EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 533 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 533 (2024) 04028 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 533, 2024
XXVII International Scientific Conference on Advance in Civil Engineering “Construction the Formation of Living Environment” (FORM-2024)
Article Number 04028
Number of page(s) 7
Section Sustainable Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202453304028
Published online 07 June 2024
  1. M. Santamouris, A. Tsangrassoulis, and N. Klitsikas, “Energy and Environmental Quality in the Urban Built Environment,” in World Renewable Energy Congress VI, Elsevier, 2000, pp. 69–74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Gann and J. Whyte, “Design quality, its measurement and management in the built environment,” Building Research & Information, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 314–317, Jan. 2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. M. Cysek-Pawlak and S. Krzysztofik, “The New Urbanism Principle of Quality Architecture and Urban Design Versus Place Identity. A Case Study of Val D’Europe and the Manufaktura Complex,” European Spatial Research and Policy, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 99–115, Dec. 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. E. V. Alzemeneva and Yu.V. Mamaeva, “IDENTITY OF THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT,” Engineering and Construction Bulletin of the Caspian Region, vol. 112, pp. 40–47, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Tweed and M. Sutherland, “Built cultural heritage and sustainable urban development,” Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 62–69, Nov. 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Oktay, “The quest for urban identity in the changing context of the city,” Cities, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 261–271, Aug. 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Y. Ovsiannikova and M. N. Nikolaenko, “Quality assessment of urban environment,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 71, p. 012051, Jan. 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Southworth, “Measuring the Liveable City,” Built Environment, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 343–354, Dec. 2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Caner and F. Bolen, “Implications for socio-spatial segregation in urban theories,” Journal of Planning, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 153–161, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. R. Cuthbert, “A debate from down-under: spatial political economy and urban design,” URBAN DESIGN International, vol. 10, no. 3-4, pp. 223–234, Sep. 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Florian Wiedmann and A. Salama, “The role of architecture in producing urban qualities for sustainability: Implications for the future of architectural education,” 2012. [Google Scholar]
  12. C. McFarlane, “Urban Shadows: Materiality, the ‘Southern City’ and Urban Theory,” Geography Compass, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 340–358, Mar. 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. M. Salama, “Prospects for research in architecture and urbanism,” Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 2–7, Mar. 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Robinson, “Thinking cities through elsewhere,” Progress in Human Geography, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 3–29, Aug. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  15. J. W. R. Whitehand, “The Basis for an Historico-Geographical Theory of Urban Form,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 400, 1977. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Azimzadeh, “Evolving Urban Culture in Transforming Cities Architectural and Urban Design in a Fluid Context,” 2003. [Google Scholar]
  17. O. Zhelezniak and M. Korelina, “Image-Design Discourses of Identity as Unique Resources of the Quality of Environment and Means of Increasing Investment Attractiveness of the City,” Matec Web of Conferences, 2018, DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201821208007. [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Han, K. Yang, C. Yang, G. Ye, and L. Xu, “Influence and Mechanism of a Multi-Scale Built Environment on the Leisure Activities of the Elderly: Evidence From Hefei City in China,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159237. [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Goussous and M. Haddadin, “Conserving Amman’s Identity Within the Global Effect on Local Architecture,” 2019, DOI: 10.33422/5th-ste.2019.08.444. [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Jaśkiewicz and T. Besta, “Polish Version of the Neighbourhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS-Poland),” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2016, DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13111090. [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Amar and A. Budianta, “The Study of City Identity and Its Correlation With Environment Al Quality Improvement,” 2016, DOI: 10.21063/ictis.2016.1081. [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Jaśkiewicz and T. Besta, “Is Easy Access Related to Better Life? Walkability and Overlapping of Personal and Communal Identity as Predictors of Quality of Life,” Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2013, DOI: 10.1007/s11482-013-9246-6. [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Ovsiannikova and M. Nikolaenko, “Sustainable Urban Built Environment: Modern Management Concepts and Evaluation Methods,” 2017, DOI: 10.1063/1.4973062. [Google Scholar]
  24. Muhammad Akmal Hakim bin Hishammuddin, G. H. T. Ling, L. W. Chau, and C. S. Ho, “Application of Comprehensive Assessment System for Built Environment Efficiency (CASBEE) at City Level in Johor Bahru,” 2019, DOI: 10.20944/preprints201901.0328.v1. [Google Scholar]
  25. B. Sun and C. Yin, “Impacts of a Multi-Scale Built Environment and Its Corresponding Moderating Effects on Commute Duration in China,” Urban Studies, 2019, DOI: 10.1177/0042098019871145. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.