EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 546 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 546 (2024) 01011 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 546, 2024
2024 2nd International Conference on Green Building (ICoGB 2024)
Article Number 01011
Number of page(s) 6
Section Green Building Design and Environmental Sustainability
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454601011
Published online 09 July 2024
  1. IEA, IRENA, UN Climate Change High-Level Champions, Breakthrough Agenda Report 2023 (IEA, 2023) [Google Scholar]
  2. European Commission, The European Green Deal (European Commission, Brussels, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  3. European Union, Directive (EU) 2018/844 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings and Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency (2018) [Google Scholar]
  4. European Union, Directive (EU) 2023/1791 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 September 2023 on energy efficiency and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  5. United Nations, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (United Nations, 1987) [Google Scholar]
  6. C. J. Kibert, Establishing principles and a model for sustainable construction, in the First International Conference of CIB TG 16 on Sustainable Construction, Tampa, Florida, USA, November 6-9 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  7. R. C. Hill, P. A. Bowen, Sustainable construction: principles and a framework for attainment. Constr. Manag. Econ. 15, 3, 223–239 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/014461997372971 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Salmi, J. Jussila, M. Hämäläinen, The role of municipalities in transformation towards more sustainable construction: the case of wood construction in Finland. Constr. Manag. Econ. 40, 11-12, 934–954 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2022.2037145 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. P. S. P. Wong, B. Whelan, S. Holdsworth, Are contractors ready for greater use of prefabrication in projects? An empirical analysis on the role of unlearning and counter-knowledge. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 21, 4, 353–368 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1539160 [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Gounder, A. Hasan, A. Shrestha, A. Elmualim, Barriers to the use of sustainable materials in Australian building projects. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 30, 1, 189–209 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2020-0854 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Giorgi, M. Lavagna, K. Wang, M. Osmani, G. Liu, A. Campioli, Drivers and barriers towards circular economy in the building sector: Stakeholder interviews and analysis of five European countries policies and practices. J. Clean Prod. 336, 130395 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130395 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Viholainen, E. Kylkilahti, M. Autio, J. Pöyhönen, A. Toppinen, Bringing ecosystem thinking to sustainability-driven wooden construction business. J. Clean Prod. 292, 126029 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126029 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Wiegand, M. Ramage, The impact of policy instruments on the first generation of Tall Wood Buildings. Build. Res. Inf. 50, 3, 255–275 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2021.1905501 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. G. Newell, M. J. Marzuki, The increasing importance of environmental sustainability in global real estate investment markets. J. Prop. Invest. Finance. 40, 4, 411–429 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-01-2022-0005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Jackson, A. Orr, The embeddedness of sustainability in real estate investment decisionmaking. J. Eur. Real Estate Res. 14, 3, 362–380 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/JERER-09-2020-0050 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. P. X. W. Zou, M. Alam, Closing the building energy performance gap through component level analysis and stakeholder collaborations. Energ. Buildings. 224, 110276 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110276 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Elnaklah, I. Walker, S. Natarajan, Moving to a green building: Indoor environment quality, thermal comfort and health. Build. Environ. 191, 107592 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107592 [Google Scholar]
  18. Q. Li, L. Zhang, L. Zhang, X. Wu, Optimizing energy efficiency and thermal comfort in building green retrofit. Energy. 237, 121509, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121509 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Chegut, P. Eichholtz, N. Kok, The price of innovation: An analysis of the marginal cost of green buildings. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 98, 102248 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.07.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. B. Dalton, F. Fuerst, The ‘green value’ proposition in real estate: A meta-analysis, in Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Real Estate (Routledge, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  21. N. Leskinen, J. Vimpari, S. Junnila, A Review of the Impact of Green Building Certification on the Cash Flows and Values of Commercial Properties. Sustainability. 12, 7, 2729 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072729 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. K. Addae-Dapaah, J. Wilkinson, Green Premium: What is the Implied Prognosis for Sustainability? J. Sustain. Real Estate. 12, 1, 16–33 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/19498276.2021.1915663 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.