Yamasani P., Kumar S.. Experimental studies on a micro power generator using thermo-electric modules mounted on a micro-combustor. Energy Convers Manag. 2015;99:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  14. Huh, D., Hamilton, G.A., & Ingber, D.E. (2011). From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips. Trends in cell biology, 21(12), 745–754. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jaffery H.A., Sabri M.F.M., Said S.M., et al. Electrochemical corrosion behavior of Sn-0.7Cu solder alloy with the addition of bismuth and iron. J Alloys Compd. 2019;810:151925. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rice J.J., Martino M.M., Scott E.A., et al. Controlled Release Strategies in tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng Second Ed. 2014;347–392. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chandrappa, V., Basavapoornima, C., Kesavulu, C.R., Babu, A.M., Depuru, S.R., & Jayasankar, C.K. (2022). Spectral studies of Dy3+: zincphosphate glasses for white light source emission applications: a comparative study. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 583, 121466. [Google Scholar]
  18. Singh, B., Saxena, K.K., & Roy, T. (2023). Opportunities and challenges in machining of aluminium metal matrix composites using electrical discharge machining. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 09544089231213861. [Google Scholar]
  19. Awasthi A., Saxena K.K., Arun V.. Sustainable and smart metal forming manufacturing process. Mater today Proc. 2021;44:2069–2079. [Google Scholar]
  20. Arun V., Singh A.K., Shukla N.K., et al. Design and performance analysis of SOA-MZI based reversible toffoli and irreversible AND logic gates in a single photonic circuiT. Opt Quantum Electron. 2016;48:1–15. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kumar P.S.S., Allamraju K.V.. A Review Of Natural Fiber Composites [Jute, Sisal, Kenaf]. Mater today Proc. 2019;18:2556–2562. [Google Scholar]
  22. Atchudan R., Jebakumar Immanuel Edison, Shanmugam, M., et al. Sustainable synthesis of carbon quantum dots from banana peel waste using hydrothermal process for in vivo bioimaging. Phys E Low-dimensional Syst Nanostructures. 2021;126:114417. [Google Scholar]
  23. Saxena, K.K., & Awasthi, A. (2020). Novel Additive Manufacturing Processes and techniques in Industry 4.0. In Handbook of Research on Integrating Industry 4.0 in Business and Manufacturing (pp. 439–455). IGI Global. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kalpana G., Kumar P. V., Aljawarneh, S., et al. Shifted Adaption Homomorphism Encryption for Mobile and Cloud Learning. Comput Electr Eng. 2018;65:178–195. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sharma K., Mujawar M.A., Kaushik A.. State-of-Art Functional Biomaterials for tissue Engineering. FronT. Mater. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  26. Arun V., Shukla N.K., Singh A.K., et al. Design and performance analysis of multiple all optical logic gates in a single photonic circuiT. Opt Quantum Electron. 2016;48:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  27. Li Y., Yang C., Zhao H., et al. New developments of ti-based alloys for biomedical applications. Materials (Basel). 2014. [Google Scholar]
  28. Grover, T., Pandey, A., Kumari, S.T., et al. Role of titanium in bio implants and additive manufacturing: An overview. Mater today Proc. 2020; [Google Scholar]
  29. Nyman J.S., Roy A., Reyes M.J., et al. Mechanical behavior of human cortical bone in cycles of advancing tensile strain for two age groups. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A. 2009; [Google Scholar]
  30. Sinha A., Kumar Rajak D., Shaik N.B., et al. A review on 4D printing of Nickel-titanium smart alloy processing, the effect of major parameters and their biomedical applications. Proc. InsT. Mech. Eng. Part E J. Process Mech. Eng. SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England; 2023. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chary, T.R.G., Potnuru, S., Immanuel, R.J., Saxena, K.K., Buddhi, D., & Behera, A. (2023). Dissimilar metal welding on Mg AZ31 and AA 6061 alloys by using friction stir welding. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 17(6), 2913–2918. [Google Scholar]
  32. Grover, T., Pandey, A., Kumari, S.T., Awasthi, A., Singh, B., Dixit, P., … & Saxena, K.K. (2020). Role of titanium in bio implants and additive manufacturing: An overview. Materials today: Proceedings, 26, 3071–3080. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wu S., Liu X., Yeung K.W.K., et al. Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Reports. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  34. P. Sonia, J.K. Jain, K.K. Saxena, J. Lade, V. Malik, and R. Singh, “Fabrication and characterization of magnesium-based mg-titania surface composite for bioimplants,” Surf. rev. letT., vol. 0, no. 0, p. 2340003, DOI: 10.1142/s0218625x23400036. [Google Scholar]
  35. Pankaj, Sonia, Jinesh K. Jain, Naveenkrishna, Alla, Manish Gupta, Md Irfanul Haque, Siddiqui, Karrar Hazim, Salem, Farooq, Ahmed & Sherzod Shukhratovich, Abdullaev (2023) Friction stir processing of AZ31 alloy to improve the mechanical, biodegradation, and in vitro biocompatible characteristics, Journal of Adhesion Science and technology, DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2023.2283969 [Google Scholar]
  36. P. Sonia, J.K. Jain, and K.A. Mohammed, “A Review of Magnesium Based MMC Fabrication techniques for Biomedical Applications,” Key Eng. Mater., vol. 924, pp. 141–150, 2022, DOI: 10.4028/p-g66wl1. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pankaj Sonia & Jinesh K Jain & Kuldeep Kumar Saxena & Vinayak Malik, 2023. “Surface Modification And Surface Composites Development techniques For Biocompatible And Biodegradable Alloys,” Surface Review and Letters (SRL), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 30(11), pages 1–16, November. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.