Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 544, 2024
8th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Porto 2023)
Article Number 07008
Number of page(s) 8
Section Behaviour, Characterization and Modelling of Various Geomaterials and Interfaces - Physical and Numerical Modelling
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454407008
Published online 02 July 2024
  1. Adams, M., Nicks, J., Stabile, T., Wu, J., Schelatter, W. and Hartmann, J. (2012). “Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Integrated Bridge System Interim Implementation Guide.” Publication No. FHWA-HRT-11-026, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) (2017). “Plans of Proposed Project No. BRZ-4814 (251): Marshall County Bridge Replacement and Approaches on Cochran Road at Turkey Creek with GRS-IBS. Montgomery, Alabama. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bentley (2021a). “Plaxis 3D: Material Models Manual.” Plaxis connect edition v21.01. Last updated: March 04, 2021. https://communities.bentley.com/cfsfile/__key/communityserver-wikis-components-files/00-00-00-05-58/PLAXIS3DCE_2D00_V21.01_2D00_03_2D00_Material_2D00_Models.pdf [Google Scholar]
  4. Bentley (2021b). “Plaxis 3D: Reference Manual.” Plaxis connect edition v21.01. Last updated: March 04, 2021. https://communities.bentley.com/cfsfile/__key/communityserver-wikis-components-files/00-00-00-05-58/PLAXIS3DCE_2D00_V21.01_2D00_02_2D00_Reference.pdf [Google Scholar]
  5. Hatami, K., and Bathurst, R.J. (2005). “Development and Verification of a Numerical Model for the Analysis of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Segmental Walls under Working Stress Conditions.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 42(4), doi:10.1139/T05-040 [Google Scholar]
  6. Hogan, R. J. (2018). “Monitoring and Evaluation of Alabama’s First Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil-Integrated Bridge System.” Master of Civil Engineering Project, Auburn University, Auburn AL. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hogan, R. J., Pirando, R., Anderson, J. B. and Montgomery, J. (2019). “Monitoring and Evaluation of Alabama’s First Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil-Integrated Bridge System.” Geo-Congress 2019 GSP 306.https://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/9780784482087.020 [Google Scholar]
  8. Micha Van der Sloot (2018). “Plaxis Soiltest” Calibration Software. https://soilmodels.com/soiltest/#:~:text=The%20SoilTest%20option%20is%20a,a%20complete%20finite%20element%20model [Google Scholar]
  9. NAVFAC, 1982. “Foundations and Earth Structures.” Design Manual 7.02 86. Department of the Navy Facilities [Google Scholar]
  10. Engineering Command, Alexandria, Virginia 22332–2300. https://web.mst.edu/~rogersda/umrcourses/ge441/DM7_02.pdf [Google Scholar]
  11. Okafor, C., C., Anderson, J., B., Montgomery, J., Stallings, J., and Hogan., J., R. (2023). “3D modelling of the effects of backfill-retained rock frictional interface on the performance of GRS-IBS.” Manuscript under preparation. [Google Scholar]
  12. Stallings, J. (2020). “Implementation of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil – Integrated Bridge System (GRS-IBS) Technology in Alabama.” M.Sc. thesis, Auburn University, Auburn AL. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wood, D. M. (2014). Geotechnical Modelling. CRC Press, Florence. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wu, J., T., H., and Adams, M., T. (2007). “Myth and Fact on Long-Term Creep of GRS Structures,” Geotechnical Special Publication No. 165, Geosynthetics in Reinforcement and Hydraulic Applications, Proceedings, Geo-Denver 2007, American Society of Civil Engineers, Denver, CO. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.