EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 544 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 544 (2024) 05005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 544, 2024
8th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Porto 2023)
Article Number 05005
Number of page(s) 7
Section Experimental Investigations From Very Small Strains to Beyond Failure - Multiscale Problems in Geomechanics (Micro-to-Macro Strains)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454405005
Published online 02 July 2024
  1. Been, K., Jefferies, M. G. “A state parameter for sands”, Géotechnique, 35(2), pp. 99–112, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.2.99 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coop, M. R. “The mechanics of uncemented carbonate sands”, Géotechnique, 40(4), pp. 607–626, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1990.40.4.607 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Giretti, D., Fioravante, V., Been, K., Dickenson, S. “Mechanical properties of a carbonate sand from a dredged hydraulic fill”, Géotechnique, 68(5), pp. 410–420, 2018. http://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Guo, Y., Yang, J. “Use of shear wave velocity to evaluate insitu state of silty sands”, In: Proc. of the 19th Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Geot. Eng.: Unearth the Future (eds.) Lee, W., Lee, J.-S., Kim, H.-K., Kim, D.-S., Seoul, Korea, 2017, pp. 603–606. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gutierrez, G. A. “Influence of late cementation on the behaviour of reservoir sands”, PhD Thesis. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jefferies, M. “Nor-Sand: a simple critical state model for sand”, Geotechnique, 43(1), pp. 91103, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.1.91 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jefferies, M.G., and Been, K. “Soil Liquefaction. A critical State Approach”, 2nd ed., CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1201/b19114 [Google Scholar]
  8. Jefferies, M. “On the fundamental nature of the state parameter”, Géotechnique, published online: November 12, 2021, Available at: [https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.20.P.228], accessed: 18/10/2022). [Google Scholar]
  9. Jia, J., Zhang, J., Sun, X. “The critical state parameter of sands from their image-based intrinsic properties”, Acta Geotech, 16(12), pp. 4081–4092, 2021.http://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01280-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miura, N., Yamanouchi, T. “Effect of water on the behavior of a quartz-rich sand under high stresses”, Soils Found, 15(4), pp. 2334, 1975. Available at: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/soils-andfoundations/vol/15/issue/4], accessed: 18/10/2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pestana, J. M., Whittle, A. J., Salvati, L. A. “Evaluation of a constitutive model for clays and sands. Part I-Sand behaviour”, Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech, 26(11), pp. 10971121, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.237 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Porcino, D. D., Diano, V., Triantafyllidis, T., Wichtmann, T. “Predicting undrained static response of sand with nonplastic fines in terms of equivalent granular state parameter”, Acta Geotech, 15(4), pp. 867–882, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00770-5 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Prearo, C. “Determination of cyclic resistance of clean sands from cone penetration test based on state parameter”, PhD thesis, University of Ferrara, 2015. Available at: [https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/41182659.pdf], accessed: 24/08/2021) [Google Scholar]
  14. Robertson, P.K. “Estimating in-situ state parameter and friction angle in sandy soils from CPT”, In2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Huntington Beach, CA,USA, May 2010. Available at: [https://www.cptrobertson.com/PublicationsPDF/Robertson%202010%20Insitu%20State%20CPT10%20cor.pdf], accessed: 18/10/2022). [Google Scholar]
  15. Silva, J. P. d. S., Cacciari, P. P., Torres, V. F. N., Ribeiro, L. F. M., Assis, A. d.P. “Behavioural analysis of iron ore tailings though critical state soil mechanics”, Soils and Rocks, 45(2), 2022 http://doi.org/10.28927/SR.2022.071921 [Google Scholar]
  16. Sun, D. A., Huang, W. X., Sheng, D. C., Yamamoto, H. “An Elastoplastic Model for Granular Materials Exhibiting Particle Crushing”, Key Engineering Materials, 340–341, pp. 1273–1278, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.340-341.1273 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Szypcio, Z. “Stress-dilatancy for soils. Part I: The frictional state theory”, Stud Geotech Mech, 38(4), pp. 51–57, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1515/sgem-2016-0030 [Google Scholar]
  18. Szypcio, Z. “Stress-dilatancy behaviour of calcareous sands”, In: Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, Porto, Portugal, 2023, pp. xxxxxx. https://doi.org/[DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Taborda, D. M. G., Pedro, A. M. G., Pirrone, A. I. “A state parameter-dependent constitutive model for sands based on the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion”, Comput Geotech, 148, 104811, pp. 1–16, 2022. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104811 [Google Scholar]
  20. Taiebat, M., Dafalias, Y. F. “SANISAND: Simple anisotropic sand plasticity model”, Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech, 32(8), pp. 915–948, 2008. http://doi.org/10.1002/nag.651 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yao, Y. P., Sun, D. A., Luo, T. “A critical state model for sands dependent on stress and density”, Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech, 28(4), pp. 323–337, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.340 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yao, Y.-P., Yamamoto, H., Wang, N.-D. “Constitutive model considering sand crushing”, Soils Found, 48(4), pp. 603–608, 2008. http://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.48.603 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhao, L., Wang, D. “A modified state parameter for sands”,Acta Geotech, 17(8), pp. 3397–3405, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01434-z [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.