EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 604 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 604 (2025) 13004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 604, 2025
The 4th International Conference on Disaster Management (The 4th ICDM 2024)
Article Number 13004
Number of page(s) 8
Section Impact of Disaster and Disaster Risk Reduction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202560413004
Published online 16 January 2025
  1. A. R. Prabowo, A. R. Dwicahyani, W. A. Jauhari, A. Aisyati, and P. W. Laksono, Development and application of humanistic logistics models for optimizing location-allocation problem solutions to volcanic eruption disaster (Case study: Volcanic eruption of Mount Merapi, Indonesia). Cogent Eng, 4, 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2017.1360541. [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Purwaningsih, S. A. Liusti, E. Purnamasari, R. Ramadhan, and A. F. R. Nasution, The Mount Marapi eruption disaster evacuation path model using a local wisdom approach. International Journal of GEOMATE, 26, 116, 64–71 (2024). https://doi.org/10.21660/2024.116.4353. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Cassidy et al., Explosive eruptions with little warning: Experimental petrology and volcano monitoring observations from the 2014 eruption of Kelud, Indonesia. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 20, 8, 4218–4247 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC008161. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rahayu, D. Priyo Ariyanto, S. Hartati, and J. Syamsiyah, Dampak erupsi Gunung Merapi terhadap lahan dan upaya-upaya pemulihannya. Caraka Tani- Jurnal Ilmu Ilmu Pertanian, 4, 1, 61–72 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  5. A. L. Nugraha, Hani’Ah, H. S. Firdaus, and S. Haeriah, Analysis of risk assessment of Mount Merapi eruption in settlement area of Sleman Regency’, in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics Publishing, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755- 1315/313/1/012003. [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Fiantis, Gusnidar, B. Malone, R. Pallasser, E. Van Ranst, and B. Minasny, Geochemical fingerprinting of volcanic soils used for wetland rice in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Geoderma Regional, 10, 48–63 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2017.04.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Eka Putra, Supriatna, and Sitanala, Risiko erupsi Gunung Marapi di Kabupaten Tanah Datar. Jurnal Geosains Terapan, 2, 3, 7–13 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  8. E. A. D. C. Utami and D. Hermon, Analisis spasial kerentanan erupsi Gunung Marapi terhadap wilayah permukiman. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8, 1, 9310–9319 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  9. F. Bari, B. Istijono, R. Yuhendra, A. Hakam, M. Noer, and T. Ophiyandri, Potential debris flow after earthquake in Mount Talamau Pasaman district and West Pasaman district. in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics, (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1173/1/012069. [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Michellier et al., Evaluating population vulnerability to volcanic risk in a data scarcity context: The case of Goma City, Virunga volcanic province (DR Congo). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 45 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101460. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Oldfield and A. Stevenson, After the fire: An ecological, phenomenological exploration of resilience-building following the Fuego volcanic eruption in Guatemala. Am J Community Psychol., (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12748. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pusat Vulkanologi dan Mitigasi Bencana Geologi, West Sumatra Mount Marapi eruption report. (Pusat Vulkanologi dan Mitigasi Bencana Geologi, Jakarta, 2024) [Google Scholar]
  13. J. W. Creswell, Design research: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, fifth edition. Sage Publishing, Los Angeles, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  14. Yin and Robert K., Qualitative research from start to finish, second edition (The Guilford Press, New York, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  15. S. J. Taylor, R. Bogdan, and M. L. DeVault, Introduction to qualitative research methods, fourth edition. (Wiley, New Jersey, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  16. BPBD Provinsi Sumatera Barat, Laporan bencana erupsi Gunung Marapi dan banjir galado di Sumatra Barat. Padang, (2024) [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Andriani, B. Istijono, F. Akmal, and B. Martanto Adji, Identification of landslide hazard in residential area Kubang Tangah District, Sawahlunto. Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science, 5, 2, 1154–1164 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  18. I. Amri, S. R. Giyarsih, and D. Ruslanjari, Tsunami risk awareness, hazard warning knowledge, and intended evacuation behavior among beach users in Bantul, Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 109, 104594 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104594. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Noviana, O. Kurniaman, N. S. Sb, S. D. Nirmala, and R. S. Dewi, How to prepare disaster mitigation knowledge for prospective teachers in Elementary School?. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13, 2, 1123–1134 (2021) https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i2.496. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Menghoung, B. Istijono, F. A. Ismail, M. Noer, and R. F. Zakir, Build back better and stronger the 2022 earthquake-damaged houses in Talamau–Pasaman Barat District. in E3S Web of Conferences, 464 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346407006. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  21. D. K. Chester, M. Degg, A. M. Duncan, and J. E. Guest, The increasing exposure of cities to the effects of volcanic eruptions: A global survey. Environmental Hazards, 2, 3, 89–103 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2000.0214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. P. Poland and K. R. Anderson, Partly cloudy with a chance of lava flows: forecasting volcanic eruptions in the twenty-first century. J Geophys Res Solid Earth, 125, (2020). https://doi/org/10.1029/2018JB016974 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.