EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 517 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 517 (2024) 14004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 517, 2024
The 10th International Conference on Engineering, Technology, and Industrial Application (ICETIA 2023)
Article Number 14004
Number of page(s) 7
Section Circular Industrial Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202451714004
Published online 15 April 2024
  1. A. Putri, “Jurnal Geografi Potensi Wilayah Beberapa Daerah Di Indonesia,” J. Geogr., vol. XX, no. November, pp. 0–20, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Agusti, T. Wisudawati, F. T. Risqi, and K. Kumaratunggadewi, “Evaluasi Teknologi Produksi pada Sentra Industri Keripik Tempe Grobog Wonogiri,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 30–35, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  3. N. Andarwulan, L. Nuraida, D. R. Adawiyah, R. N. Triana, D. Agustin, and D. Gitapratiwi, “Pengaruh Perbedaan Jenis Kedelai terhadap Kualitas Mutu Tahu,” J. Mutu Pangan, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 66–72, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. N. N. Agtriani and B. Prabawani, “Analisis Proses Produksi Pada Usaha Kecil Dan Menengah (Ukm) Tahu Di Kelurahan Jomblang Berbasis Eko-Efisiensi (Studi Pada Ukm Tahu Harapan Tenang Semarang),” J. Ilmu Adm. Bisnis, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 106–118, 2020, doi: 10.14710/jiab.2020.27224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Riyanto and Y. Pramesti, “Pemanfaatan Limbah Plastik dengan Teknologi Daur Ulang pada Hot Rolled Asphalt Ditinjau dari Aspek Properties Marshall, Nilai Ketidakrataan, dan Durabilitas,” Din. Tek. Sipil Maj. Ilm. Tek. Sipil, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 2022, doi: 10.23917/dts.v1i1.18088. [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Hartini, B. S. Ramadan, R. Purwaningsih, S. Sumiyati, and M. A. A. Kesuma, “Environmental impact assessment of tofu production process: Case study in SME Sugihmanik, Grobogan,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 894, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/894/1/012004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. I. P. Sari, W. Kuniawan, and F. L. Sia, “Environmental impact of tofu production in West Jakarta using a life cycle assessment approach,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 896, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/896/1/012050. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. D. Kayode-Afolayan, E. F. Ahuekwe, and O. C. Nwinyi, “Impacts of pharmaceutical effluents on aquatic ecosystems,” Sci. African, vol. 17, p. e01288, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01288. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Zielińska-Chmielewska, A. Olszańska, J. Kaźmierczyk, and E. V. Andrianova, “Advantages and constraints of eco-efficiency measures: The case of the polish food industry,” Agronomy, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2021, doi: 10.3390/agronomy11020299. [Google Scholar]
  10. E. U. Lolo, R. I. Gunawan, A. Y. Krismani, and Y. S. Pambudi, “Penilaian Dampak Lingkungan Industri Tahu Menggunakan Life Cycle Assessment (Studi Kasus: Pabrik Tahu Sari Murni Kampung Krajan, Surakarta),” J. Serambi Eng., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 2337–2347, 2021, doi: 10.32672/jse.v6i4.3480. [Google Scholar]
  11. X. Zhang and D. Xu, “Assessing the eco- efficiency of complex forestry enterprises using LCA/time-series DEA methodology,” Ecol. Indic., vol. 142, no. April, p. 109166, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109166. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Purwaningsih, C. F. Simanjuntak, and Z. F. Rosyada, “Eco-Efficiency of Pencil Preduction Using Life Cycle Assessment to Increase the Manufacture Sustainability,” J. Tek. Ind., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 47–54, 2021, doi: 10.9744/jti.22.1.47-52. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Faishal, M. N. Arfan, and H. M. Asih, “Reducing Environmental Impact on SME Metals Production Process Using Life Cycle Assessment and Analytical Hierarchy Process Method,” J. Ilm. Tek. Ind., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 84–94, 2020, doi: 10.23917/jiti.v19i1.10041. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yuniaristanto, W. Sutopo, A. Widiyanto, and A. S. Putri, “Concept of economic readiness levels assessment,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 1902, 2017, doi: 10.1063/1.5010640. [Google Scholar]
  15. N. Susanto and T. T. Putranto, “Pengukuran Tingkat Eko-Efisiensi Batik Cap Menggunakan Metode Life Cycle Analysis (Studi Kasus: Batik Encim pada Kampoeng Batik Kauman Pekalongan),” J. Ilmu Lingkung., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 654–664, 2022, doi: 10.14710/jil.20.3.654-664. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Muslimah, S. Soeparman, B. Yanuwiyadi, and H. Riniwati, “Using eco-efficiency to analyze environmental impact of the batik industry,” Technol. Reports Kansai Univ., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1809–1814, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  17. W. Sutopo, M. Nizam, A. Purwanto, N. Atikah, and A. S. Putri, “A cost estimation application for determining feasibility assessment of Li-Ion battery in mini plant scale,” Int. J. Electr. Eng. Informatics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 189–199, 2016, doi: 10.15676/ijeei.2016.8.1.13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.