EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 604 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 604 (2025) 13005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 604, 2025
The 4th International Conference on Disaster Management (The 4th ICDM 2024)
Article Number 13005
Number of page(s) 6
Section Impact of Disaster and Disaster Risk Reduction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202560413005
Published online 16 January 2025
  1. S. Hardiyanto, and D. Pulungan. Komunikasi efektif sebagai upaya penanggulangan bencana alam di Kota Padang Sidimpuan. J. Interaksi, 3, 30–39 (2019) http://doi.org/10.30596/interaksi.v3i1.2694 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Febriati. and N. H. Muzaki. Pemanfaatan radar cuaca untuk mengidentifikasi sebaran abu vulkanik Gunung Merapi 3 Maret 2020. J. Widya Climago, 4, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Hariyono. and S. Liliasari. The Characteristics of volcanic eruption in indonesia. in volcanoes - geological and geophysical setting, theoretical aspects and numerical modeling, applications to industry and their impact on the human health (ed. Aiello, G.) (InTech, 2018). http://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71449 [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Grémion. et al. Tracking the evolution of the summit lava dome of Merapi volcano between 2018 and 2019 using DEMs derived from TanDEM-X and Pléiades data. J. of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 433, 107732 (2023). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2022.107732 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Gertisser. et al. Geological History, Chronology and magmatic evolution of merapi. in merapi volcano (eds. Gertisser, R., Troll, V. R., Walter, T. R., Nandaka, I. G. M. A. and Ratdomopurbo, A.) 137–193 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2023). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15040-1_6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. S. H. N. Hafida, N. K. M. Isa, M. H. Ibrahim, and J. Jumadi. The role of psychological adaptations in the forming of student’s behavioural adaptations in dealing with volcano eruptions in disaster-prone areas of Mount Merapi. Disaster Advances, 15, 18–26 (2022). http://doi.org/10.25303/1507da018026 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Budiyanto. Land use planning for disaster-prone areas in Southern Region of Mount Merapi. Agrivita. J. Agr. Sci, 43, (2021). http://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v1i1.2774 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. E. T. W. Mei, M. I. Sadali, and R. F. Putri. Persaudaraan sekolah (sister school) untuk pengurangan risiko bencana erupsi gunungapi. (Deepublish, Yogyakarta, 2022). [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Ikhsan, D. Legono, A. Pamudji Rahardjo, P. Harsanto, and M. Fujita. Dynamics of lahar-affected river tributaries of the Progo river after the 2010 Mt. Merapi eruption. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 437, 012009 (2020). http://doi.org/10.1088/1755- 1315/437/1/012009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Purba, S. H. Sumantri, A. Kurnadi, and D. R Putra. Analisis kapasitas masyarakat terdampak erupsi Gunung Semeru. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6, 599–608 (2022). http://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.2.599-608 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. H. N. Hafida, N. K. M. Isa, and N. Khotimah. Is psychological adaptability needed for high school students in disaster-prone areas of Mount Merapi Eruption? in IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 986, 012040 (2022). http://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/986/1/012040 [Google Scholar]
  12. L. SetiawanL. Studi fenomenologi: Kehidupan masyarakat paska erupsi Gunung Kelud tahun 2014 di Desa Puncu Kecamatan Puncu Kabupaten Kediri. Jurnal Penelitian Keperawatan, 4, 88–100 (2018). http://doi.org/10.32660/jurnal.v4i2.319 [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Hermon, et al. A policy model of adaptation mitigation and social risks the volcano eruption disaster of Sinabung in Karo Regency - Indonesia. GEOMATE, 17, (2019). http://doi.org/10.21660/2019.60.50944 [Google Scholar]
  14. E. D. Andita. et al. The influence of emotional support on the supportiveness of students at SMPN 6 Surakarta in Facing Flood Disasters. in IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1357, 012039 (2024). http://doi.org/10.1088/1755- 1315/1357/1/012039 [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Wijayanti, and S. H. N Hafida. Analysis of the psychological adaptability of high school students in disaster-prone areas of Mount Merapi. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1190, 012033 (2023). http://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1190/1/012033 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. W. Creswell, and J. D. Creswell. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (SAGE Publications, California, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Haute. van. Sampling Techniques. Sample types and sample size. in research methods in the social sciences: An a-z of key concepts (Oxford University Press, United Kingdom, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  18. M. F Ikhwan. et al. Pearson correlation and multiple correlation analyses of the animal fat s-parameter. TEM Journal, 13, 155–160 (2024). http://doi.org/10.18421/TEM131-15 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. I. Maryati, T. S. Sumartini, and D. Sofyan. Experiences of pearson formula in analysis regression. in IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1098, 032088, (2021). http://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1098/3/032088 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Kamil, R. Yoseptry, and D. Rostini. Manajemen pendidikan mitigasi bencana untuk menumbuhkan kesiapsiagaan peserta didik sekolah menengah pertama sebagai usaha pengurangan risiko bencana di kawasan Sesar Lembang. NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 8, 2144–2156 (2021). http://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v8i7.2021.2144-2156 [Google Scholar]
  21. N. Aghaei, H. Seyedin, and H. Sanaeinasab. Strategies for disaster risk reduction education: A systematic review. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 7, 1–8 (2018). http://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_31_18 [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Amri, D. K. Bird, K. Ronan, K. Haynes, and B. Towers. Disaster risk reduction education in Indonesia: challenges and recommendations for scaling up. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 17, 595–612 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-595-2017 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. D. R. K. Putra, S. Maarif, and L. Kurniawan. Community preparedness in facing mount semeru eruption to support national security. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 2, 1668–1675 (2023). http://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v2i5.448 [Google Scholar]
  24. A. I. Benardi, et al. Disaster preparedness in proximity of Merapi Volcano, Indonesia: Is there any relationship in knowledge and attitude of senior high school students?. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 13, 245–254 (2023). http://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.130207 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. N. Yustisia, T. Aprilayutini, and T. A. Utama. Pengaruh simulasi menghadapi bencana gempa bumi terhadap kesiapsiagaan siswa SDN 86 Kota Bengkulu. Journal of Nursing and Public Health, 7, 32–28 (2019). http://doi.org/10.37676/jnph.v7i2.888 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. M. N Fatanti, D. Rahmiati, and I.R Yustisia. Merawat tradisi lokal sebagai strategi pengurangan risiko bencana di Dusun Brau, Jawa Timur (Preserving local traditions as a strategy for disaster risk reduction in Brau Village, East Java). Jurnal IPTEK-KOM (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Komunikasi), 21, (2019). http://doi.org/10.17933/iptekkom.21.1.2019.75-91 [Google Scholar]
  27. Z. Y. İlerisoy, B.I Gökgöz, and A. Soyluk. Selection of emergency shelter areas using multi-criteria decision-making techniques: An assessment of the case of Erciş-Van, Turkey. Periodica Polytechnica Architecture, 53, (2022). http://doi.org/10.3311/PPar.19410 [Google Scholar]
  28. T. Aryanti, and A. Muhlis. Disaster, gender, and space: Spatial vulnerability in post-disaster shelters. in IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 447, (2020). http://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/447/1/012012 [Google Scholar]
  29. D. Kurniawati. Komunikasi mitigasi bencana sebagai kewaspadaan masyarakat menghadapi bencana. Jurnal Simbolika Research and Learning in Communication Study, 6, 51–58 (2020). http://doi.org/10.31289/simbollika.v6i1.3494 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. N. Anisah. Model sekolah aman bencana dalam upaya mewujudkan pendidikan karakter di MIN 1 Bantul. Literasi, 10, 9–20 (2019). http://doi.org/10.21927/literasi.2019.10(1).9-20 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. S. Arifin. Peran komunikasi antarpribadi dalam proses pemulihan trauma: Pada remaja korban bencana. Perspektif, 1, 534–548 (2022). http://doi.org/10.53947/perspekt.v1i5.185 [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Jagnoor, et al. Exploring the impact, response and preparedness to water-related natural disasters in the Barisal division of Bangladesh: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open, 9, e026459 (2019). http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026459 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. V. Cvetković, G. Roder, A. Öcal, P. Tarolli, and S. Dragićević. The role of gender in preparedness and response behaviours towards flood risk in Serbia. IJERPH, 15, 2761 (2018). http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122761 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. J. S. Becker, D. Paton, D. M. Johnston, K. R Ronan, and J. McClure. The role of prior experience in informing and motivating earthquake preparedness. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 179–193 (2017). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. S. Ayub, Kosim, I. W. Gunada, and E. P Handayani. Kesadaran kebencanaan pada perilaku kesiapsiagaan siswa. ORBITA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Fisika, 6, (2020). http://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v6i2.3026 [Google Scholar]
  36. S. Y. Tursilowati. Determinan kesiapsiagaan bencana tsunami siswa di sekolah siaga bencana Kretek Bantul Yogyakarta. Jurnal Kesehatan Indra Husada, 8, 231–240 (2020). http://doi.org/10.36973/jkih.v8i2.265 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.