Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 544, 2024
8th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Porto 2023)
Article Number 18001
Number of page(s) 6
Section Practical Prediction and Interpretation of Ground Response: Field Observation and Case Histories - Performance Evaluation of Geotechnical Structures
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454418001
Published online 02 July 2024
  1. ANA – National Water Agency 2017. Dam safety report 2016. ANA, Brasilia, 225 p. [Google Scholar]
  2. ANM – National Mining Agency, 2022. Resolution no 95, of February 7th, 2022: Consolidates the normative acts that deal with the safety of mining dams. ANM, Brasilia, 49 p. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowles, D.S., Anderson, L.R., Glover, T.F., Chauhan, S.S. 1999. Understanding and managing the risk of aging dams: principals and case studies. In: 19th USCOLD Annual Meeting and Lecture, Atlanta, USA. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowles, D.S. 2000. Advances in the practice and use of portfolio risk assessment. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Australian Committee on Large Dams – ANCOLD, pp. 1–12, Queensland, Australia. [Google Scholar]
  5. Curt, C., Talon, A., Mauris, G. 2011. A dam assessment support system based on physical measurements, sensory evaluations and expert judgements. Measurement, 44 (1): 192–201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Duncan J.M. 2000. Factors of Safety and Reliability in Geotechnical Engineering. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, v. 126, n. 4, p. 307-316. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fell, R., Bowles, D.S., Anderson L.R., Bel, G. 2000. The status of methods for estimation of the probability of failure of dams for use in quantitative risk assessment. In: Proceedings of 20th International Congress on Large Dams, Beijing, China [Google Scholar]
  8. Hartford, D.N.D., and Baecher, G.B. 2004. Risk and uncertainty in dam safety. Thomas Telford Ltd, London. 391 p. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. ICOLD – International Commission on Large Dams 2009. Dam safety management. In: Proceedings of 23rd International Congress on Large Dams, Brasilia, Brazil. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jeon, J., Lee, J., Shin, D., Park, H. 2009. Development of dam safety management system. Advances in Engineering Software, 40 (1): 554–563. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kulhawy, F. H. 1992. On Evaluation of Static Soil Properties. In Stability and Performance of Slope and Embankments II, ASCE, New York, p. 95-115. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lumb, P. 1974. Application of Statistics in Soil Mechanics. Soil Mechanics: New Horizons, Elsevier, New York, pp.44-111. [Google Scholar]
  13. Morgenstern, N.R. 2018. Geotechnical Risk, Regulation, and Public Policy. Soils and Rocks, 41(2): 107–129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schultz, M.T., Gouldby B.P., Simm,J.D., Wibowo, J.L. 2010. Beyond the factor of safety: Developing fragility curves to characterize system reliability. Techical Report: ERDC SR 10–1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, L., Peng, M., Chang D., Xu Y. 2016. Dam failure mechanisms and risk assessment. John Wiley & Sons, Singapore, 476 p. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.