Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 569, 2024
GeoAmericas 2024 - 5th Pan-American Conference on Geosynthetics
Article Number 06006
Number of page(s) 8
Section Landfills 1
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456906006
Published online 19 September 2024
  1. ASTM D4716, Standard Test Method for Determining the (In-plane) Flow Rate per Unit Width and Hydraulic Transmissivity of a Geosynthetic Using a Constant Head, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA [Google Scholar]
  2. GRI GC15, Standard Test Method for Determining the Flow Rate per Unit Width of Drainage Geocomposites with Discrete High Flow Components, Geosynthetic Institute, Folson, Pennsylvania. USA (2017) [Google Scholar]
  3. ISO 12958-2, Geotextiles and geotextile-related products-Determination of water flow capacity in their plane-Part 2: Performance test, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland [Google Scholar]
  4. ASTM D7931. Standard Guide for Specifying Drainage Geocomposites, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA [Google Scholar]
  5. ISO/TR 18228-4, Design using geosynthetics-Part 4: Drainage, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Blond, P. Saunier, T. Daqoune & S. Fourmont, Assessment of the Effect of Specimens Dimensions on the Measured Transmissivity of Planar Tubular Drainage Geocomposites, GeoMontreal 2013, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (2013) [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Zanzinger, Reduction factors for the long-term water flow capacity of drainage geocomposites, 3rd international conference Geofilters 2000, Warsaw, Poland (2000) [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Zhao, & F. Montanelli, Effect of soil presence on flow capacity of drainage geocomposites under high normal loads, Geosynthetics 1999 conference, Boston, Massachusetts, USA (1999) [Google Scholar]
  9. Y.H. Faure, Y. Matichard, P. Brochier & K. Suryolelono, Experimental and theoretical methodology to validate new geocomposite structures for drainage, Geotextiles and Geomembranes 12, pp 397–412 (1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Y.H. Faure, G. Auvin, C. Eloy-Giorni, Performance Tests and Design of Geocomposites for Drainage of Gas, Fifth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, Singapore, Vol. 2, pp 833–836 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  11. GRI White paper 4, Reduction Factors (RFs) used in geosynthetic design, Geosynthetic Institute, Folson, Pennsylvania. USA (2007) [Google Scholar]
  12. J.P. Giroud, J.G. Zornberg & A. Zhao, Hydraulic design of geosynthetic and granular liquid collection layers, Geosynthetics International, Special Issue on Liquid Collection Systems, Vol. 7, pp 285–380 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  13. J.P. Giroud, J.G. Zornberg & J.F. Beech, Hydraulic design of geosynthetic and granular liquid collection layers comprising two different slopes, Geosynthetics International, Special Issue on Liquid Collection Systems, Vol. 7, pp 453–489 (2000) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.