EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 544 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 544 (2024) 04002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 544, 2024
8th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Porto 2023)
Article Number 04002
Number of page(s) 8
Section Experimental Investigations From Very Small Strains to Beyond Failure - Data Interpretation and Geotechnical Imaging
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454404002
Published online 02 July 2024
  1. Benz, T. 2007. “Small-Strain Stiffness of Soils and Its Numerical Consequences.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Stuttgart. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brinkgreve, R.B.J. 2019. “Automated Model and Parameter Selection: Incorporating Expert Input into Geotechnical Analyses.” Geostrata 23 (1): 38–45. doi:10.1061/geosek.0000115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. D’Ignazio, M., T. Lunne, K. H. Andersen, S. Yang, B. Di Buo, and T. Lansivaara. 2019. “Estimation of Preconsolidation Stress of Clays from Piezocone by Means of High-Quality Calibration Data.” AIMS Geosciences 5 (2): 104–16. doi:10.3934/geosci.2019.2.104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doherty, J. P., S. Gourvenec, F. M. Gaone, J. A. Pineda, R. Kelly, C. D. O’Loughlin, M. J. Cassidy, and S. W. Sloan. 2018. “A Novel Web Based Application for Storing, Managing and Sharing Geotechnical Data, Illustrated Using the National Soft Soil Field Testing Facility in Ballina, Australia.” Computers and Geotechnics 93:3–8. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.05.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gundersen, A. S., R. C. Hansen, T. Lunne, J. S. L’Heureux, and S. O. Strandvik. 2019. “Characterization and Engineering Properties of the NGTS Onsoy Soft Clay Site.” AIMS Geosciences 5 (3): 665–703. doi:10.3934/geosci.2019.3.665. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hegazy, Y. A., and P. Mayne. 1995. “Statistical Correlations Between Vs and CPT Data for Different Soil Types.”. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hegazy, Y. A., and P. Mayne. 2006. “A Global Statistical Correlation Between Shear Wave Velocity and Cone Penetration Data.” 243–48. doi:10.1061/40861(193)31. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jaky, J. 1944. “The Coefficient of Earth Pressure at Rest.” J. of the Society of Hungarian Architects and Engineers, 355–58. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1571698599493336320. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kulhawy, F. H., and P. Mayne. 1990. “Manual on Estimating Soil Properties for Foundation Design.”. L’Heureux, J. S., and T. Lunne. 2020. “Characterization and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils Used for Geotesting.” AIMS Geosciences 6 (1): 35–53. doi:10.3934/geosci.2020004. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lengkeek, H. J., J. de Greef, and S. Joosten. 2018. “CPT Based Unit Weight Estimation Extended to Soft Organic Soils and Peat.” In Cone Penetration Testing IV: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing (CPT 2018), June 21–22, 2018, Delft, the Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lunne, T., T. Berre, and S. Strandvik. 1997. “Sample Disturbance Effects in Soft Low Plastic Norwegian Clay.” Symposium on Recent Developments in Soil and Pavement Mechanics, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. https://trid.trb.org/view/476476. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lunne, T., P. K. Robertson, and J. J. M. Powell. 1997. Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice. First edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Marzouk, I., F. Tschuchnigg, F. Paduli, H. J. Lengkeek, and R.B.J. Brinkgreve. “Determination of Fine-Grained Soil Parameters Using an Automated System.” In Cone Penetration Testing 2022, 540–45. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mayne, P. 2007. “In-Situ Test Calibrations for Evaluating Soil Parameters.” In Characterisation and engineering properties of natural soils. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mayne, P. 2014. “Interpretation of Geotechnical Parameters from Seismic Piezocone Tests.”. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mayne, P. 2016. “Evaluating Effective Stress Parameters and Undrained Shear Strengths of Soft-Firm Clays from CPTu and DMT.” Fifth International Conference on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization (ISC’5). [Google Scholar]
  17. Mayne, P. 2017. “Stress History of Soils from Cone Penetration Tests.” Soils and Rocks (3). [Google Scholar]
  18. Mayne, P., M. Coop, S. Springman, A. B. Huang, and J. Zornberg. 2009. “State-of-the-Art Paper (SOA-1): Geomaterial Behavior and Testing.”. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mayne, P., and G. J. Rix. 1993. “Gmax-Qc Relationships for Clays.” Geotech. Test. J. 16 (1): 54. doi:10.1520/GTJ10267J. [Google Scholar]
  20. Norwegian Geotechnical Institute. 2019. “Norwegian GeoTest Sites—Field and Laboratory Test Results from NGTS Soft Clay Site—Onsoy: Report No. 20160154–10-R. Rev. 2.”. [Google Scholar]
  21. Robertson, P. K. 2009. “Interpretation of Cone Penetration Tests — A Unified Approach.” Can. Geotech. J. 46 (11): 1337–55. doi:10.1139/T09-065. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Robertson, P. K. 2010. “Soil Behaviour Type from the CPT: An Update.” 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Huntington Beach 2, 575–83. [Google Scholar]
  23. Robertson, P. K. 2015. “Guide to Cone Penetration Testing for Geotechnical Engineering.” Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing (CPT14, Las Vegas). [Google Scholar]
  24. Robertson, P. K. 2016. “Cone Penetration Test (CPT)-Based Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) Classification System — An Update.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (12): 1910–27. doi:10.1139/cgj-2016-0044. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Robertson, P. K., and K. L. Cabal. 2010. “Estimating Soil Unit Weight from CPT.” https://www.cptrobertson.com/PublicationsPDF/Unit%20Weight%20Rob%20%26%20Cabal%20CPT10.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  26. Schroeder, K., K. H. Andersen, and K. M. Tjok. 2006. “Laboratory Testing and Detailed Geotechnical Design of the Mad Dog Anchors.”: OnePetro. [Google Scholar]
  27. van Berkom, I.E, R.B.J. Brinkgreve, H. J. Lengkeek, and A. K. de Jong. 2022. “An Automated System to Determine Constitutive Model Parameters from in Situ Tests.” Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Sydney 2021. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.