EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 552 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 552 (2024) 01047 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 552, 2024
16th International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterization (ICMPC 2024)
Article Number 01047
Number of page(s) 16
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202455201047
Published online 23 July 2024
  1. Gyasi, S. F., Kuranchie, F. A., & Ntibrey, R. A. (2020). Antimicrobial and coagulation potential of Moringa oleifera seed powder coupled with sand filtration for treatment of bath wastewater from public senior high schools in Ghana. Heliyon(6), 1-10. [Google Scholar]
  2. Queensland Government, Australia,. (June 2003.). Natural Resources and Mines. Guidelines for the use and disposal of greywater in unsewered areas. [Google Scholar]
  3. Abo-El-Enein, S., Mohamd, F., Eissa, M., Diafullah, A., & Rizk, M. (2011). Utilization of a low cost agro-residue for production of coagulant aids and their applications. Journal of Hazardous Materials(172), 574-657. [Google Scholar]
  4. Adamu, C., Nganje, T., & Edet, A. (2015). Heavy metal contamination and health risk assessment associated with abandoned barite mines in Cross River State, southeastern Nigeria. (307), 10-21. [Google Scholar]
  5. Akyuz, S., Akyuz, T., & Davies, J. (1993). A vibrational spectro- scopic study of the adsorption of 4,4V-bipyridyl by sepiolite and smectite group clay minerals from Anatolia (Turkey). Journal of Inclusion Phenomena and Molecular Recognition in Chemistry, 15, 105-119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Al-Gheethi, A., Mohamed, R., Ahmed, A., Nurulainee, N., Mas Rahayu, J., & Amir Hashim, M. (2017). Efficiency of Moringa oleifera seeds for treatment of laundry wastewater. MATEC Web Conf., 103, 6001. [Google Scholar]
  7. ALI, I. (2010). The quest for active carbon adsorbent substitutes: inexpensive adsorbents for toxic metal ions removal from wastewater. Separation & Purification Reviews, 39, 95-171,. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Amiri, M., Bahrami, M., Badkouby, M., & Kalavrouziotis, I. (2019). .Greywater treatment using single and combined adsorbents for landscape irrigation. Environmental Processes, 1(6), 43-63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Aoudj, S., Khelifa, A., Drouiche, N., & Hecini, M. (2013). wastewater remediation by electrocoagulation process, Desalin. Water Treatment, 51, 1596-1602. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Arumugam N, Chelliapan S, Kamyab H, Thirugnana S, Othman N, Nasri NS (2018). Treatment of Wastewater Using Seaweed: A Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 13;15(12):2851. doi: https://10.3390/ijerph15122851. PMID: 30551682; PMCID: PMC6313474. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Badruddoza, A., Shawon, Z., Daniel, T., Hidajat, K., & Uddin, M. (2013). Fe3O4/cyclodextrin polymer nanocomposites for selective heavy metals removal from industrial wastewater. In Carbohydr. Polym. (pp. 322-332). PubMed. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Afolalu, S. A., Ikumapayi, O. M., Ogedengbe, T. S., Kazeem, R. A., & Jen, T. C. (2023). Efficacy of composite filter in treating wastewater. Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.229 [Google Scholar]
  13. Center for the Study of the Built Environment (CSBE). (2003). Greywater reuse in other countries and its applicability to Jordan. Jordan. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, L. (2009). Experimental research on adsorption of phenol onto activated clay from wastewater,. Natural Sciences Education, 38, 430-434. [Google Scholar]
  15. Daneshvar, E., Vazirzadeh, A., Niazi, A., Sillanpaa, M., & Bhatnagar, A. (2017). A comparative study of methylene blue biosorption using different modified brown, red andgreen macroalgae—Effect of pretreatment.. Chemical Engineering Journal(307), 435-446. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Afolalu SA.; Ikumapayi, O.M.; Ogundipe AT.; Okwilagwe O.O.; Oloyede O.R.; Adeoye A.O.M. (2022): Development of Composite Filters from Biochars for Wastewater Treatment. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies (AMPT), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2022.2044611 [Google Scholar]
  17. Duan, J., & Gregory, J. (2003). Coagulation by hydrolysing metal salts. Advances in Colloid Interface Science.(475-502.), 100 - 102. [Google Scholar]
  18. Evans, M., Halliop, E., & MacDonald, J. (1999.). The production of chemically-activated carbon. Carbon, 37, 269-274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gao, B., Cho, Y., Yao, Q., & Wang, B. (2005.). Characterization and coagulation of a poly aluminium chloride coagulant with high AL13 contant. Journal of Environment Management,, 76(2), 143-147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gao, B., Hahn, H., & Hoffmann, E. (2002,). Evaluation of aluminum-silicate polymer composite as a coagulant for water treatment. Water Research, 36, 3573-3581. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fagan, C. (2015). Evaluating the Potential for Passive Greywater Irrigation in Northern Ghana. Michigan: Michigan Technological University. [Google Scholar]
  22. Filote, C., Ungureanu, G., Boaventura, R., Santos, S., Volf, I., & Botelho, C. (2017). Green macroalgae from the Romanian coast of Black Sea: Physico-chemical characterization and future perspectives on their use as metal anions biosorbents. Process Saf. Environ. Prot.(108), 34-43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Finch, C., Lillibridge, B., Fry, E., Lesikar, B., Silvy, V., McNally, M., et al. (2003). Greywater literature research. Texas: San Antonio Water System, Texas Cooperative Extension, The Center for Water Research, UTSA. [Google Scholar]
  24. Galil, N., Kovalio, R., & Friedler, E. (2005). On-site greywater treatment and reuse in multi-storey buildings. Water Science & Technology, 51(10), 187-194. [Google Scholar]
  25. Habuda-Stanić, M., Kalajdžić, B., Kuleš, M., & Velić, N. (2008). Arsenite and arsenate sorption by hydrous ferric oxide/polymeric material. Desalination, 229, 1-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hatt, J., Germain, E., & Judd, S. (2011). Precoagulation microfiltration for wastewater reuse. Water Research, 19, 6471-6478. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Khalaphallah, R. (2012). Greywater treatment for reuse by slow sand filtration: study of pathogenic microorganisms and phage survival. Chem. Process Eng. Ecole des Mines de Nantes. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lea, M. (2010.). Bioremediation of turbid surface water using seed extract from moringa oleifera lam. 1. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mahmood, Z., Zahra, S., Iqbal, M., Raza, M., & Nasir, S. (2017). Comparative study of natural land modified biomass of Sargassum sp. for removal of Cd2+ and Zn2+ from wastewater. Appl. Water Sci. (7), 3469-3481. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Henderson, R., Sharp, E., Jarvis, P., Parsons, S., & Jefferson, B. (2006). Identifying the linkage between particle characteristics and understanding coagulation performance,. 6, 31-38. [Google Scholar]
  31. Jatto, E., Asia, I., Egbon, E., Otutu, J., Chukwuedo, M., & Ewansiha, C. (2010). Treatment of waste water from food industry using Snail Shell,. 32-36. [Google Scholar]
  32. Omar, H., El-Gendy, A., & Al-Ahmary, K. (2018). Bioremoval of toxic dye by using different marine macroalgae. Turk. J. Bot(42), 15-27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Verma, A., Roshan Dash, R., & Bhunia, P. (2012). A review on chemical coagulation/flocculation technologies for removal of color from textile wastewaters. Journal of Environmental Management, 93, 154-168. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nnaji, P., Okolo, B., Menkiti, M., Ume, C., & Agu, C. (2015). Kinetics and Particle Removal Profile of Pulverized Snail Shell - Alum Induced CoagFlocculation of Quarry Effluent. Journal of Applied Science Technology, 5, 621-632. [Google Scholar]
  35. O'Toole, J., Sinclair, M., Malawaraarachchi, M., Hamilton, A., Barker, S., & Leder, K. (Sept 2012). Microbial quality assessment of household greywater.(46(13):4301-13.). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.