EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 562 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 562 (2024) 10006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 562, 2024
BuildSim Nordic 2024
Article Number 10006
Number of page(s) 12
Section Digital Twin & Smart Buildings
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456210006
Published online 07 August 2024
  1. Balaji, B., Bhattacharya, A., Fierro, G., Gao, J., Gluck, J., Hong, D., ... & Whitehouse, K. (2016, November). Brick: Towards a unified metadata schema for buildings. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Built Environments (pp. 41-50). [Google Scholar]
  2. Balaji, B., Bhattacharya, A., Fierro, G., Gao, J., Gluck, J., Hong, D., ... & Whitehouse, K. (2018). Brick: Metadata schema for portable smart building applications. Applied energy, 226, 1273-1292. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chaudhary, G., New, J., Sanyal, J., Im, P., O’Neill, Z., & Garg, V. (2016). Evaluation of “Autotune” calibration against manual calibration of building energy models. Applied energy, 182, 115-134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dronkelaar, Chris van, Mark Dowson, Catalina Spataru, and Dejan Mumovic. 2016. “A Review of the Regulatory Energy Performance Gap and Its Underlying Causes in NonDomestic Buildings.” Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering 1 (January): 1– 14. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ghiaus, C. (2006). Experimental estimation of building energy performance by robust regression. Energy and buildings, 38(6), 582-587. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hong, T., Yang, L., Hill, D., & Feng, W. (2014). Data and analytics to inform energy retrofit of high performance buildings. Applied Energy, 126, 90-106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jensen, Per Anker. 2012. “Knowledge Transfer from Facilities Management to Building Projects: A Typology of Transfer Mechanisms.” Architectural Engineering and Design Management 8 (3): 170–79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johra, H., Schaffer, M., Chaudhary, G., Kazmi, H. S., Le Dréau, J., & Petersen, S. (2023). What Metrics Does the Building Energy Performance Community Use to Compare Dynamic Models?. In Proceedings of Building Simulation 2023: 18th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association. Shanghai, China, 4-6 September 2023. IBPSA. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lassen, N., Josefsen, T., & Goia, F. (2021). Design and in-field testing of a multi-level system for continuous subjective occupant feedback on indoor climate. Building and Environment, 189, 107535. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. McBride, B. (2004). The resource description framework (RDF) and its vocabulary description language RDFS. In Handbook on ontologies (pp. 51-65). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Menezes, Anna Carolina, Andrew Cripps, Dino Bouchlaghem, and Richard Buswell. 2012. “Predicted vs. Actual Energy Performance of Non-Domestic Buildings: Using Post-Occupancy Evaluation Data to Reduce the Performance Gap.” Applied Energy 97: 355–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Minerva, R.; Crespi, N.; Farahbakhsh, R.; Awan, F.M. Artificial Intelligence and the Digital Twin: An Essential Combination. In The Digital Twin; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 299–336. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ornetzeder, Michael, Magdalena Wicher, and Jürgen Suschek-Berger. 2016. “User Satisfaction and Well-Being in Energy Efficient Office Buildings: Evidence from Cutting-Edge Projects in Austria.” Energy and Buildings 118: 18–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Robinson, S. (2023). Exploring the relationship between simulation model accuracy and complexity. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 74(9), 1992-2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Saad, M. M., & Eicker, U. (2023). Investigating the reliability of building energy models: Comparative analysis of the impact of data pipelines and model complexities. Journal of Building Engineering, 71, 106511. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sanyal, J., & New, J. (2013, May). Simulation and big data challenges in tuning building energy models. In 2013 Workshop on Modeling and Simulation of Cyber-Physical Energy Systems (MSCPES) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sun, J., & Reddy, T. A. (2006). Calibration of building energy simulation programs using the analytic optimization approach (RP-1051). HVAC&R Research, 12(1), 177-196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tuegel, E. J., Ingraffea, A. R., Eason, T. G., and Spottswood, S. M., 2011, “Reengineering Aircraft Structural Life Prediction Using a Digital Twin,” Int. J. Aerosp. Eng., 2011, pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wagg, D. & Worden, Keith & Barthorpe, Robert & Gardner, Paul. (2020). Digital Twins: State-of-The-Art Future Directions for Modelling and Simulation in Engineering Dynamics Applications. ASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg. 6. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zou, P. X., Xu, X., Sanjayan, J., & Wang, J. (2018). Review of 10 years research on building energy performance gap: Life-cycle and stakeholder perspectives. Energy and Buildings, 178, 165-181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.