EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 558 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 558 (2024) 01010 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 558, 2024
4th International Conference on Sustainable, Circular Management and Environmental Engineering (ISCMEE 2024)
Article Number 01010
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202455801010
Published online 02 August 2024
  1. Andreoni, A. (2018). The architecture and dynamics of industrial ecosystems: diversification and innovative industrial renewal in Emilia Romagna. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(6), 1613–1642. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bey037 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fera, P., Pizzo, M., Vinciguerra, R. & Ricciardi, G. (2022). Sustainable corporate governance and new auditing issues: a preliminary empirical evidence on key audit matters. Corporate Governance, 22, 194-211. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2020-0427 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Nishitani, K., Kokubu, K. (2020). Can firms enhance economic performance by contributing to sustainable consumption and production? Analyzing the patterns of influence of environmental performance in Japanese manufacturing firms. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 21, 156-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.12.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fraser, I. J., Schwarzkopf, J., & Müller, M. (2020). Exploring supplier sustainability audit standards: potential for and barriers to standardization. Sustainability, 12(19), 8223. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198223 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Al Ani, M. K., ALshubiri, F., & Al-Shaer, H. (2024). Sustainable products and audit fees: empirical evidence from western European countries. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2023-0131 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dakhli, A. (2022). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm financial performance: does audit quality matter?. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(5), 950-976. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Corsi, K., & Arru, B. (2021). Role and implementation of sustainability management control tools: critical aspects in the Italian context. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability, 34(9), 29-56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Marrucci, L., & Daddi, T. (2022). The contribution of the Eco‐Management and Audit Scheme to the environmental performance of manufacturing organisations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2958 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gunawan, J., Permatasari, P., & Tilt, C. (2020). Sustainable development goal disclosures: Do they support responsible consumption and production?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 118989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118989 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nylund, P. A., Agarwal, N., Probst, C., & Brem, A. (2022). Firm engagement in UN Sustainable Development Goals: Introduction of a constraints map from a corporate reports content analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 371, 133446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133446 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Antoniuk, O., Chyzhevska, L., Semenushina, N. (2019). Legal regulation and trends of audit services: what are the differences (evidence of Ukraine). Independent Journal of Management & Production, 10, (Special Edition PDATU, 2019), 673-686. http://dx.doi.org/10.14807/ [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pavelko, O., Lazaryshyna, I., Harnaha, O., Nesenenko, P., Myronets, M., & Sokoliuk, S. (2023). Strategic alternatives for the development of the agricultural sector in conditions of environmental sustainability. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 1126(1), 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1126/1/012027 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pavelko, O., Antoniuk, O., Lazaryshyna, I., Los Z. (2021).Indicators of effectiveness in the sustainable development field of construction companies: evidence of Ukraine. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 915 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/915/1/012026 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Deloitte. (2024).:https://www.2.deloitte/ua/uk.html [Google Scholar]
  15. KPMG. (2024). https://home.kpmg.com/ua/uk/home/services [Google Scholar]
  16. Ernst & Young (agency in Ukraine). (2024): http://www.ey.com/ua/uk/services [Google Scholar]
  17. Transparency reports (2018-2022). «Audit company «MGI PSP Audit». https://pspaudit.ua/obovyazkovi-zviti-pro-prozorist/ [Google Scholar]
  18. He, H., & Sutunyarak, C. (2024). Perception of corporate social responsibility, organizational commitment and employee innovation behavior: A survey from Chinese AI enterprises. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(6), 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17060237 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mikhno, I., Koval, V., Sedikova, I., & Kotlubai, V. (2022). Digital globalization in the international development of strategic alliances. Economics Ecology Socium, 6(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.31520/2616-7107/2022.6.1-2 [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen, Y., Gao, W., Chygryn, O., Lyulyov, O. & Pimonenko, T. (2024). Management of companies’ green competitiveness: Coordination degree between core determinants. Journal of Competitiveness, 16(1), 96-114. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2024.01.06 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ahmed, R. R., & Streimikiene, D. (2021). Environmental Issues and Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility for Organizational Competitiveness. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(2), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.02.01 [Google Scholar]
  22. Mai, N. K., Nguyen, A. K. T., & Nguyen, T. T. (2021). Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy to Enhance Firm Reputation and Competitive Advantage. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(4), 96–114. https://doi.or- g/10.7441/joc.2021.04.06. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, D. (2022). Are firms motivated to greenwash by financial constraints? Evidence from global firms’ data. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 33(3), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12153 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.