Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 512, 2024
2024 International Conference on Urban Construction and Transportation (UCT 2024)
Article Number 04006
Number of page(s) 5
Section Modern Logistics Management and Transportation Economic Analysis
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202451204006
Published online 10 April 2024
  1. Ding Baocheng, Kong Lingfeng. Agricultural products supply chain performance evaluation under the background of agricultural and commercial interconnection. Manufacturing Automation, 2023,45(01):85-90. [Google Scholar]
  2. Virda Hersy Lutviana Saputri, Wahyudi Sutopo, Muhammad Hisjam, Azanizawati Ma’aram. STavana M,Shiraz R K,Hatami-Marbini A, et al. Chance-constrained DEA models with random fuzzy inputs and outputs[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2013, 52(nov.):32-52. [Google Scholar]
  3. ustainable Agri-Food Supply Chain Performance Measurement Model for GMO and Non-G MO Using Data Envelopment Analysis Method[J]. Applied Sciences,2019,9(6). [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhu Yihua, Wang Kai. Empirical study on the performance of agricultural product supply chain integration-taking Jiangsu as an example. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2004(02):42-48. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yu Ying. Agricultural products supply chain performance evaluation from the perspective of “three rural issues”. Development Research, 2011(03):93-96. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang Yong, Deng Xudong. Empirical study on performance evaluation of agricultural products supply chain based on factor analysis. China Circulation Economy, 2015,29(03):10-16. [Google Scholar]
  7. He Shan, Huang Jianhua. Performance evaluation of geographical indication agricultural products supply chain-typical analysis of Gannan navel orange based on the channel model of “farmers+cooperatives+supermarkets”. World Agriculture, 2017(10):134-139. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang Kaixuan, Yang Yuzhong. Grey clustering of green agricultural products supply chain performance evaluation-fuzzy comprehensive model and its application. Practice and understanding of mathematics, 2020,50(02):111-119. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheng Yu, Li Hong. Performance evaluation of agricultural products supply chain enterprises based on ROF model. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2021,49(01):202-208. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lin He, Zou Jiang. Analysis of factors affecting the operation performance of fresh agricultural products supply chain in Sichuan Province. Economist, 2022(01):152-154. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen Xiangqing, Zhao Lihua, Shen Chunfeng, et al. Study on the Construction of Performance Evaluation Index System of Agricultural Products Green Supply Chain in Hebei Province. Journal of Xingtai Vocational and Technical College, 2018,35(06):78-81. [Google Scholar]
  12. Li Dongbing, Yang Jie. Study on the coordinated development of Shanghai’s land and sea industrial system. Journal of Dalian Maritime University (Social Science Edition), 2016,15(01):6-11. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yan Bairui. Research on the third-party logistics enterprise competitiveness evaluation system. Logistics Science and Technology, 2017,40(07):55-57. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhou Defen. Research on real estate investment project evaluation model based on entropy TOPSIS method. International Business Accounting, 2020(03):77-81. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen Wei, Kang Xin, Feng Zhijun. Research on intellectual property operation efficiency of regional high-tech industries: An empirical analysis based on DEA and TOPSIS models. Science of Science and Management of Science and Technology,2011,32(11):125-130. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.