EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 544 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 544 (2024) 17003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 544, 2024
8th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Porto 2023)
Article Number 17003
Number of page(s) 7
Section Practical Prediction and Interpretation of Ground Response: Field Observation and Case Histories - Integrated Site Characterization
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454417003
Published online 02 July 2024
  1. Baldi, G., R. Bellotti, V. N. Ghionna, M. Jamiolkowski, and D. F. C. Lo Presti, “Modulus of sands from CPTs and DMTs”, Proc. 12th In. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Vol. 1, pp. 165- 170, 1989 [Google Scholar]
  2. Blaker O., R. Carrol, P. Panigua, and D. J. DeGroot, “Halden: Geotechnical Characterisation of a post glacial silt”, AIMS Geosc. 5(2), Oslo, Norway, pp. 184–234, 2019 [Google Scholar]
  3. Burns, S. E. and P. W. Mayne, “Analytical cavity expansioncritical state model CPTU dissipation in fine-grained soils”. Soils & Foundations, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 131–137, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Di Buo B., M. D’Ignazio, J. Selanpaa, M. Haikola, T. Lansivaara and M. Di Sante, “Investigation and geotechnical characterisation of Pernio clay, Finland”. AIMS Geosc. 5(3), Oslo, Norway, pp. 591–616, 2019 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hegazy, Y.A. and P. W. Mayne, “Statistical correlations between Vs and CPT data for different soil types”, Proc. of Symposium on CPT, Vol. 2, Linkoping, Sweden, pp. 173–178, 1995 [Google Scholar]
  6. Kulhawy, F.H., and P. W. Mayne, “Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design”. Electric Power Research Institute, New York, USA, Rep. EL-6800, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  7. L’Heurex J.S., A. Lindgard and A. Emdal, “Tiller-Flotten: Geotechnical characterisation of a very sensitive clay deposit”. AIMS Geosc. 5(4), Oslo, Norway 2019, pp. 831–867. [Google Scholar]
  8. Marchetti, S., “In Situ Tests by Flat Dilatometer”. J. of the Geotech. Engineering Division. ASCE, Vol. 106, Np. GT3, Proc. Paper 15290, pp-299-321, 1980 [Google Scholar]
  9. Mayne, P.W., “In-Situ Test Calibrations for Evaluating Soil Parameters”, Proc. Symp. on Characterization & Engineering Properties of Natural Soils II, Vol.3, Singapore, pp.2-56, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  10. Mayne, P.W., “Cone Penetration Testing State of Practice”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, USA, Rep. NCHRP Project 20–05, Topic 37-14, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mayne, P.W. and G. J. Rix, “Correlations between shear wave velocity and cone tip resistance in clays”. Soils & Foundations, Vol. 35, No. 2., pp. 107–110, 1995 [Google Scholar]
  12. Mⱡynarek Z., J. Wierzbicki and T. Lunne, “On the influence of overconsolidation effect on the compressibility assessment of subsoil by means of CPTU and DMT”. Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Land Reclamation No.48 (3), Warsaw, Poland, pp.189-200, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  13. Powell, J.J.M., L. Dhimitri, D. Ward and A. P. Butcher, “Small strain stiffness assessments from in situ tests – revisited”. Proc. of 5th Intl. Conf on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization, Gold Coast, Australia, pp. 1253–1258, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  14. Powell, J.J.M., “In situ testing – Ensuring Quality in Equipment, Operation and Interpretation”. 8th James K. Mitchell Honour Lecture, XIX Intl. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Seoul, South Korea, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  15. Powell, J.J.M. and L. Dhimitri, “Watch out for the use of global correlations and “black box” interpretation of CPTU data”, Proc. of 5th Intl. Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Bologna, Italy, pp. 651–657, 2022 [Google Scholar]
  16. Robertson, P.K., “Interpretation of CPTU, a unified approach”. Can. Geotech. J. 46(11), pp. 1337–1355 2009.. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sanglerat, G., “The penetrometer and soil exploration: interpretation of penetration diagrams theory and practice”, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tonni L. and G. Gottardi, “Analysis and interpretation of piezocone data on the silty soils of the Venetian Lagoon (Treporti test site)”. Can. Geotech. J. 48, pp. 616–633, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tonni L. and G. Gottardi, “Assessing compressibility characteristics of silty soils lessons learnt from Treporti Test Site”. AIMS Geosc. 5(2), Oslo, Norway, pp. 117–144, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tschuschke W., M. K. Kumor, M. Walczak and M. Tschuschke, “Cone penetration test in assessment of soil stiffness”. Geological Quarterly, 59 (2), pp.419-425, 2015. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.