EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 532 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 532 (2024) 01008 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 532, 2024
Second International Conference of Applied Industrial Engineering: Intelligent Production Automation and its Sustainable Development (CIIA 2024)
Article Number 01008
Number of page(s) 17
Section Integrating Sustainability Strategies and Developments in Industrial Production
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202453201008
Published online 06 June 2024
  1. E. Urteaga, Las teorías económicas del desarrollo sostenible, Cuadernos de Economía 32, 113 (2009). 10.1016/S0210-0266(09)70051-2 [Google Scholar]
  2. M.R. Perello-Marin, R. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J.J. Alfaro-Saiz, Analysing GRI reports for the disclosure of SDG contribution in European car manufacturers, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 181, 121744 (2022). 10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2022.121744 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Brundtland, Tech. rep., Naciones Unidas (1987) [Google Scholar]
  4. M.d.M. Alonso-Almeida, F. Marimon, J. Llach, Difusión de las memorias de sostenibilidad en Latinoamérica: análisis territorial y sectorial, Estudios Gerenciales pp. 139–149 (2015). 10.1016/j.estger.2015.01.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Polanco, F. Ramírez, M. Orozco, Incidencia de estándares internacionales en la sostenibilidad corporativa: una perspectiva de la alta dirección, Estudios Gerenciales 32, 181 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2016.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Gutiérrez-Ponce, Sustainability as a strategy base in Spanish firms: Sustainability reports and performance on the sustainable development goals, Sustainable Development 31, 3008 (2023). 10.1002/SD.2566 [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Carro-Suárez, S. Sarmiento-Paredes, G. Rosano-Ortega, La cultura organizacional y su influencia en la sustentabilidad empresarial. La importancia de la cultura en la sustentabilidad empresarial, Estudios Gerenciales 33, 352 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2017.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  8. Y. Höller, M.M. Urbschat, A. Bathke, Sustainable scientific publishing: a pilot survey on stakeholder motivations and opinions, Discover Sustainability 5, 1 (2024). 10.1007/s43621-023-00175-1 [Google Scholar]
  9. A.M.A. AL-Janabi, M.J. Saei, R. Hesarzadeh, The Impact of Adherence to Sustainable Development, as Defined by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI-G4), on the Financial Performance Indicators of Banks: A Comparative Study of the UAE and Iraq, Journal of Risk and Financial Management 17, 17 (2024). 10.3390/jrfm17010017 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Lozano, D. Huisingh, Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting, Journal of Cleaner Production 19, 99 (2011). 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.004 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Kuzey, A. Uyar, Determinants of sustainability reporting and its impact on firm value: Evidence from the emerging market of Turkey, Journal of Cleaner Production 143, 27 (2017). 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.12.153 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Mio, Corporate social reporting in Italian multi-utility companies: An empirical analysis, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17, 247 (2010). 10.1002/CSR.213 [Google Scholar]
  13. J.A. Martínez-Regalado, C.L. Murillo-Avalos, P. Vicente-Galindo, M. Jiménez-Hernández, J.L. Vicente-Villardón, Using HJ-Biplot and External Logistic Biplot as Machine Learning Methods for Corporate Social Responsibility Practices for Sustainable Development, Mathematics 2021, Vol. 9, Page 2572 9, 2572 (2021). 10.3390/MATH9202572 [Google Scholar]
  14. L.R. Ferrada, M. Vega, J.A. Orozco-Toro, C. Ávila, The sdgs in sustainability reports among companies in ecuador, colombia, and chile, Contratexto pp. 117–147 (2023). 10.26439/contratexto2023.n40.6440 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Polibio Martínez, J. Jara-Alvear, R.J. Andrade, D. Icaza, Sustainable development indicators for electric power generation companies in Ecuador: A case study, Utilities Policy 81, 101493 (2023). 10.1016/j.jup.2023.101493 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Mira, V. Pérez-Jover, S. Lorenzo, J. Aranaz, J. Vitaller, La investigación cualitativa: una alternativa también válida, Atención Primaria 34, 161 (2004). 10.1016/S02126567(04)78902-7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. N. Mays, C. Pope, Rigour and qualitative research, British Medical Journal 311, 109 (1995). 10.1136/BMJ.311.6997.109 [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Blázquez, M.F. Peretti, Modelo para gestionar la sustentabilidad de las organizaciones a través de la rentabilidad, adaptabilidad e imagen, Estudios Gerenciales 28, 40 (2012). 10.1016/S0123-5923(12)70006-2 [Google Scholar]
  19. Global Reporting Initiative, Tech. rep., Amsterdam (2006) [Google Scholar]
  20. O. González-Morales, I. Galván-Sánchez, C. Román-Cervantes, Social responsibility as a source of satisfaction for worker-members in a social economy transport company, Research in Transportation Business & Management 51, 101070 (2023). 10.1016/J.RTBM.2023.101070 [Google Scholar]
  21. S.A. Dominguez Lara, ¿Ítems Politómicos o Dicotómicos? Un estudio empírico con una escala unidimensional, Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento (RACC) 5, 30 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  22. K.R. Gabriel, The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis, Biometrika 58, 453 (1971). 10.1093/biomet/58.3.453 [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Nieto, Ph.D. thesis, UNIVERSIDAD DE SALAMANCA, Salamanca, Spain (2013) [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Galindo, Un alternativa de representación simultánea: HJ-Biplot., Qüestiió 10, 13 (1986). [Google Scholar]
  25. J.L. Vicente Villardón, Ph.D. thesis, University of Salamanca, Spain (1992) [Google Scholar]
  26. J.R. Demey, J.L. Vicente-Villardón, M.P. Galindo-Villardón, A.Y. Zambrano, Identifying molecular markers associated with classification of genotypes by External Logistic Biplots, Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 24, 2832 (2008). 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTN552 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. S.Y. Enciso-Alfaro, V. Amor-Esteban, T.C. Azevedo, I.M. García-Sánchez, Multivariate Analysis of Clean Technologies in Agricultural and Livestock Companies in Castilla y León, Agriculture (Switzerland) 13, 2087 (2023). 10.3390/agriculture13112087 [Google Scholar]
  28. I. Gallego-Álvarez, J.L. Vicente-Villardón, Analysis of environmental indicators in international companies by applying the logistic biplot, Ecological Indicators 23, 250 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.024 [Google Scholar]
  29. J.L. Vicente Villardon, Introducción | MultiBiplot | José Luis Vicente Villardón (2009), http://biplot.usal.es/multbiplot/introduction.html [Google Scholar]
  30. Z.E. Chay, C.H. Lee, K.C. Lee, J.S. Oon, M.H. Ling, Russel and Rao Coefficient is a Suitable Substitute for Dice Coefficient in Studying Restriction Mapped Genetic Distances of Escherichia coli (2023). [Google Scholar]
  31. T. Wang, F. Zhang, H. Gu, H. Hu, M. Kaur, A research study on new energy brand users based on principal component analysis (PCA) and fusion target planning model for sustainable environment of smart cities, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 57, 103262 (2023). 10.1016/J.SETA.2023.103262 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.