EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 512 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 512 (2024) 03008 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 512, 2024
2024 International Conference on Urban Construction and Transportation (UCT 2024)
Article Number 03008
Number of page(s) 12
Section Traffic Construction Engineering and Transportation Optimization
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202451203008
Published online 10 April 2024
  1. Mock M. Making and breaking links: the transformative potential of shared mobility from a practice theories perspective[J/OL]. Mobilities, 2023, 18(3): 374–390. DOI:10.1080/17450101.2022.2142066. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Davis S J, Lewis N S, Shaner M, et al. Net-zero emissions energy systems[J/OL]. Science, 2018, 360(6396): eaas9793. DOI:10.1126/science.aas9793. [Google Scholar]
  3. Huang G, Xu D. The last mile matters: Impact of dockless bike-sharing services on traffic congestion[J/OL]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2023, 121: 103836. DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2023.103836. [Google Scholar]
  4. Nguyen-Phuoc D Q, Young W, Currie G, et al. Traffic congestion relief associated with public transport: state-of-the-art[J/OL]. Public Transport, 2020, 12(2): 455–481. DOI:10.1007/s12469-020-00231-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang G, Yang H, Li S, et al. What is the best catchment area of bike share station? A study based on Divvy system in Chicago, USA[C/OL]//2019 5th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS). Liverpool, United Kingdom: IEEE, 2019: 1226-1232[2023-10-16]. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8883774/. DOI:10.1109/ICTIS.2019.8883774. [Google Scholar]
  6. Horjus J S, Gkiotsalitis K, Nijënstein S, et al. Integration of shared transport at a public transport stop: mode choice intentions of different user segments at a mobility hub[J/OL]. Journal of Urban Mobility, 2022, 2: 100026. DOI:10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100026. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Campbell K B, Brakewood C. Sharing riders: How bikesharing impacts bus ridership in New York City[J/ OL]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017, 100: 264–282. DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.017. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bieliński T, Kwapisz A, Ważna A. Electric bikesharing services mode substitution for driving, public transit, and cycling[J/OL]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2021, 96: 102883. DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2021.102883. [Google Scholar]
  9. Qiu W, Chang H. The interplay between dockless bikeshare and bus for small-size cities in the US: A case study of Ithaca[J/OL]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2021, 96: 103175. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shaheen S A, Guzman S, Zhang H. Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: Past, Present, and Future[J/OL]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010, 2143(1): 159–167. DOI:10.3141/2143-20. [Google Scholar]
  11. Politis I, Fyrogenis I, Papadopoulos E, et al. Shifting to Shared Wheels: Factors Affecting Dockless Bike- Sharing Choice for Short and Long Trips[J/OL]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(19): 8205. DOI:10.3390/su12198205. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhao P, Li S. Bicycle-metro integration in a growing city: The determinants of cycling as a transfer mode in metro station areas in Beijing[J/OL]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017, 99: 46–60. DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2017.03.003. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang Y, Thomas T, Brussel M, et al. Exploring the impact of built environment factors on the use of public bikes at bike stations: Case study in Zhongshan, China[J/OL]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2017, 58: 59–70. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.11.014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. El-Assi W, Salah Mahmoud M, Nurul Habib K. Effects of built environment and weather on bike sharing demand: a station level analysis of commercial bike sharing in Toronto[J/OL]. Transportation, 2017, 44(3): 589–613. DOI:10.1007/s11116-015-9669-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Martin R, Xu Y. Is tech-enhanced bikeshare a substitute or complement for public transit?[J/OL]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2022, 155: 63–78. DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2021.11.007. [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu Y, Ji Y, Feng T, et al. Understanding the determinants of young commuters’ metro-bikeshare usage frequency using big data[J/OL]. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2020, 21: 121–130. DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2020.06.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shaheen S A, Zhang H, Martin E, et al. China’s Hangzhou Public Bicycle: Understanding Early Adoption and Behavioral Response to Bikesharing[J/OL]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011, 2247(1): 33–41. DOI:10.3141/2247-05. [Google Scholar]
  18. Krygsman S, Dijst M, Arentze T. Multimodal public transport: an analysis of travel time elements and the interconnectivity ratio[J/OL]. Transport Policy, 2004, 11(3): 265–275. DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.12.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ma X, Ji Y, Yang M, et al. Understanding bikeshare mode as a feeder to metro by isolating metrobikeshare transfers from smart card data[J/OL]. Transport Policy, 2018, 71: 57–69. DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.07.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Guo Y, Yang L, Chen Y. Bike Share Usage and the Built Environment: A Review[J/OL]. Frontiers in Public Health, 2022, 10: 848169. DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.848169. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.