EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 540 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 540 (2024) 03014 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 540, 2024
1st International Conference on Power and Energy Systems (ICPES 2023)
Article Number 03014
Number of page(s) 10
Section Wind Turbine and Energy Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454003014
Published online 21 June 2024
  1. Moore, A.; Price, J.; Zeyringer, M. The role of floating offshore wind in a renewable focused electricity system for Great Britain in 2050. Energy Strategy Rev. 2018, 22, 270–278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Freire, R.L.A.; Junior, S.d. Technical and economic assessment of power hubs for offshore oil and gas application. In Proceedings of the ECOS 2019—Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact Energy Systems, Wroclaw, Poland, 23–28 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brazil. Law #6938, from 31 August 1981. 1981. Available online: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l6938.htm (accessed on 6 April 2020). [Google Scholar]
  4. J.R. Carpenter, L. Merckelbach, U. Callies, S. Clark, L. Gaslikova, B. Baschek, Potential impacts of offshore wind farms on North Sea stratification, PloS One, 11 (2016), pp. 1–28, 10.1371/journal.pone.0160830 [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Copping, N. Sather, L. Hanna, J. Whiting, G. Zydlewsk, G. Staines, A. Gill, I. Hutchison, A.M. O’Hagan, T. Simas, J. Bald, C. Sparling, J. Wood, E. Masden, Annex IV 2016 state of the science report: environmental effects of marine renewable energy development around the world, OES-Environmental (2016), pp. 1–224 [Google Scholar]
  6. J.T. Claisse, D.J. Pondella, M. Love, L.A. Zahn, C.M. Williams, J.P. Williams, A.S. Bull, Oil platforms off California are among the most productive marine fish habitats globally, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am., 111 (43) (2014), pp. 15462–15467, 10.1073/pnas.1411477111 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. M.J. Brandt, A. Diederichs, K. Betke, G. Nehls, Responses of harbour porpoises to pile driving at the Horns Rev II offshore wind farm in the Danish North Sea, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 421 (2011), pp. 205–216, 10.3354/meps08888 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Adams, E.C. Kelsey, J.J. Felis, D.M. Pereksta, Collision and displacement vulnerability among marine birds of the California current system Associated with offshore wind energy infrastructure, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2016-, 1154 (2016), p. 116, 10.3133/ofr20161154 [Google Scholar]
  9. A.C. Bejarano, J. Michel, J. Rowe, Z. Li, D. French McCay, L. McStay, D.S. Etkin, Environmental Risks, Fate and Effects of Chemicals Associated with Wind Turbines on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf, US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Office of Renewable Energy Programs, Herndon, VA (2013), OCS Study BOEM 2013–213 [Google Scholar]
  10. G.W. Boehlert, A.B. Gill, Environmental and ecological effects of ocean renewable energy development: a current synthesis, Oceanography, 23 (2) (2010), pp. 68–81 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. McMurry, G.R. 2008. Wave energy ecological effects workshop: Ecological assessment briefing paper. Pp. 25–66 in Ecological Effects of Wave Energy Development in the Pacific Northwest: A Scientific Workshop. October 11–12, 2007 [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Copping, N. Sather, L. Hanna, J. Whiting, G. Zydlewsk, G. Staines, A. Gill, I. Hutchison, A.M. O’Hagan, T. Simas, J. Bald, C. Sparling, J. Wood, E. Masden, Annex IV 2016 state of the science report: environmental effects of marine renewable energy development around the world, OES-Environmental (2016), pp. 1–224 [Google Scholar]
  13. Draget, E. Environmental Impacts of Offshore Wind Power Production in the North Sea; WWF: Oslo, Norway, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  14. Farr, H.; Ruttenberg, B.; Walter, R.K.; Wang, Y.-H.; White, C. Potential environmental effects of deepwater floating offshore wind. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2021, 207, 105611. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smallwood, K.S. Estimating Wind Turbine–Caused Bird Mortality. J. Wildl. Manag. 2007, 71, 2781–2791. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hüppop, O.; Dierschke, J.; Exo, K.; Fredrich, E.; Hill, R. Bird migration and offshore wind turbines. In Offshore Wind Energy: Research on Environmental Impact; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2006; pp. 91–116. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sovernigo, M.H. Impacto dos AerogeradoresSobrea Avifauna e Quiropterofauna no Brasil. 2019. Available online: https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/132383 (accessed on 6 April 2020). [Google Scholar]
  18. Sovernigo, M.H. Impacto dos AerogeradoresSobrea Avifauna e Quiropterofauna no Brasil. 2019. Available online: https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/132383 (accessed on 6 April 2020). [Google Scholar]
  19. Dhurandher, S. K., Sharma, D. K., & Woungang, I. (2013). Energy-based Performance Evaluation of Various Routing Protocols in Infrastructure-less Opportunistic Networks. Journal of Internet Services and Information Security, 3(1/2), 37–48. [Google Scholar]
  20. Thooyamani K.P., et.al Energy efficient reprogramming for mobile sensor network, World Applied Sciences Journal, V-29, I-14, PP:228–233, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  21. Nagarajan, A., & Jensen, C. D. (2010). A Generic Role Based Access Control Model for Wind Power Systems. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications, 1(4), 35–49. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.