EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 544 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 544 (2024) 17001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 544, 2024
8th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Porto 2023)
Article Number 17001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Practical Prediction and Interpretation of Ground Response: Field Observation and Case Histories - Integrated Site Characterization
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454417001
Published online 02 July 2024
  1. Baecher, G. B., Christian, J. T. “Introduction-Uncertainty and Risk in Geotechnical Engineering.” In: Reliability and Statistics in Geotechnical Engineering, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex, England, 2005, pp. 3–16. [Google Scholar]
  2. British Standards Institution (BSI) “ BS 1377-5: Methods of test for Soils for civil engineering purposes- Part 5: Compressibility, permeability and durability tests.” BSI, London, United Kingdom, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ching, J, Phoon, K.-K. “Value of Geotechnical Site Investigation in Reliability-Based Design.”, Adv. Struct. Eng., 15 (11), pp. 1935–1945, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.15.11.1935 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ching, J, Phoon, K.-K. “Modelling parameters of structured clays as a multivariate normal distribution.”, Can. Geotech. J. 49, pp. 522–545, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1139/t2012-015 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Evans, J. “Straightforward statistics for the behavioural sciences.”, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 91 (436), pp. 1750–1751, 1996. https://doi-org.proxy.findit.cvt.dk/10.2307/2291607 [Google Scholar]
  6. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) “ ISO/TS 17892-9: Geotechnical investigation and testing- Laboratory testing of soil — Part 9: Consolidated triaxial compression tests on water saturated soils.” ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kulhawy, F. H., Mayne, P. W. “Manual on Estimating Soil properties for Foundation Design.”, Electric Power Research Institute EL-6800, Project 1493–6, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif., 1990. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ladd, C. C, Foott, R., Ishihara, K., Schlosser, F. and Poulos, H. G. “Stress-deformation and strength characteristics, state of the art report. “ In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, 1977, 2, pp. 421–494. [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu, S., Zou, H., Cai, G., Bheemasetti, T. V., Puppala, A. J., Lin, J. “Multivariate correlation among resilient modulus and cone penetration tests parameters of cohesive subgrade soils.”, Eng. Geol., 209, pp. 128–142, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.05.018 [Google Scholar]
  10. Luo, Z., Di, H., Kamalzare, M. and Li, Y. “Effects of soil spatial variability on structural reliability assessment in excavations.”, Undergr. Space., 5 (1), pp. 71–83, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2018.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  11. Nelsen, R. B. “ Methods of Constructing Copulas.”, In An Introduction to Copulas, edited by P. Buhlmann, P. Diggle, U. Gather and S. Zeger, Springer Science +, New York, USA, 2006, pp. 51–105. [Google Scholar]
  12. Phoon, K. K., Ching, J. “Constructing multivariate distributions for soil parameters.”, In Risk and Reliability in Geotechnical Engineeringi edited by K. K. Phoon and J. Ching, Taylor & Francis Group, Sound Parkway NW, 2015, pp. 3–72. https://doiorg.proxy.findit.cvt.dk/10.1201/b17970 [Google Scholar]
  13. Phoon, K. K., Kulhawy, F. H. “ Characterization of geotechnical variability.”, Can. Geotech. J., 36, pp. 612–624, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-038 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schanz, T., Vermeer, P. A., Bonnier, P. G. The Hardening Soil Model: Formulation and Verification. Presented at Beyond 2000 in Computational Geotechnics-10 years of PLAXIS, Balkema, Rotterdam, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315138206 [Google Scholar]
  15. Sorensen, K. K., Okkels, N. “ Correlation between drained shear strength and plasticity index of undisturbed overconsolidated clays.”, In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris, France, 2013, pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  16. Stark, T. D., Choi, H., McCone, S. “ Drained shear strength parameters for analysis of landslides.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 131 (5), pp. 575–588, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)10900241(2005)131:5(575) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Straub, D. “Value of information analysis with structural reliability methods.”, Struct. Saf., 49, pp. 75–85, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.08.006 [Google Scholar]
  18. Li, H. S., Lu, Z. Z., Yuan, X. K. “Nataf transformation-based point estimate method.”, Chin. Sci. Bull., 53 (17), pp. 2586–2592, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0351-0 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tang, X.-S., Li, D.-Q., Rong, G., Phoon, K.-K., Zhou, C.-B. “Impact of copula selection on geotechnical reliability under incomplete probability information.”, Comput. Geotech.,49,pp. 264–278, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  20. Tavenas, F., Jean, P., LeBlond, P. and Leroeil, S. “The permeability of natural soft clays. Part II, Permeability Characteristics.”, Can. Geotech. J., 20 (4), pp. 645–660, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1139/t83-073 [Google Scholar]
  21. Terzaghi, K., Peck, R. B, Mesri, G. “Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice.”, 3rd edn. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wu, X. Z. “Probabilistic slope stability analysis by a copulabased sampling method.” Comput. Geosci.,17 (5), pp. 739–755, 2013. 10.1007/s10596-013-9353-3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, D., Zhou, Y., Phoon, K. K., Huang, H. “Multivariate probability distribution of Shanghai clay properties.”, Eng. Geol.,273, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105675 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.