Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 558, 2024
4th International Conference on Sustainable, Circular Management and Environmental Engineering (ISCMEE 2024)
Article Number 01005
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202455801005
Published online 02 August 2024
  1. Büyüktuna, O. (2012). Failure mode and effects analysis and an application in the machinery industry. [Master’s thesis, Pamukkale University]. National Thesis Center. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akın, B., Vedat, E., & Çetin, C. (1998). Total quality management and ISO 9000 quality assurance system. Beta Publishing Distribution Inc. [Google Scholar]
  3. Durhan, D. (2006). Failure mode effects analysis (FMEA) and an application. [Master’s thesis, Gazi University]. National Thesis Center. [Google Scholar]
  4. Atalay, E. B. (2019). Risk prioritization in the cable industry with failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy logic and grey theory [Master’s thesis, Kocaeli University]. National Thesis Center. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ateş, İ. (2016). Failure mode and effect analysis in metal industry. [Master’s thesis, Marmara University]. National Thesis Center. [Google Scholar]
  6. Akın, B. (1998). Failure mode and effect analysis. Science Technical Publisher. [Google Scholar]
  7. Benli, C. (2021). TRIZ, QFD, and FMEA application in a new product development. [Master’s thesis]. Adana Alparslan Türkeş Science and Technology University. [Google Scholar]
  8. Babacan, A. (2020). Car selection for middle income group in Turkey: VIKOR method as multi-criteria decision making method.Cumhuriyet University Journal Of Economics And Administrative Sciences, 21(1), 293-307. [Google Scholar]
  9. Doğan, H., Uludağ, A. S. (2016). A service quality application focusing on the comparison of multi-criteria decision making methods. ÇankırıKaratekin University Journal Of The Faculty Of Economics And Administrative Sciences, 6 (2), 17-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.18074/cnuiibf.356 [Google Scholar]
  10. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G. H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comprasion with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178 (2), 514-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Opricovic, S. (2011). Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning. Expert Systems With Applications, 38 (10), 12983-12990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.097 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yıldırım, F.,& Önder, E. (2014). Multi-criteria decision making methods. Dora Publications. [Google Scholar]
  13. Abbaslı, N. (2021). A hybrid risk assessment for offshore wind turbines. [Master’s thesis, İstanbul Technical University]. İTÜ Academy. [Google Scholar]
  14. Demiral, O. T. (2019). A research on FMEA analysis in automotive sector [Master’s thesis, Süleyman Demirel University]. National Thesis Center. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hu-Chen, L., Jian-Xin, Y., Xue-Feng, D.,& Qiang, S. (2015). Improving risk evaluation in FMEA with a hybrid multiple criteria decision making method. International Journal Of Quality & Reliability Management, 32 (7), 763-782. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-10-2013-0169 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Soydinç Bey, M. (2023). FMEA and fuzzy AHP approaches in improving product quality and monitoring quality costs with the PAF model [Master’s thesis]. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Academic Data Management System. [Google Scholar]
  17. Taş, Y., Koç, K. H. (2010). The application of the failure mode effects analysis to furniture industries. Journal Of İstanbul Aydın University, 2 (5), 150-178. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tay, K. M., Lim, C. P. (2006). Fuzzy FMEA with a guided rules reduction system for prioritization of failures. International Journal of Quality And Reliability Management, 23 (8), 1047-1066. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02656710610688202 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.