EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 603 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 603 (2025) 04013 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 603, 2025
International Symposium on Green and Sustainable Technology (ISGST 2024)
Article Number 04013
Number of page(s) 7
Section Sustainable Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202560304013
Published online 15 January 2025
  1. S. Nishikizawa, Major issues on community acceptance of wind power. Planning and Public Management, 42-2, 21–26 (2019). https://doi.Org/10.20714/jsia.17.152 [Google Scholar]
  2. R. James and M.C. Ros, Floating offshore wind market and technology review. Prepared for the Scottish Government (2015). https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33948 [Google Scholar]
  3. J.B. Grahama, J.R. Stephenson, and I.J. Smith, Public perceptions of wind energy developments: Case studies from New Zealand. Energy Policy, 37, 3348–3357 (2009). https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.035 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Bailey, K.L. Brookes, and P.M. Thompson, Assessing landscape impacts of wind turbines: Lessons learned from more than 50 years of wind power development worldwide. Aquatic Biosystems, 10-1, 8 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.022 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Abromas, P. Grecevicius, and N. Piekiene, Visual impact assessment of wind farms: A review of the potential influence of turbine rotational speed on their visual impact. In Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific Conference Rural Development (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104423 [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Kobayashi, Stakeholder analysis for offshore wind power generation and challenges to consensus building. Papers on Environmental Information Science, 35, 268–273 (2021). https://doi.org/10.11492/ceispapers.ceis35.0268 [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Handa, S. Nishikawa, and T. Murayama, Factors of social impacts due to coastal wind farms in the hilly area. Papers on Environmental Information Science, 28, 43–48 (2014). https://doi.org/10.11492/ceispapers.ceis28.043 [Google Scholar]
  8. N. Stephenson, Snow Crash (1992). [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Lohmann, Volumetric image analysis. Born digital (2009). Acceleration Studies Foundation, Metaverse road map. http://metaverseroadmap.org/ [Google Scholar]
  10. Y. Uchiyama, Efforts by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism on project PLATEAU: development, utilization, and open data of 3D urban models. Monthly magazine, Land readjustment, 64-5, 14–20 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Husamae, Utilization of metaverse and digital twins in the construction industry. Construction Management, 529, 51–55 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. Tanaka, Infrastructure DX promoted by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. Construction Management, 529, 8–11 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  13. Geospatial Information Authority of Japan: GSI Maps. https://www.gsi.go.jp/ [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Shimatani, D. Rikiishi, S. Sasaki, T. Nakai, and Y. Yamaguchi, Construction management for offshore wind power facilities. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 69-2, I114–I119 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejoe.69.I114 [Google Scholar]
  15. N. Harada, Examples of Utilizing DX (Digital Transformation) Technologies on [Google Scholar]
  16. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Oxn6BkjlZ8 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.