EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 567 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 567 (2024) 01027 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 567, 2024
8th International Conference “Physical & Chemical Geotechnologies” 2024
Article Number 01027
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456701027
Published online 09 September 2024
  1. Haddad, N. (2022). 3D and 2D Visual Digital Technologies and Cultural Heritage Documentation for Conservation and Monitoring: A Critical Review and Assessment. Optoelectronic Devices in Robotic Systems, 257–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09791-1_10 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Stylianidis, E., Evangelidis, K., Vital, R., Dafiotis, P., & Sylaiou, S. (2022). 3D Documentation and Visualization of Cultural Heritage Buildings through the Application of Geospatial Technologies. Heritage, 5(4), 2818–2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5040146 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Serain, C. (2016). The Contribution of Digital Technologies to the Mediation of the ConservationRestoration of Cultural Heritage. Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection, 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48974-2_32 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Russell, B., & Wrisley, D.J. (2023). The UX of DH Workshops. Digital Humanities Workshops, 162–171. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003301097-18 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Polyanska, A., Pazynich, Y., Poplavska, Z., Kashchenko, Y., Psiuk, V., & Martynets, V. (2024). Conditions of Remote Work to Ensure Mobility in Project Activity. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56474-1_12 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wrisley, D.M. (2007). Balance testing and training. Geriatric Rehabilitation Manual, 409–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-10233-2.50068-7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Villa, C., Jorkov, M.L., Madsen, C.K., & Jensen, J.F. (2022). 3D Documentation of Stone Sites at Ilulissat, West Greenland. Visual Heritage: Digital Approaches in Heritage Science, 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77028-0_7 [Google Scholar]
  8. Reckziegel, M., Wrisley, D.J., Hixson, T.W., & Jänicke, S. (2021). Visual exploration of historical maps. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 36(Supplement_2), ii251–ii272. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaa059 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dychkovskyi, R., Falshtynskyi, V., Ruskykh, V., Cabana, E., & Kosobokov, O. (2018). A modern vision of simulation modelling in mining and near mining activity. E3S Web of Conferences, (60), 00014. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20186000014 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. Georgoula, O., Stamnas, A., Patias, P., Georgiadis, C., & Fragkoulidou, V. (2013). Historical coastal urban landscapes digital documentation and temporal study with 2D/3D modeling functionality: The case of Thessaloniki, Greece. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 14(5), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2012.10.007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Psyuk, V., & Polyanska, A. (2024). The usege of artificial intelligence in the activities of mining enterprises. E3S Web of Conferences, (526), 01016. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202452601016 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kovacheva, S. (2016). Presentation of UNESCO Bulgarian Cultural Heritage Sites as Knowledge System in a Learning Environment. Digital Presentation and Preservation of Cultural and Scientific Heritage, (6), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.55630/dipp.2016.6.17 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Paganoni, M.C. (2016). Reclaiming heritage for UNESCO: Discursive practices and community building in northern Italy. Making Publics, Making Places, 75–94. https://doi.org/10.20851/publics-05 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Koch, H., Pawlak, Z., & Widera, B. (2020). Memoriał na uroczystość stulecia istnienia Królewskiej Kopalni Ołowiu i Srebra Fryderyk. Tarnowskie Góry, Poland: Stowarzyszenie Miłośników Ziemi Tarnogórskiej, 223 s. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wagner, M. (2024). Szczęśliwe zwycięstwo Lwa Lechistanu. Historia i Świat, (13), 527–534. https://doi.org/10.34739/his.2024.13.32 [Google Scholar]
  16. Filak, M., & Pawlak, Z. (2017). Tarnowskie Góry UNESCO. Obiekty pogórnicze wpisane na Listę Światowego Dziedzictwa UNESCO. Tarnowskie Góry, Poland: Stowarzyszenie Miłośników Ziemi Tarnogórskiej, 76 s. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hasterok, M., Piegza, M., & Dębski, P. (2021). Fibromyalgia from a psychiatric point of view. Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna, 21(2), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.15557/pipk.2021.0014 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lewińska, P., Róg, M., Żądło, A., & Szombara, S. (2022). To save from oblivion: Comparative analysis of remote sensing means of documenting forgotten architectural treasures – Zagórz Monastery complex, Poland. Measurement, (189), 110447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110447 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dzięgiel, M. (2021). The geotouristic attractiveness of the underground trails in Zabrze, Dąbrowa Górnicza and Tarnowskie Góry towns (Silesian Upland). Geotourism/Geoturystyka, 1-2(60-61), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.7494/geotour.2020.1-2(60-61).23 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sztwiertnia, D., Ochałek, A., Tama, A., & Lewińska, P. (2021). HBIM (heritage Building Information Modell) of the Wang Stave Church in Karpacz–Case Study. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 15(5), 713–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1645238 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kalwara, P. (2017). Grzegorz Szymborski, Wyprawa Fryderyka Augusta I do Inflant w latach 17001701 w świetle wojny domowej na Litwie, Wydawnictwo Inforteditions, Zabrze-Tarnowskie Góry 2015. In Gremium. Studies in History, Culture and Politics, (11). https://doi.org/10.34768/ig.vi11.238 [Google Scholar]
  22. Szombara, S., Lewińska, P., Z˙adło, A., Róg, M., & Maciuk, K. (2020). Analyses of the Pradnik riverbed shape based on archival and contemporary data sets-old maps, LiDAR, DTMs, orthophotomaps and cross-sectional profile measurements. Remote Sensing, 12(14), 2208. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142208 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Maciuk, K., Apollo, M., Mostowska, J., Lepeška, T., Poklar, M., Noszczyk, T., Kroh, P., Krawczyk, A., Borowski, Ł., & Pavlovčič-Prešeren, P. (2021). Altitude on Cartographic Materials and Its Correction According to New Measurement Techniques. Remote Sensing, 13(3), 444. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030444 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Grilli, E., Farella, E.M., Torresani, A., & Remondino, F. (2019). Geometric features analysis for the classification of cultural heritage point clouds. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, (XLII-2/W15), 541–548. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-541-2019 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lenda, G., Lewińska, P., & Siwiec, J. (2019). Accuracy of Merging Point Clouds at the Maximum Range of a Scanner with Limited Possibilities of Target Placement. Archives of Civil Engineering, 65(4). https://doi.org/10.2478/ace-2019-0057 [Google Scholar]
  26. Prizeman, O.E.C. (2015). HBIM and matching techniques: Considerations for late nineteenthand early twentieth-century buildings. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 21(3), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556207.2016.1139852 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Skarlatos, D., & Kiparissi, S. (2012). Comparison of laser scanning, photogrammetry and SfMMVS pipeline applied in structures and artificial surfaces. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, (1-3), 299–304. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-I-3-299-2012 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Park, H., & Lee, D. (2019). Comparison between point cloud and mesh models using images from an unmanned aerial vehicle. Measurement, (138), 461–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.023 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Krawczyk, A. (2022). Proposal of Redefinition of the Terms Geomatics and Geoinformatics on the Basis of Terminological Postulates. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(11), 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11110557 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.