EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 544 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 544 (2024) 07012 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 544, 2024
8th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Porto 2023)
Article Number 07012
Number of page(s) 8
Section Behaviour, Characterization and Modelling of Various Geomaterials and Interfaces - Physical and Numerical Modelling
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454407012
Published online 02 July 2024
  1. Burke, Jr., P., Martin. “Integral and semi-integral bridges”. John Wiley & Sons, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brennan, A. J., N. I., Thusyanthan, and S. P., Madabhushi.. “Evaluation of shear modulus and damping in dynamic centrifuge tests.” Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering 131, no. 12, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)10900241(2005)131:12(1488). [Google Scholar]
  3. Erhan, S., and M. Dicleli”Effect of dynamic soil–bridge interaction modeling assumptions on the calculated seismic response of integral bridges.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 66,. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.06.033 [Google Scholar]
  4. Haigh, S. K., J., Eadington, and S. P. G., Madabhushi. 2012. “Permeability and stiffness of sands at very low effective stresses.” Géotechnique 62, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.10.P.035. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hardin, B. O., and V. P., Drnevich. “Shear modulus and damping in soils: design equations and curves.” Journal of the Soil mechanics and Foundations Division 98, no. 7, 1972a. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001760. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hardin, B. O., and V. P., Drnevich.. “Shear modulus and damping in soils: measurement and parameter effects (terzaghi leture).” Journal of the soil mechanics and foundations division 98, no. 6, 1972b. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001756. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ghosh, B., and S. P. G., Madabhushi. “An efficient tool for measuring shear wave velocity in the centrifuge.” In Physical modelling in geotechnics, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203743362. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kunin, J., and S., Alampalli “Integral abutment bridges: Current practice in United States and Canada.” Journal of performance of constructed facilities 14, no. 3, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2000)14:3(104). [Google Scholar]
  9. Madabhushi, G. “Centrifuge modelling for civil engineers “. CRC press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315272863. [Google Scholar]
  10. Madabhushi, S. P. G., N. E., Houghton, and S. K., Haigh. “A new automatic sand pourer for model preparation at University of Cambridge.” In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on physical modelling in geotechnics, pp. 217–222. Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  11. Madabhushi, G. S., S. K., Haigh, N. E., Houghton, and E., Gould. “Development of a servo-hydraulic earthquake actuator for the Cambridge Turner beam centrifuge. “International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics 12, no. 2, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.11.00013. [Google Scholar]
  12. Madabhushi, S. S., and S. K., Haigh.. “On the dynamic response of flexible dual-row retaining walls in dry sand.” Géotechnique 72, no. 11, 2022 https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.19.P.189. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mitoulis, S. A. “Challenges and opportunities for the application of integral abutment bridges in earthquakeprone areas: A review.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 135, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106183. [Google Scholar]
  14. Schofield, A. N. “Cambridge geotechnical centrifuge operations.” Geotechnique 30, no. 3, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1980.30.3.227. [Google Scholar]
  15. Shepley, P. “Water injection to assist pile jacking.” PhD diss., University of Cambridge. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  16. Steedman, R. S., and S. P. G., Madabhushi. “Wave propagation in sand medium”. University of Cambridge, Department of Engineering, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  17. Stewart, D. P., Y. R., Chen, and B. L., Kutter. “Experience with the use of methylcellulose as a viscous pore fluid in centrifuge models.” Geotechnical Testing Journal 21, no. 4, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11376J. [Google Scholar]
  18. Stringer, M. E., and S. P. G., Madabhushi. “Novel computercontrolled saturation of dynamic centrifuge models using high viscosity fluids.” Geotechnical Testing Journal 32, no. 6, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11376J. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tubaldi, E., S. A., Mitoulis, and H. Ahmadi. “Comparison of different models for high damping rubber bearings in seismically isolated bridges.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 104, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.09.017. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zeghal, M., A. W., Elgamal, H. T., Tang, and J. C., Stepp. “Lotung downhole array. II: Evaluation of soil nonlinear properties.” Journal of geotechnical engineering 121, no. 4, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:4(363). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.