EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 544 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 544 (2024) 10005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 544, 2024
8th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Porto 2023)
Article Number 10005
Number of page(s) 7
Section Behaviour, Characterization and Modelling of Various Geomaterials and Interfaces - Cyclic and Dynamic Behaviour
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454410005
Published online 02 July 2024
  1. Cardile, G., M. Pisano, and N. Moraci. “The influence of a cyclic loading history on soil-geogrid interaction under pullout condition”, Geotext Geomembr, 47(4), pp. 552–565, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.01.012 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. CEN “EN 13286–2 :2010. Unbound and hydraulically bound mixtures - Part 2: Test methods for laboratory reference density and water content - Proctor compaction”, CEN, Brussels, Belgium, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. CEN “EN ISO 10319 :2015. Geosynthetics - Wide-width tensile test”, CEN, Brussels, Belgium, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ferreira, F. B., C. S. Vieira, and M. L. Lopes. “Direct shear behaviour of residual soil–geosynthetic interfaces - influence of soil moisture content, soil density and geosynthetic type”, Geosynth Int, 22(3), pp. 257–272, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.15.00011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferreira, F. B., C. S. Vieira, and M. L. Lopes. “Pullout behavior of different geosynthetics - Influence of soil density and moisture content”, Front Built Environ, 6(12), pp. 1–13, 2020a, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00012 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferreira, F. B., C. S. Vieira, M. L. Lopes, and D. M. Carlos. “Experimental investigation on the pullout behaviour of geosynthetics embedded in a granite residual soil”, Eur J Environ Civ Eng, 20(9), pp. 1147–1180, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2015.1090927 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferreira, F. B., C. S. Vieira, M. L. Lopes, and P. G. Ferreira. “HDPE geogrid-residual soil interaction under monotonic and cyclic pullout loading”, Geosynth Int, 27(1), pp. 79–96, 2020b, https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.19.00057 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ferreira, F. B., C. S. Vieira, P. M. Pereira, and M. L. Lopes. “Recycled construction and demolition waste as backfill material for geosynthetic-reinforced structures”, In: Sustainable Civil Engineering: Principles and Applications, 1st ed., CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 2023, pp. 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lopes, M. L., and M. Ladeira. “Role of specimen geometry, soil height and sleeve length on the pull-out behaviour of geogrids”, Geosynth Int, 3(6), pp. 701–719, 1996a, https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.3.0081 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lopes, M. L., and M. Ladeira. “Influence of the confinement, soil density and displacement rate on soil-geogrid interaction”, Geotext Geomembr, 14(10), pp. 543–554, 1996b, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(97)83184-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Min, Y., D. Leshchinsky, H. Ling, and V. Kaliakin. “Effects of sustained and repeated tensile loads on geogrid embedded in sand”, Geotech Test J, 18(2), pp. 204–225, 1995, https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10322J [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moraci, N., and G. Cardile. “Influence of cyclic tensile loading on pullout resistance of geogrids embedded in a compacted granular soil”, Geotext Geomembr, 27(6), pp. 475–487, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.09.019 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Moraci, N., and G. Cardile. “Deformative behaviour of different geogrids embedded in a granular soil under monotonic and cyclic pullout loads”, Geotext Geomembr, 32, pp. 104–110, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.11.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Raju, D. M., and R. J. Fannin. “Load-strain-displacement response of geosynthetics in monotonic and cyclic pullout”, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 35(2), pp. 183–193, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1139/t97-088 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Razzazan, S., A. Keshavarz, and M. Mosallanezhad. “Pullout behavior of polymeric strip in compacted dry granular soil under cyclic tensile load conditions”, J Rock Mech Geotech Eng, 10(5), pp. 968–976, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.04.007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Viana da Fonseca, A., M. Matos Fernandes, and A. Silva Cardoso. “Interpretation of a footing load test on a saprolitic soil from granite”, Géotechnique, 47(3), pp. 633–651, 1997, https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1997.47.3.633 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vieira, C. S., F. B. Ferreira, P. M. Pereira, and M. L. Lopes. “Pullout behaviour of geosynthetics in a recycled construction and demolition material - effects of cyclic loading”, Transp Geotech, 23, 100346, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100346 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vieira, C. S., P. M. Pereira, F. B. Ferreira, and M. L. Lopes. “Pullout behaviour of geogrids embedded in a recycled construction and demolition material. Effects of specimen size and displacement rate”, Sustainability, 12(9), 3825, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093825 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Watanabe, K., K. Kojima, and A. Kudo. “Influence of cyclic load on pullout stiffness of geogrid embedded in wellgraded gravel”, Geosynth Int, 29(4), pp. 442–456, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.21.00045 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.