Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 505, 2024
3rd International Conference on Applied Research and Engineering (ICARAE2023)
Article Number 01030
Number of page(s) 11
Section Materials Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450501030
Published online 25 March 2024
  1. A. Marcus, J. Jean, Going Green at Home: the Green Machining. Information Design Journal 17(3) (2009), 235–245. [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Nancy, C. Seungchoun, H. Moneer, Machine tool Design and Operation Strategies for Green Manufacturing. Proceedings of 4th CIRP International Conference on High Performance Cutting (2010). 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  3. N. Gupta, A. Gupta, K.K. Saxena et al., Mechanical and durability properties of geopolymer concrete composite at varying superplasticizer dosage, Mater. today. Proc. 44 (2021) 12–16. [Google Scholar]
  4. I.S. Khan, M.O. Ahmad, J. Majava, Industry 4.0 and sustainable development: A systematic mapping of triple bottom line, Circular Economy and Sustainable Business Models perspectives, J. Clean. Prod. Elsevier. Ltd. 297 (2021) 126655. [Google Scholar]
  5. I.L. Poul Raj, S. Valanarasu, K. Hariprasad et al., Enhancement of optoelectronic parameters of Nd-doped ZnO nanowires for photodetector applications, OpT. Mater. (Amst). 109 (2020) 110396. [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Yadav, G. Beniwal, K.K. Saxena, A review on pore and porosity in tissue engineering, Mater. today. Proc. 44 (2021) 2623–2628. [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Kalpana, P.V. Kumar, S. Aljawarneh et al., Shifted Adaption Homomorphism Encryption for Mobile and Cloud Learning, CompuT. Electr. Eng. 65 (2018) 178–195. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Awasthi, K.K. Saxena, R.K. Dwivedi, An investigation on classification and characterization of bio materials and additive manufacturing techniques for bioimplants, Mater. today. Proc. 44 (2021) 2061–2068. [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Atchudan, T.N.J.I. Edison, M. Shanmugam et al., Sustainable synthesis of carbon quantum dots from banana peel waste using hydrothermal process for in vivo bioimaging, Phys. E. Lowdimensional. SysT. Nanostructures. 126 (2021) 114417. [Google Scholar]
  10. B.K. Kodli, R. Karre, K.K. Saxena et al., Flow behaviour of tiHy 600 alloy under hot deformation using gleeble 3800, Adv. Mater. Process. technol. 3 (2017) 490–510. [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Khanna, C. Agrawal, D.Y. Pimenov et al., Review on design and development of cryogenic machining setups for heat resistant alloys and composites, J. Manuf. Process. 68 (2021) 398–422. [Google Scholar]
  12. P.S.S. Kumar, K.V. Allamraju, A Review Of Natural Fiber Composites [Jute, Sisal, Kenaf], Mater. today. Proc. 18 (2019) 2556–2562. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Ramirez-Pena, P.F. Mayuet, J.M. Vazquez-Martinez et al., Sustainability in the aerospace, naval, and automotive supply chain 4.0: Descriptive review, Materials. (Basel). 13 (2020) 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  14. D.Y. Pimenov, M. Mia, M.K. Gupta et al., Improvement of machinability of ti and its alloys using cooling-lubrication techniques: A review and future prospect, J. Mater. Res. technol. 11 (2021) 719–753. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Dhawan, N. Gupta, R. Goyal et al., Evaluation of mechanical properties of concrete manufactured with fly ash, bagasse ash and banana fibre, Mater. today. Proc. 44 (2021) 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  16. V. Chandrappa, C. Basavapoornima, C.R. Kesavulu et al., Spectral studies of Dy3+: zinc phosphate glasses for white light source emission applications: A comparative study, J. Non. CrysT. Solids. [Internet]. 583 (2022) 121466. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. V. Arun, N.K. Shukla, A.K. Singh et al., Design and performance analysis of multiple all optical logic gates in a single photonic circuit, OpT. Quantum. Electron. 48 (2016) 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Awasthi, K.K. Saxena, V. Arun, Sustainable and smart metal forming manufacturing process, Mater. today. Proc. 44 (2021) 2069–2079. [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Yadav, P. Yamasani, S. Kumar, Experimental studies on a micro power generator using thermo-electric modules mounted on a micro-combustor, Energy. Convers Manag. 99 (2015) 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  20. A.K. Sharma, A.K. Tiwari, A.R. Dixit, Effects of Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) in machining processes using conventional and nanofluid based cutting fluids: A comprehensive review, J. Clean. Prod. 127 (2016) 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  21. H.A. Jaffery, M.F.M. Sabri, S.M. Said et al., Electrochemical corrosion behavior of Sn-0.7Cu solder alloy with the addition of bismuth and iron, J. Alloys. Compd. 810 (2019) 151925. [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Grover, A. Pandey, S.T. Kumari et al., Role of titanium in bio implants and additive manufacturing: An overview, Mater. today. Proc. 26 (2020) 3071–3080. [Google Scholar]
  23. A.M. Khan, N. He, L. Li et al., Analysis of Productivity and Machining Efficiency in Sustainable Machining of titanium Alloy, Procedia. Manuf. 43 (2020) 111–118. [Google Scholar]
  24. T.K. Gupta, P.R. Budarapu, S.R. Chappidi et al., Advances in Carbon Based Nanomaterials for Bio-Medical Applications, Curr. Med. Chem. 26 (2019) 6851–6877. [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Singh, A. Gupta, O. Tripathi et al., Powder bed fusion process in additive manufacturing: An overview, Mater. today. Proc. 26 (2020) 3058–3070. [Google Scholar]
  26. C.M. Lee, Y.H. Choi, J.H. Ha et al., Eco-friendly technology for recycling of cutting fluids and metal chips: A review, InT. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. - Green. technol. 4 (2017) 457–468. [Google Scholar]
  27. L. Yue, M. Jayapal, X. Cheng et al., Highly dispersed ultra-small nano Sn-SnSb nanoparticles anchored on N-doped graphene sheets as high performance anode for sodium ion batteries, Appl. Surf. Sci. 512 (2020) 145686. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. H. Tripathi, A. Bharti, K.K. Saxena et al., Improvement in mechanical properties of structural AZ91 magnesium alloy processed by friction stir processing, Adv. Mater. Process. technol. 8 (2021) 1543–1556. [Google Scholar]
  29. K. Li, F. Aghazadeh, S. Hatipkarasulu et al., Health risks from exposure to metal-working fluids in machining and grinding operations, InT. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 9 (2003) 75–95. [Google Scholar]
  30. H.S. Kang, J.Y. Lee, S. Choi et al., Smart manufacturing: Past research, present findings, and future directions, InT. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green. technol. 3 (2016) 111–128. [Google Scholar]
  31. C. Agrawal, J. Wadhwa, A. Pitroda et al., Comprehensive analysis of tool wear, tool life, surface roughness, costing and carbon emissions in turning ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy: Cryogenic versus wet machining, Tribol. InT. 153 (2021) 106597. [Google Scholar]
  32. G. Kshitij, N. Kangna, C.V. Yıldırım et al., Resource conservation and sustainable development in the metal cutting industry within the framework of the green economy concept: An overview and case study, Sustain. Mater. technol. 34 (2022) e00507. [Google Scholar]
  33. P. Shah, P. Bhat, N. Khanna, Life cycle assessment of drilling Inconel 718 using cryogenic cutting fluids while considering sustainability parameters, Sustain. Energy. technol. Assessments. 43 (2021) 100950. [Google Scholar]
  34. G. Singh, V. Aggarwal, S. Singh, Critical review on ecological, economical and technological aspects of minimum quantity lubrication towards sustainable machining, J. Clean. Prod. 271 (2020) 122185. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. J. Lenz, E. MacDonald, R. Harik et al., Optimizing smart manufacturing systems by extending the smart products paradigm to the beginning of life, J. Manuf. SysT. 57 (2020) 274–286. [Google Scholar]
  36. A. Sanders, C. Elangeswaran, J. Wulfsberg, Industry 4.0 implies lean manufacturing: Research activities in industry 4.0 function as enablers for lean manufacturing, J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 9 (2016) 811–833. [Google Scholar]
  37. S. Kargozar, S. Ramakrishna, M. Mozafari, Chemistry of biomaterials: future prospects, Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 10 (2019) 181–190. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.