Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 563, 2024
International Conference on Environmental Science, Technology and Engineering (ICESTE 2024)
Article Number 02006
Number of page(s) 7
Section Civil Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456302006
Published online 30 August 2024
  1. Y. Zhai, X. Li, L. Wang, D. Li, Three-layered layer-by-layer pressure examination of single-lap, countersunk composite joints with fluctuating joining point of interaction conditions. Compos. Struct. 202, 1021–1031 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J.H. Kweon, J.W. Jung, T.H. Kim, J.H. Choi, D.H. Kim, Disappointment of carbon composite-to-aluminum jointswith consolidated mechanical affixing and cement holding. Compos. Struct., 75(1-4),192–198 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Ireman, T. Nyman, K. Hellbom, On plan techniques for darted joints in composite airplane structures. Compos. Struct., 25(1-4), 567–578 (1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. T.A. Collings, The strength of catapulted joints in multi-directional CFRP overlays. Composites, 8(1), 43–55 (1977) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. K.J. Jadee, A.R. Othman, Fiber supported composite design with catapulted joint — A survey. Key Eng. Mater. 471–472 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  6. L.J. Hart-Smith, Catapulted and reinforced joints. In ASM Handbook, Composites, second ed.; Supernatural occurrence, D.B. Donaldson, S.L., Eds.; ASM Worldwide: Materials Park, Goodness, USA, 271–289 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  7. M. D'Aniello, F. Portioli, L. Fiorino, R. Landolfo. Trial examination on shear conduct of riveted connections in steel structures. Eng. Struct. 33, 516–531 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Jiang, L. Sun, D. Dong, G. Li, J. Cui, Microstructure and mechanical property development of CFRP/Al electromagnetic bolted lap joint in a serious condition. Eng. Struct. 180, 181–191 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Q.M. Li, R.A.W. Mines, R.S. Birch. Static and dynamic way of behaving of composite bolted joints in tension. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 43(7), 1591–1610 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. X. Deng, J.W. Hutchinson, The clipping pressure in a chilly driven bolt. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 40(7), 683–694 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Li, S.S. Ache, E. Woldesenbet, M.A. Stubblefield, P.F. Mensah, S.I. Ibekwe. Examination of prepregbonded composite single lap joint. Compos. B Eng. 32(8), 651–658 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Q. Zhang, X. Cheng, Y. Cheng, W. Li, R. Hu, Examination of tractable way of behaving and influence factors ofcomposite-to-metal 2D-scarf fortified joint. Eng. Struct. 180, 284–294 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M.D. Banea, L.F.M. Da Silva. Adhesively fortified joints in composite materials: An outline. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl. 223(1), 1–18 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Vallee, J.R. Correia, T. Keller, Ideal thickness of joints made of GFRP pultruded adherends andpolyurethane cement. Compos. Struct. 92(9), 2102–2108 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. D.M. Gleich, M.J.L. Van Tooren, A. Beukers. Examination and assessment of bondline thickness effects on failureload in adhesively reinforced structures. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 15(9), 1091–1101 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. L.F.M. Da Silva, T.N.S.S. Rodrigues, M.A.V. Figueiredo, M.F.S.F. De Moura, J.A.G. Chousal, Effect of adhesive sort and thickness on the lap shear strength. J. Adhes. 82(11), 1091–1115 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M.J.L. Van Tooren, D.M. Gleich, A. Beukers. Exploratory verification of a pressure peculiarity model topredict the effect of bondline thickness on joint strength. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 18(4), 395–412 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. L.F.M. Da Silva, E.A.S. Marques, R.D.S.G. Campilho. Configuration rules and techniques to further develop joint strength. In Handbook of Grip Innovation, first ed.; da Silva, L.F.M., Ochsner, A., Adams, R., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany 689–723 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  19. H. Zhou, J.P. Torres, D. Fernando, A. Regulation, R. Emberley. The bond conduct of CFRP-to-steel bonded joints with changing bond properties at raised temperatures. Eng. Struct. 183, 1121–1133 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Liu, M. Dawood. Test review and probabilistic bond qualities of adhesively-fortified steel buttjoints under blended mode loadings. Eng. Struct. 172, 163–171 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. O.E. Canyurt, J. Zhang. Pre-focused cement tie joints for thick composite sandwich structures. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 48(4), 389–399 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. T.E.A. Ribeiro, R.D.S.G. Campilho, L.F.M. Da Silva, L. Goglio, Harm examination of composite-aluminium adhesively fortified single-lap joints. Compos. Struct. 136, 25–33 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. E.L. Zaroug, M. Kadioglu, F. Demiral, M. Saad Doha, Experimental and numerical investigation into strength of bolted, bonded and hybrid single lap joints: Effects of adherend material type and thickness. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 87 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Sadowski, P. Golewski, E. Zarzeka-Raczkowska, Harm and disappointment cycles of mixture joints: Adhesivebonded aluminum plates built up by bolts. Comput. Mater. Sci. 50(4), 1256–1262 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Kumar et al., An Experimental And Numerical Investigation Of Mechanical Properties Of Glass Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites. Advanced Materials Letters 4, 567–572 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.