EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 569 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 569 (2024) 28003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 569, 2024
GeoAmericas 2024 - 5th Pan-American Conference on Geosynthetics
Article Number 28003
Number of page(s) 8
Section Infrastructure improvement 3
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456928003
Published online 19 September 2024
  1. BS8006. BSI Standards Publication Code of practice for strengthened / reinforced soils and other fills. British Standards Institution. 2010; 179–191. [Google Scholar]
  2. CUR226. Design Guideline Basal Reinforced Piled Embankments Downloaded. 2016;(1):274. [Google Scholar]
  3. EBGEO. Recommendations for design and analysis of earth structures using geosynthetic reinforcements -EBGEO. 2011. 313 p. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gallant A.P., Shatnawi E., Farouz E., Jones T. A Case Study of Settlement and Load Transfer at Depth Beneath Column-Supported Embankments. Geotechnical Special Publication. 2018; 2018- March (GSP 296):337–351. [Google Scholar]
  5. Han J., Gabr M.A. Numerical analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced and pile-supported earth platforms over soft soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2002; 128(1):44–53. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhuang Y., Cui X. Analysis and modification of the Hewlett and Randolph method. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Geotechnical Engineering. 2015;168(2):144–157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ma H., Luo Q., Wang T., Jiang H., Lu Q. Numerical stability analysis of piled embankments reinforced with ground beams. Transportation Geotechnics. 2021;26(August 2020). [Google Scholar]
  8. Riyad A.S.M., Ferreira F.B., Indraratna B., Ngo T. A critical review on the performance of pile- supported rail embankments under cyclic loading: Numerical modeling approach. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2021;13(5):1–24. [Google Scholar]
  9. Filz G.M., Sloan J.A., McGuire M.P., Smith M., Collin J. Settlement and Vertical Load Transfer in Column-Supported Embankments. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2019;145(10):1–15. [Google Scholar]
  10. King L., King D., Bouazza A., Gniel J., Rowe R.K. Design of geosynthetic reinforced column supported embankments using an interaction diagram. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. 2021;49(1):159–165. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Van Eekelen S.J.M., Bezuijen A., Van Tol A.F. An analytical model for arching in piled embankments. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. 2013;39:78–102. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.07.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rui R., Han J., Ye Y.Q., Chen C., Zhai Y.X. Load Transfer Mechanisms of Granular Cushion between Column Foundation and Rigid Raft. International Journal of Geomechanics. 2020;20(1):1–12. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rui R., Van Tol A.F., Xia Y.Y., Van Eekelen S.J.M., Hu G. Investigation of soil-arching development in dense sand by 2D model tests. Geotechnical Testing Journal. 2016;39(3):415–430. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang Z., Tao F.J., Han J., Ye G.B., Cheng B.N., Xu C. Arching Development in Transparent Soil during Multiple Trapdoor Movement and Surface Footing Loading. International Journal of Geomechanics. 2021;21(3):04020262. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chevalier B., Otani J. Arching observation in three-dimensional trapdoor problem with X-ray CT and discrete element method. Soils and Foundations. 2011;51(3):459–469. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen J.F., Guo X., Sun R., Rajesh S., Jiang S., Xue J. Physical and numerical modelling of strip footing on geogrid reinforced transparent sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes [Internet]. 2021;49(2):399–412. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.10.011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ma S., Duan Z., Huang Z., Liu Y., Shao Y. Study on the stability of shield tunnel face in clay and clay-gravel stratum through large-scale physical model tests with transparent soil. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2022;119(August 2021):104199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Peng X., Zornberg J.G. Evaluation of soil-geogrid interaction using transparent soil with laser illumination. Geosynth Int. 2019;26(2):206–221. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ads A., Iskander M., Bless S. Soil-projectile interaction during penetration of a transparent clay simulant. Acta Geotech. 2020;15(4):815–826. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wallace J.F., Rutherford C.J. Geotechnical properties ofLAPONITE RD®. Geotechnical Testing Journal. 2015;38(5):574–587. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Viswanadham B.V.S., König D. Studies on scaling and instrumentation of a geogrid. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. 2004;22(5):307–328. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Iai S. Similitude for shaking table tests on soil-structure-fluid model in 1g gravitational field. 1989. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.