Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 544, 2024
8th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Porto 2023)
Article Number 10004
Number of page(s) 6
Section Behaviour, Characterization and Modelling of Various Geomaterials and Interfaces - Cyclic and Dynamic Behaviour
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454410004
Published online 02 July 2024
  1. Chang, W. J., Phantachang, T. “Effects of gravel content on shear resistance of gravelly soils”, Eng. Geol., 207, pp. 78–90, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Haeri, S. M., Shahcheraghi, S. A., Sadeghi, H. “A new method for eliminating membrane compliance in cyclic triaxial tests on gravelly soils”, Sci. Iran., 26(6A), pp. 3181–3195, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hardin, B. O., Drnevich, V. P. “Shear modulus and damping in soils: measurement and parameter effects”, J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 98(SM6). pp. 603–624, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hardin, B. O., Richart, F.E. “Elastic wave velocities in granular soils”, J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 81(1), pp. 33–65, 1963. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hubler, J. F. “Laboratory and in-situ assessment of liquefaction of gravelly soils”. PhD Thesis, The University of Michigan, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ishihara, K. “Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes”, Geotechnique, 43(3), pp. 351–451, 1993. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Iwasaki, T., Tatsuoka, F. “Effects of grain size and grading on dynamic shear moduli of sands”, Soils Found., 17(3), pp. 19–35, 1977. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kokusho, T. “Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range”, 3(2), pp. 305–312, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kokusho, T., Yoshida, Y. “SPT N-value and S-wave velocity for gravelly soils with different grain size distribution”, Soils Found., 37(4), pp. 105–13, 1997. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kokusho, T., Yoshida, Y., Tanaka, Y. “Static and dynamic properties of gravelly soils with different particle gradings”, In: ASCE National Convention, Geotech. Spec. Publ., pp. 91–106, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lade, P. V., Liggio, C. D., Yamamuro, J. A. “Effects of nonplastic fines on minimum and maximum void ratios of sand”, Geotech. Test. J., 21(4), pp. 336–347, 1998 [Google Scholar]
  12. Rahman, M. M., Cubrinovski, M., Lo, S. R. “Initial shear modulus of sandy soils and equivalent granular void ratio”, Geomech. Geoeng., 7(3), pp. 219–226, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rahman, M. M., Lo, S. R., Gnanendran, C. T. “Reply to the discussion by Wanatowski and Chu on “on equivalent granular void ratio and steady state behaviour of loose sand with fines”“, Can. Geotech. J., 46(4), pp. 483–486, 2009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Thevanayagam, S., Shenthan, T., Mohan, S. Liang, J. “Undrained fragility of clean sands, silty sands, and sandy silts”, J. Geotech. Geoenv. Eng., 128(10), pp. 849–859, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Thevanayagam, S. “Intergrain contact density indices for granular mixes - I: framework”, Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib., 6(2), pp. 123–134, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  16. Thevanayagam, S., Liang, J.. “Shear wave velocity relations for silty and gravely soils”, In: 4th Int.Conf. Recent Adv. Geotech. Earthquake Eng. Soil Dyn., pp. 1–6, Buffalo, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  17. Toyota, H., Takada, S. “Effects of gravel content on liquefaction resistance and its assessment considering deformation characteristics in gravel – mixed sand”, Can. Geotech. J., 56(12), pp. 1743–1755, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wichtmann, T., Navarrete Hernandez, M. A., Triantafyllidis, T. “On the influence of a non-cohesive fines content on small strain stiffness, modulus degradation and damping of quartz sand”, Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 69, pp. 103–114, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zuo, L., Baudet, B. A. “Determination of the transitional fines content of sand-non plastic fines mixtures”, Soils Found., 55(1), pp. 213–219, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.