EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 517 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 517 (2024) 05011 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 517, 2024
The 10th International Conference on Engineering, Technology, and Industrial Application (ICETIA 2023)
Article Number 05011
Number of page(s) 6
Section Sustainable Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202451705011
Published online 15 April 2024
  1. L. Lin and L. Fei, “Real estate investment project risk analysis,” J. Chem. Pharm. Res., 6, no. 5, pp. 1789–1794, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. O. C. Nnamani, “Application of risk management techniques in property development projects in Nigeria: a review Risk and Uncertainty,” no. 2012, pp. 1–15, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  3. R. J. Buttimer, S. P. Clark, and S. H. Ott, “Land development: Risk, return and risk management,” J. Real Estate Finance. Econ., 36, no. 1, pp. 81–102, 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11146-007-9077-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. S. T. Namitha Sheen, R. Shanmuga Priyan, and S. Sugumar, “A Review on Risk Management in Residential Projects,” Int. J. Eng. Res., 6, no. 11, 2017, doi: 10.17577/ijertv6is110150. [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Priyanto, M. N. Sahid, M. Solikin, and J. Al Faruqi, “Investigation of Critical Risk Factors and Level of Risk for Environmentally damage induced by house projects,” Casp. J. Environ. Sci., 20, no. 2, pp. 413–421, 2022, doi: 10.22124/CJES.2022.5589. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. A. Prakash, D. K. N. Manikanta, and S. M. Prabhu, “Risk assessment of residential buildings in the Indian construction industry by application of fuzzy,” Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol., 8, no. 4, pp. 884–894, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Bonander and H. Ulriksson, “Risk Management in Residential Construction,” 2016. [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Mallik, “Factors and Impact of Risk Management Practice on Success of Construction Projects of Housing Developers, Kathmandu, Nepal,” Int. J. Sci. Basic Appl. Res., 36, no. 7, pp. 206–232, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Costello and F. Preller, “Property development principles and process -an industry analysis,” Pacific Rim Prop. Res. J., 16, no. 2, pp. 171–189, 2010, doi: 10.1080/14445921.2010.11104300. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Fergany, M. Badawy, and O. El-nawawy, “Risk assessment Model for Residential Construction Projects Risk assessment Model for Residential Construction Projects,” no. September, pp. 328–337, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Khandekar, P. N. Futane, and P. S. S. Sabihuddin, “Study of Factors Influencing Residential Real Estate Development Process,” 7, no. 7, pp. 13303–13307, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Szymański, “Risk management in construction projects,” Procedia Eng., 208, pp. 174–182, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.036. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Cheraghi, M. Khalilzadeh, S. Shojaei, and S. Zohrehvandi, “A Mathematical Model to Select the Risk Response Strategies of the Construction Projects: Case Study of Saba Tower,” Procedia Comput. Sci., 121, pp. 609–616, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.080. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. W. Wang, Y. Wu, and M. Sloan, “A framework & dynamic model for reform of residential land supply policy in urban China,” Habitat Int., 82, no. January, pp. 28–37, 2018, doi 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.10.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. F. Wajdi, A. A. Setyawan, Syamsudin, and M. Isa, “Manajemen Risiko Bisnis Umkm Di Kota Surakarta,” BENEFIT J. Manaj. dan Bisnis, 16, no. 2, pp. 116–126, 2012, [Online]. Available: http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/benefit/article/view/1359/915. [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Qazi, J. Quigley, A. Dickson, and K. Kirytopoulos, “Project Complexity and Risk Management (ProCRiM): Towards modeling, project complexity is driven risk paths in construction projects,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., 34, no. 7, pp. 1183–1198, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. R. R. Rumimper, B. F. Sompie, and M. D. J. Sumajouw, “Analisis Resiko Pada Proyek Konstruksi Perumahan di Kabupaten Minahasa Utara,” J. Ilm. Media Eng., 5, no. 2, pp. 381– 389, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  18. B. Partamihardja, “Persepsi Risiko Pengembang Perumahan Di Kabupaten Banyumas,” J. Tek. Sipil dan Perenc., 16, no. 2, pp. 105–116, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Mubarak, S. Murtiadi, and H. Sulistiyono, “Analisis resiko developer dalam perumahan di kota Mataram,” pp. 19–25, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Iqbal, R. M. Choudhry, K. Holschemacher, A. Ali, and J. Tamošaitienė, “Risk management in construction projects,” Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., 21, no. 1, pp. 65–78, 2015, doi: 10.3846/20294913.2014.994582. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Bon-Gang, “Risk Assessment and Mitigation Measures for Green Construction Projects,” Perform. Improv. Green Constr. Proj., pp. 211– 233, 2018, doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-8154830.00013-2. [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Shan, B. Gang Hwang, and K. S. N. Wong, “A preliminary investigation of underground residential buildings: Advantages, disadvantages, and critical risks,” Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol., 70, no. July, pp. 19–29, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2017.07.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Soomro, M. Memon, A. Chandio, S. Sohu, and R. Soomro, “Causes of Time Overrun in Construction of Building Projects in Pakistan,” Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., 9, no. 1, pp. pp. 3762–3764, 2019, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.2576277. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. B. G. Hwang, M. Shan, H. Phua, and S. Chi, “An exploratory analysis of risks in green residential building construction projects: The case of Singapore,” Sustain., 9, no. 7, pp. 9–11, 2017, doi: 10.3390/su9071116. [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Isa, M. Farid Wajdi, A. A. Setyawan Pusat Studi Penelitian dan Pengembangan Manajemen dan Bisnis UMS, and J. A. Yani Pabelan Kartasura Surakarta, “Strategi Penguatan Kapasitas Stakeholder Dalam Adaptasi Dan Mitigasi Banjir Di Kota Surakarta,” J. Manaj. dan Bisnis, 17, no. 2, pp. 99–110, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  26. New Partners Initiative Technical Assistance, “Developing a Risk Management Plan,” 2010. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.