Open Access
Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 569, 2024
GeoAmericas 2024 - 5th Pan-American Conference on Geosynthetics
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 07003 | |
Number of page(s) | 7 | |
Section | Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Walls 1 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456907003 | |
Published online | 19 September 2024 |
- A.J. Khan, M. Sikder, Design basis and economic aspects of different types of retaining walls, J. Civ. Eng. 31 (2004) 17–34. [Google Scholar]
- A. Aguado, A. del Caño, M.P. de la Cruz, D. Gómez, A. Josa, Sustainability Assessment of Concrete Structures within the Spanish Structural Concrete Code, J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 138 (2012) 268–276. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000419 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Jelušič, R. Varga, B. Žlender, Parametric analysis of the minimum cost design of flexible pavements, Ain Shams Eng. J. 14 (2023) 101840. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2022.101840. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Jelušič, B. Žlender, Optimal design of piled embankments with basal reinforcement, Geosynth. Int. 25 (2018) 150–163. doi:10.1680/jgein.17.00039. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Jelušič, B. Žlender, Optimal Design of Reinforced Pad Foundation and Strip Foundation, Int. J. Geomech. 18 (2018) 04018105. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- N. Abu-Hejleh, J.G. Zornberg, T. Wang, J. Watcharamonthein, Monitored Displacements of Unique Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Bridge Abutments, Geosynth. Int. 9 (2002) 71–95. doi:10.1680/gein.9.0211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. Tatsuoka, D. Hirakawa, M. Nojiri, H. Aizawa, H. Nishikiori, R. Soma, M. Tateyama, K. Watanabe, A new type of integral bridge comprising geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls, Geosynth. Int. 16 (2009) 301–326. doi:10.1680/gein.2009.16.4.301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. Tatsuoka, M. Tateyama, M. Koda, K. Kojima, T. Yonezawa, Y. Shindo, S. Tamai, Research and construction of geosynthetic-reinforced soil integral bridges, Transp. Geotech. 8 (2016) 4–25. doi:10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.03.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Miyata, R.J. Bathurst, H. Miyatake, Performance of three geogrid-reinforced soil walls before and after foundation failure, Geosynth. Int. 22 (2015) 311–326. doi:10.1680/gein.15.00014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R.J. Bathurst, J. a Blatz, M.H. Burger, Performance of instrumented large-scale unreinforced and reinforced embankments loaded by a strip footing to failure, Can. Geotech. J. 40 (2003) 1067–1083. doi:10.1139/t03-052. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- I.P. Damians, R.J. Bathurst, E.G. Adroguer, A. Josa, A. Lloret, Sustainability assessment of earth-retaining wall structures, Environ. Geotech. 5 (2018) 187–203. doi:10.1680/jenge.16.00004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- I.P. Damians, R.J. Bathurst, E.G. Adroguer, A. Josa, A. Lloret, Environmental assessment of earth retaining wall structures, Environ. Geotech. 4 (2017) 415–431. doi:10.1680/jenge.15.00040. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Fifer Bizjak, S. Lenart, Life cycle assessment of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge system-A case study, Geotext. Geomembranes. 46 (2018) 543–558. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.04.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Jelušič, B. Žlender, Determining optimal designs for geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge abutments, Soft Comput. (2019). http://benjaminwpowell.com/scholarly-publications/other/democracy-freedom-and-coercion-book-review.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- P. Jelušič, B. Žlender, Experimental study of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge abutment, Geosynth. Int. 28 (2021) 479–490. doi:10.1680/jgein.21.00022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Jelušič, T. Žula, Sustainable Design of Circular Reinforced Concrete Column Sections via Multi-Objective Optimization, Sustainability. 15 (2023) 11689. doi:10.3390/su151511689. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.