Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 559, 2024
2024 International Conference on Sustainable Technologies in Civil and Environmental Engineering (ICSTCE 2024)
Article Number 04003
Number of page(s) 9
Section Structural Engineering & Concrete Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202455904003
Published online 08 August 2024
  1. R. Kajaste, M. Hurme, Cement industry greenhouse gas emissions - Management options and abatement cost, J. Clean. Prod. 112 (2016) 4041–4052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.055. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Chithambar Ganesh, M. Muthukannan, A review of recent developments in geopolymer concrete, Int. J. Eng. Technol. 7 (2018) 696–699. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.14000. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Chithambar Ganesh, Experimental Study on the Behaviour of Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Made of M Sand, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Chithambar Ganesh, M. Vinod Kumar, R. Kanniga Devi, P. Srikar, S. Prasad, M. Manoj Kumar, R.P. Sarath, Pervious Geopolymer Concrete under Ambient Curing, Mater. Today Proc. 46 (2021) 2737–2741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.425. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M.S. Chithambar Ganesh. A, Muthukannan. M, Rajeswaran. M, Uma Shankar. T, Comparative Study on the Behavior of Geopolymer Concrete Using M-Sand and Conventional Concrete Exposed to Elevated Temperature, Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 9 (2018) 981–989. https://doi.org/10.1021/je60086a034. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Chithambar Ganesh, M. Muthukannan, Investigation on the glass fiber reinforced geopolymer concrete made of M-sand, J. Mater. Eng. Struct. 6 (2019) 501–512. [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Chithambar Ganesh, M. Muthukannan, S. Aakassh, Prasad, B. Subramanaian, Energy efficient production of geopolymer bricks using industrial waste, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 872 (2020) 012154 (1-10). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/872/1/012154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Habert, J.B. D’Espinose De Lacaillerie, N. Roussel, An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: Reviewing current research trends, J. Clean. Prod. 19 (2011) 1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M.A. Villaquirán-Caicedo, R. Mejía De Gutiérrez, N.C. Gallego, A novel MK-based geopolymer composite activated with rice husk ash and KOH: Performance at high temperature, Mater. Constr. 67 (2017) 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3989/mc.2017.02316. [Google Scholar]
  10. A.C. Ganesh, M.V. Kumar, K. Mukilan, A.S. Kumar, Investigation on the effect of ultra fine rice husk ash over slag based geopolymer concrete, Res. Eng. Struct. Mater. x (2022) 1–15. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17515/resm2022.501ma0814. [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Duxson, A. Fernández-Jiménez, J.L. Provis, G.C. Lukey, A. Palomo, J.S.J. Van Deventer, Geopolymer technology: The current state of the art, J. Mater. Sci. 42 (2007) 2917–2933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Davidovits, Properties of Geopolymer Cements, First Int. Conf. Alkaline Cem. Concr. (1994) 131–149. [Google Scholar]
  13. M.A. Gómez-Casero, F.J. Moral-Moral, L. Pérez-Villarejo, P.J. Sánchez-Soto, D. Eliche-Quesada, Synthesis of clay geopolymers using olive pomace fly ash as an alternative activator. Influence of the additional commercial alkaline activator used, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 12 (2021) 1762–1776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.03.102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Vinai, M. Soutsos, Production of sodium silicate powder from waste glass cullet for alkali activation of alternative binders, Cem. Concr. Res. 116 (2019) 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. E.D. Rodríguez, S.A. Bernal, J.L. Provis, J. Paya, J.M. Monzo, M.V. Borrachero, Effect of nanosilica-based activators on the performance of an alkali-activated fly ash binder, Cem. Concr. Compos. 35 (2013) 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.08.025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. X. Gao, Q.L. Yu, A. Lazaro, H.J.H. Brouwers, Investigation on a green olivine nano-silica source based activator in alkali activated slag-fly ash blends: Reaction kinetics, gel structure and carbon footprint, Cem. Concr. Res. 100 (2017) 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.06.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M.F. Alnahhal, A. Hamdan, A. Hajimohammadi, T. Kim, Effect of rice husk ash-derived activator on the structural build-up of alkali activated materials, Cem. Concr. Res. 150 (2021) 106590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106590. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. A.C. Ganesh, H. Prasad, R.J. Ram, P.K. Mukilan, Effect of granite waste in slag ‑ based geopolymer activated by RHA derivative, Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01241-3. [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Anuradha, V.V. Sreevidyaa R. and Rangan, B.V., Modified Guidelines for Geopolymer Concrete Mix Design using Indian Standard, Asian J. Civ. Eng. (Building Housing). 13 (2011) 357–368. [Google Scholar]
  20. S.A. Bernal, E.D. Rodríguez, R. Mejía De Gutiérrez, M. Gordillo, J.L. Provis, Mechanical and thermal characterisation of geopolymers based on silicate-activated metakaolin/slag blends, J. Mater. Sci. 46 (2011) 5477–5486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5490-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. W.K.W. Lee, J.S.J. Van Deventer, The effects of inorganic salt contamination on the strength and durability of geopolymers, Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 211 (2002) 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00239-X. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. J.S.. Duxson, P., Provis, J.L., Lukey, G.C., Mallicoat, S.W., Kriven, W.M., van Deventer, Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties, Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 269 (2005) 47–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. K.T. Tong, R. Vinai, M.N. Soutsos, Use of Vietnamese rice husk ash for the production of sodium silicate as the activator for alkali-activated binders, J. Clean. Prod. 201 (2018) 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.