Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 605, 2025
The 9th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology and Information System (ICENIS 2024)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01001 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| Section | Energy | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202560501001 | |
| Published online | 17 January 2025 | |
- N.P Agatha, A.A Harvan, F.R Prasetya, Examining waste-to-energy technology potential through the pilot project of Bantargebang Waste-to-Energy Power Plant, in Proceedings of The E3S Web of Conferences 485, (2024) [Google Scholar]
- UNEP, Waste-to-Energy: Considerations for Informed Decision-Making (2019) [Google Scholar]
- M.M. Hasan, M.G. Rasul, M.M.K. Khan, N. Ashwath, M.I. Jahirul, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 145, 11107 (2021) [Google Scholar]
- T. Ariyanto, R.B. Cahyono, A. Vente, S. Mattheij, R. Millati, Sarto, M.J. Taherzadeh, S. Syamsiah, International Journal of Technology 8, 1385-1392 (201 [Google Scholar]
- Franco, M. Villani, Geothermics, 38 (4), 379-391 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M.D. Surindra, W. Caesarendra, T. Prasetyo, T.M.I. Mahlia, Taufik, Processes, 7 (2), 113 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Rijpkema, O. Erlandsson, S.B. Andersson, K. Munch, Energy, 238, 121698 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kumara, S.K. Shuklab, Procedia Technology, 23, 454-463(2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T.F. Bertand, G. Papadakis, G. Lambrinos, A. Frangoudakis, Applied Thermal Engineering, 29 (11-12), 2468 (2010) [Google Scholar]
- H. Ismail, A.A. Aziz, R.H. Rasih, N. Jenal, Z. Michael, A. Roslan, Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 4(1), 29-46(2016) [Google Scholar]
- B.T. Prasetyo, S. Himawan, Suyanto, T. Surana, L. Agustina, Y. Yasser, M.D. Trisno, Design and Testing of n-Pentane Turbine for 2 kW Model of Binary Cycle Power Plant, In Proceedings World Geothermal Congress, 25 – 28 April 2010, Bali, Indonesia (2011) [Google Scholar]
- S. Frick, S. Kranz, G. Kupfermann, A. Saadat, E. Huenges, Geotherm Energy, 7 (30) (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Kukurugyová, G.G. Akkurt, J. Nalevanková, R. Dzurňák, Comparison of working fluids fororcgeothermal power plant ďurkov, in Proceedings of eConference of Doctoral Students and Young Researcher, ISeC, 20 – 24 July 2015, Bratislava, Slovakia (2015) [Google Scholar]
- R. DiPippo, Geothermal power plants: principles, applications, case studies and environmental impact, (2012) [Google Scholar]
- D.H. Kihara, P.S. Fukunaga, Working fluid selection and preliminary heat exchanger design for a Rankine cycle geothermal power plant (1975) [Google Scholar]
- B.F. Tchanche, G. Lambrinos, A. Frangoudakis, G. Papadakis, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15 (8), 3963-3979 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B.A. Fakeye, S.O. Oyedepo, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 413, 012019 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Ependi, T.B. Nur, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 309, 012055 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J.C.J. García, A. Ruiz, A. Reyes, W. Rivera, Processes, 11(7):1982 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.